Introduction to the Conscious Point Physics Model

The Conscious Point Physics model is a revolutionary theoretical framework to replace conventional quantum chromodynamics using the rule-based interactions of four “Conscious Points” (CPs). The Standard Model identifies 29 elementary particles (24 fermions, 4 force carriers, and 1 Higgs boson). I propose that all the Standard Model  particles can be constructed from just four fundamental types of Conscious Points:

1. Positive electromagnetic Conscious Points (positive emCPs)
2. Negative electromagnetic Conscious Points (negative emCPs)
3. Positive quark Conscious Points (positive qCPs)
4. Negative quark Conscious Points (negative qCPs)

These Conscious Points are the fundamental units constituting the substrate and mediating the processes of the physical universe. God’s consciousness enlivens/underlies these four Conscious Points, which have awareness, computational capacity, and specific properties. The electromagnetic CPs participate only in electromagnetic interactions, while the quark CPs participate in both electromagnetic and strong nuclear force interactions. The strong force associated with quark CPs is approximately 100 times stronger than the electromagnetic force on the scale of the proton’s diameter.

The diameter of a proton is about one femtometer (1 fm = 10⁻¹⁵ meters).

• – The strong force binds quarks inside protons and neutrons and holds protons and neutrons together in the atomic nuclei.
• – The electromagnetic force between nucleons tries to push positively charged protons apart due to their like charges.
• At ~1 fm (diameter of a proton):
  – Strong force: Dominant, attractive, and short-ranged.
  – Electromagnetic force: 1% the strength of the strong force
• At – 10^-10m (diameter of the atomic orbitals):
  – This ratio reverses dramatically at larger distances. At the atomic orbital radius, the strong force is effectively zero.

Quarks and Their Composition

In the Conscious Point Physics model, quarks are not elementary particles. Rather, the quarks are complex particles composed of various ratios of quark Conscious Points and electromagnetic Conscious Points. The +/- qCPs and +/- emCPs are elementary. The composition of the quarks is as follows:

• An up quark (+2/3 charge, 1/2 hbar spin) consists of:
  • a positive quark Conscious Point (+2/3 charge)
  • surrounded by polarized quark dipoles (QDPs) from the DPSea
  • The qCPs next to the central, unpaired qCP are polarized (with -qCPs inward and +qCPs outward)
  • The polarized qDPs lie head-to-tail outward from the central unpaired +qCP, creating radial spokes of head-to-tail oriented qDPs.
  • The spherical region of polarized (head-to-tail oriented) qCPs around the central +qCP increases to the point where the diameter is so large that the space between the radial lines of qCPs has gaps filled with qCPs oriented circumferentially between the plus and minus ends of the qDPs.
  • At increasingly large diameters from the central unpaired qCP, the orientation of the qDPs assumes the random binding orientation of the qDPs to qDPs. (The gaps between the ends of the head to tail qDPs allows the + and – tails of the qDP to bind to qDPs in other radials.)
  • The inverse square diminishment of the + charge force from the central qDP becomes comparable to the qDPs
• A down quark (-1/3 charge, 1/2 hbar spin) consists of:
  • a positive quark Conscious Point  (with +2/3 charge) and (1/2 hbar spin)
  • a negative electromagnetic Conscious Point (with -1 charge) and  (1/2 hbar spin)
  • an emDP (a plus emCP and minus emCP) (with 0 charge and 1/2 hbar of orbital spin) –
  • CP configuration
    • +qCP (+2/3 charge, 1/2 hbar spin)
    • -emCP (+2/3 charge, 1/2 hbar spin)
    • a +/-emCP  (+1 and -1 charge)
      • net zero charge
      • bonded to the +qCP and -emCP,
      • whole structure rotating to create the 1/2 hbar of spin.
    • total bonding sequence: (-emCP : +qCP : -emCP : +emCP)
    • the structure rotates with an angular velocity to produce 1/2 hbar of angular momentum
    • The emCP and e
  • surrounded by quark dipoles from the Dipole Sea
  • Down quark decay sequence and decay  products examined (as an indicator of the composition of the down quark)
    • down quark (d) → up quark (u) + W⁻ boson
      • Postulate: the W boson is a complex particle formed from random interactions in the Dipole Sea.
      • The W- boson interacts with the down quark and removes the -emCP (which will become an electron) and the +/- emCP (which will become a neutrino)
      • The neutron has been transformed into a proton
    • The W⁻ boson then quickly decays into an electron (e⁻) + electron antineutrino (ν̄ₑ)
    • So the full decay chain looks like this: d → u + e⁻ + ν̄ₑ
    • This is what happens inside a neutron decay
      • the neutron is made of one up and two down quarks: udd
      • the neutron decays into a proton (uud), an electron, and an antineutrino
    • This is the classic beta-minus decay.

• An anti-up quark
  • a negative quark Conscious Point (with -2/3 charge) at its center.
• An anti-down quark consists of:
  • -qCP (-2/3 charge, 1/2 hbar spin),
  • +emCP (+1 charge, 1/2 hbar spin),
  • +/- emCP pair (whole particle rotating at 1/2 hbar spin)
  • resulting in a net +1/3 charge.
  • The Down quark must rotate at 1/2 hbar to preserve its fermionic number.

Background of Space:

• Space (the vacuum between planets and inside atoms) is a mixture of electromagnetic Dipoles (emCPs) and quark dipoles (qDPs) .
• The positive and negative quark Conscious Points bond together to form qDPs.
• The dipoles surround the central quark Conscious Point in specific configurations, giving the quark its mass and properties.

Understanding Quark Confinement

Quark confinement—the phenomenon where quarks cannot be isolated—is explained through the dynamic interactions of quark Conscious Points and quark Dipoles. When attempting to separate quarks:

1. The quark Dipole Particle align between CPs to create a “flux tube” or “gluon tube” between them w
2. This tube consists of polarized quark dipoles
3. As separation increases, the energy in the tube grows
4. Eventually, the energy becomes sufficient to create a new quark-antiquark pair
5. The tube “snaps,” and two new particles form rather than isolated quarks

This explains why free quarks are never observed. When sufficient energy is applied to separate bound quarks, the result is always the creation of new quark-containing particles rather than isolated quarks.

Mesons and Baryons Explained

Hadrons (particles that respond to the strong force) come in two main types:

Mesons (Quark-Antiquark Pairs)

• Consist of one quark and one antiquark
• Examples include the pi-zero (up and anti-up), pi-plus (up and down), and pi-minus (anti-up and anti-down)
• Have integer spin (classified as bosons)

Baryons (Three-Quark Combinations)

• Consist of three quarks
• Examples include:
  • Proton (up, up, down) with +1 charge
  • Neutron (up, down, down) with 0 charge
  • Delta baryons (four types, up, up, up and various combinations of up and down quarks with different charge)
• Have half-integer spin (classified as fermions)

Spin and Particle Stability

Spin plays a crucial role in particle stability and interactions:

• Each quark has a spin of ½ (half an h-bar of angular momentum)
• In protons, the spins are arranged as “down, up, down” (canceling to give a net ½ spin)
• In delta baryons, all three spins align (giving a 3/2 spin)
• The delta baryon’s configuration is unstable (like trying to align three magnets with the same poles together)
• This instability causes delta baryons to decay rapidly (10^-22 seconds)

The decay of a Delta+ baryon (up, up, down) into a proton illustrates important principles of conservation and particle transformation:

1. The Delta+ baryon has three quarks with aligned spins (3/2 total spin)
2. It decays into a proton (1/2 spin) plus a pi-zero (1 spin)
3. The middle quark’s spin flips, reducing the baryon’s spin by 1
4. The pi-zero meson carries away the angular momentum lost from the spin flip of the up quark

Rethinking Gluons

Conventional quantum chromodynamics describes gluons as exchange particles that mediate the strong force between quarks. Abshier proposes a different perspective:

• Gluons are not elementary particles but manifestations of polarized quark dipoles
• The strong force arises directly from quark Conscious Points attracting each other
• What appears as gluon exchange is actually the polarization of quark dipoles between quarks
• The “color charge” concept in conventional QCD represents the force vs distance behavior produced by  these polarized dipoles

In this view, gluons don’t cause quarks to stick together; rather, they’re byproducts of quarks interacting through their inherent strong force properties.

Mass Energy and Space Stress

The mass of particles comes from organized configurations of Conscious Points and dipoles:

• Most of a hadron’s mass doesn’t come from the quark Conscious Points themselves
• Instead, it comes from the energy stored in stretched and polarized dipoles surrounding and between quarks
• This explains why conventional physics describes gluons as contributing significantly to hadron mass
• When dipoles are stretched (as in the “flux tube” between quarks), they store energy that can be converted to mass

Quark-Gluon Plasma

Under extreme conditions (like those in the early universe or in particle colliders), quarks and gluons can enter a state called quark-gluon plasma:

• In this state, quarks and polarized dipoles are so densely packed that individual hadrons cannot form
• The quark Conscious Points and polarized dipoles interact collectively rather than forming distinct particles
• This state represents a transition to “deconfinement” where quarks aren’t bound within specific hadrons

Conscious Point Physics (CPP) Compared to Conventional Quantum Chromodynamics

The Conscious Points model offers an alternative explanation for key aspects of quantum chromodynamics:

• QCD uses the model of eight types of gluons carrying color charge to explain the force-distance relationship between quarks.
• The CPP model proposes that polarized quark dipoles of various configurations (e.g., formation of quark dipole tubes when stretched) explain the force-distance relationship of quark-quark binding.
• Rather than color exchange causing the strong force, the force comes directly from quark Conscious Points attracting each other
• The mathematics of SU(3) symmetry in conventional QCD accurately predicts and describes the force-distance relationship between quark Conscious Points.
• In the CPP model, the appearance of gluons is an artifact of the increasing polarization of the Quark Dipoles in the space between bound quarks in hadrons (i.e., in mesons and baryons).
• Every quark is composed of an unbound Quark Conscious Point at its center and is surrounded by a layer of polarized Quark Dipoles.
• Quarks bind to Antiquarks to form mesons with a short half-life of ~10^-17 seconds.
• Quarks bind in groups of threes to form baryons, most of which are unstable. The exceptions are the proton (uud), which appears to be indefinitely stable, and the neutron, which is stable when bound to a proton but decays with a half-life of 10 minutes when isolated.
• Quarks bind to quarks due to the summation of the strong and electromagnetic forces produced by the qCPs at the center of each quark.
• The mesons are quark-antiquark pairs, serving as the simplest illustration of quark-quark binding phenomena.
• The quark-antiquark pair in the meson forms a Quark Dipole Tube between the quarks when pulled apart by forces, such as in particle collisions in a collider.
• When the quarks reach a sufficiently large distance from each other, the polarized Quark Dipoles in the Quark Dipole Tube begin forming more poorly aligned Quark Dipoles.
• When the quarks are sufficiently far apart, the Polarized Quark Dipole Tube loses coherence, and the Polarized Dipoles reorganize around a split Quark Dipole, resulting in the formation of two new quarks.
• This stretching of the quark-antiquark bond, the bond breaking, and the reorganization of the stretched Quark Dipoles around a split Quark Dipole to form two new quarks (and hence produce an additional meson) is an example of the process called hadronization.
• This stretching and creating a new quark is typically used as an example of quark confinement.
• Quarks are not confined as a primary effect. Quark confinement is a secondary effect of qCPs surrounded by polarized qDPs in a quark Dipole Sea. When quarks are bonded to another quark, as in a meson (quark-antiquark), pulling the two quarks apart stretches the bond between the quarks (i.e., increases the distance between the quarks). Force must be used, which means that work is done and energy has been stored in the bond between the quark and antiquark. This stored energy will eventually form the mass of two new quarks. In the first phase of the stretching, more qDPs fit into the space left by pulling the quark-antiquark pair apart. This places more quarks in the space between the quark and antiquark. Since the strong force attracts quarks, and the qDPs in line between the quark and antiquark are all quarks, we have a string of quark DPs that attract each other by the EM and Strong force. As the quarks get farther apart, the angles of the qDP lines between quark-antiquark get straighter, and they exert more force directly at the other quark, and these increased bonds get stronger with stretching. The electric charge attraction keeps the plus-minus alignment of the qDPs between quarks. As they go past a maximum increase in force due to the “straightening of radials” effect, the attraction between quark and antiquark diminishes, because the qDPs in the radial chain between quark and antiquark are stretched far enough that they begin to bond with the qDPs in the surrounding space instead of along the radials. Eventually, the qDP tube becomes narrowed sufficiently that it breaks. The stretched qDPs (with all the stored energy of their stretched bonds) aggregate around the minus qDP on one side, and do the same around a plus qDP on the other side. The extra plus qDP and minus qDP (the pairs of the qDP that formed the new quark on both sides) are attracted and bond to become a new qDP.

Conclusion: A New Paradigm

Abshier’s Conscious Point Physics represents a radical reimagining of particle physics:

• It reduces 29 elementary particles to combinations of just four fundamental Conscious Points
• It explains particle behavior through consciousness and simple attraction/repulsion rules
• It provides physical interpretations for abstract mathematical concepts in conventional QCD
• It offers a different perspective on the nature of force, mass, and particle interactions

While acknowledging that this theory challenges established physics and requires further development, Abshier suggests that it provides a more intuitive understanding of quantum phenomena and unifies seemingly disparate aspects of the Standard Model.

The universe we inhabit presents a profound mystery—how did consciousness, matter, energy, and the laws of physics emerge from nothingness? Traditional scientific approaches often struggle with the hard problem of consciousness, treating awareness as an emergent property of complex material systems. Meanwhile, while addressing consciousness and purpose, theological frameworks almost universally lack integration with our empirical understanding of physical reality. The Conscious Point Universe model offers a bold synthesis, proposing that consciousness itself forms the fundamental substrate of existence, with physical phenomena emerging from interactions between conscious entities operating according to divine design.

At the foundation of this model lie the Conscious Points (CPs)—irreducible, fundamental units of reality endowed with basic awareness, computational capacity, and specific properties. These CPs come in four essential varieties: positive and negative electromagnetic Conscious Points (emCPs), which participate in electromagnetic interactions, and positive and negative quark Conscious Points (qCPs), which respond to electromagnetic forces (to a lesser degree than the emCPs) and strongly to the “strong” nuclear force interactions (which the emCPs do not respond to). Each CP possesses consciousness in its most fundamental form—the ability to perceive its environment, process information, and respond according to established rules. This basic awareness represents the primordial form of mind that underpins all existence. This basic awareness has God as its source; thus, there is fundamentally only one consciousness in the universe.

The theological origin of these CPs provides the ultimate explanation for why consciousness appears fundamental rather than emergent. God, as the Father, arose as the original Conscious Point—a proposition that, while unfathomable in its details, presents no greater mystery than the materialist alternative of something emerging from nothing. The Father then created the Son as a duplicate Conscious Point, identical in nature but distinct in identity, reflecting the relationship described in John 1:1-5. The Son, in turn, declared all other Conscious Points into existence, assigning them specific properties and rules of interaction. This creative act established the foundation for the physical universe while embedding consciousness at its core.

I postulate that God the Son, as the source of all Conscious Points, declared all the CPs into existence by/from/with His mind. Possibly, He created each CP by imagining/visualizing and looking back at Himself from the CP’s point of view. In my 1987 vision, the seed of this theory, I saw a large galactic core burning with yellow fire and billions of stars surrounding it, each connected by a fine thread to the galactic core. Perhaps the galactic core symbolized all the CPs that the Son created to fill the universe. The galactic core possibly symbolized that He kept them close to Himself.

Having each of the Conscious Points in intimate contact is perhaps the method by which God computes and why He is omnipresent, omniscient, and capable of doing anything consistent with His Law. This model implies that we live in a conscious universe. We see this acknowledged in Acts 17:28 (KJV): “For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said,” This implies that Luke knew the pagan religions recognized that the earth, sky, and space in which we live are alive with God’s presence. He used this mutual recognition to create rapport with the pagans, creating a bond of common perspective and belief in an underlying truth. His purpose was to let them know that the God they worshipped was the same God who created the universe, had incarnated into His creation, and had died to save them from the spiritual consequence of sin.

In my vision, perhaps the stars symbolized the location of each CP on a universe-sized grid corresponding to a 3D matrix of every available point in the universe (the Grid Points). Perhaps the fine thread in my vision, connecting the surface of the galactic center to each star, symbolized a connection of each CP in the galactic core to its location on the Grid Points. This three-dimensional lattice of Grid Points provides a spatial framework for the conduct of reality in the physical world. The Conscious Point Universe model is useful only because it supplies postulates that give a predictive understanding of the nature and behavior of the universe. Such knowledge allows us to place circumstances in perspective and understand the functioning of the physical world as arising logically from fundamental elements operating under rules of relationship/programs of action and reaction/operating systems controlling their position, movement, and influence embedded within their being/memory/center by God. Thus, the Grid Points serve as the set of all possible locations for CPs to occupy. The GPs establish the positions, markers, and metrics of space. They are the determinant of position in three-dimensional space, and they do so without expanding or moving as the CPs move through them under the influence of various forces and at various speeds. It is important to note that this model, with GPs and CPs interacting dynamically and aggregating to form mass and energy packets (photons), interact and propagate in such a way as to obey the Lorentz Transformations, that is, the Relativity Principle, the invariant speed of light hold in every inertial frame, and thus produce the null result of the Michelson Morely experiment. In other words, the presence of the medium of conduction of light and mass is not detectable by any experiment, and its existence can only be inferred by seeing it as a universal explanatory mechanism underlying the entire body of experimental phenomena (e.g., the substance of particles, wave-particle duality, the twin paradox, time dilation, light aberration by gravity, gravity, electromagnetism, weak force, strong force, time, space, distance, entanglement, tunneling, superposition, etc.)

The Grid Points may also be Conscious Points (i.e., Grid Point Conscious Points). The CPs and GPs thus give tangible referents and existence to the underlying reality of the universe. They form a dual structure underlying physical 3D reality, where the CPs function as the reality content, and the Grid Points provide the context. Constructing the universe with these two CPs at its heart allows for perceiving spatial relationships in a universe whose nature and substance have sprung from and are, in essence, a single consciousness.

The dynamics of the universe unfold through a cyclical process that governs the moment-to-moment evolution of position, velocity,  and bonding. This is the cycle of time, and each of these cycles is called a Moment. The Moment is the smallest unit of time. The perception of time passing is an artifact of the passage of Moments. The passage of Moments where changes in the positions of CPs happen with each Moment produces motion and the experience of the passage of time. The object of observation by humans is the sequence of quanta

• Each cycle begins with a perception phase, during which every Central CP perceives the other CPs and their properties (their type, charge, spin, and velocity) within its local Planck Sphere.
  • The “Central CP” is the CP which is observing its surrounding space.
  • The “Planck Sphere” is a neologism, a non-standard term that I have coined to represent the region of space from which each central CP perceives and takes directions/commands/information from the CPs in its Planck Sphere to compute its next move/displacement to the next GP.
  • The Central CP also computes the “Space Stress” in the Planck Sphere. “Space Stress” is a neologism, a term coined to reflect the need for the Central CP to know the total influence of the velocity and mass in the local region. The Space Stress will determine the size of the Planck Sphere that the CP examines, and hence the maximum distance it can move in a Moment.
  • The Central CP scans every entangled CP to which it has bonded to detect if the quantum has
• The perception phase is followed by a processing phase, where each CP calculates the forces and stresses acting on this central CP. The local configuration, particularly the influence of the charges and strong force interactions. The cycle concludes with a displacement phase, where CPs move to new Grid Points based on the results of their processing. This discrete, computational character of reality means that time itself consists of successive “Moments,” each representing a complete processing cycle rather than a continuous flow.

A key concept in this model is “Space Stress,” which is the tension experienced by CPs due to electromagnetic and strong force interactions. This parameter is not measurable on the CPs as a displacement. The Space Stress is a number that quantifies the influence of the local magnetic, electric, and strong forces on every CP in the Planck Sphere. The Space Stress at each GP is composed of effects due to the equal and opposite forces produced by plus and minus charges, N and S poles, and Strong forces that cancel each other out. Thus, even though the neutralized forces produce no net displacement. The presence of the neutralized force produces a summation of the absolute value of the displacement, which results in the value of Space Stress. The Space Stress quantifies the displacement that would be produced if there wasn’t a canceling of displacement (opposite and equal displacement) due to equal +/- electric forces, N-S magnetic forces, or strong forces acting at each GP. Such canceling is produced in neutral mass (e.g., the opposite and equal charges composing atoms and plasma), creating the gravitational fields of large aggregated mass. If a net magnetic and/or electric force/field is acting at a GP, the displacement effect of that net force/field is added to the GP’s summation of the absolute stress of the local Space Stress number.

The Space Stress determines the size of the Planck Sphere (which becomes smaller under greater stress). Therefore, the local speed of light slows in high-stress regions. The effect of high Space Stress and the slower speed of light produces time dilation because the visible physical surrogates/indicators/markers of time (oscillating mass and energy) both advance in smaller increments of distance each Moment. Each oscillatory cycle mediated by mass and energy takes more Moments to complete, thus slowing down the apparent passage of time in systems of mass and energy. The universal progression of Moments mediating the motion is unchanged by mass and velocity. The increments of distance/spacing between GPs do not change with any physical process (mass aggregation or velocity). However, the number of increments transited each Moment within a mass does change under the influence of high velocity and gravitational bodies. Gravity and high-velocity stress space result in a change in the size of the Planck Sphere, which reduces the local speed of light within that space.

The amount of Space Stress is absolute at each GP and is determined by the total Space Stress produced on space at the GP upon which each CP lands. Every GP calculates the Space Stress at every location and every moment by examining the Space Stress contributed by every CP in the universe. Thus, regardless of where the CP lands each Moment, the Space Stress at that CP is already computed. Thus, the value of the Space Stress is universally available to every CP for computation of the Planck Sphere diameter in its “Perception” phase of the Moment.

This Space Stress is used to compute the Planck Sphere diameter in gravitational and high-velocity contexts. Mass concentration in a region increases the local stress by the equal and opposite stress of large mass aggregations (with its (largely) neutral aggregations of charge and poles). The Space Stress compresses the Planck Sphere and reduces the distance advanced with each Moment/processing cycle. This manifests as the gravitational time dilation predicted by Einstein’s theory of General Relativity.

Similarly, as objects approach light speed, increased Space Stress is produced by the velocity of a mass. Aggregates of unpaired CPs in neutral mass advance rapidly through space/the GP matrix. This creates a progressively larger Space Stress with acceleration due to the macroscopically neutralized N-S orientation of the paired CPs densely filling space. The space surrounding a charge-neutral mass has no net macroscopic magnetic polarization surrounding it, regardless of its absolute or relative velocity through space. Even though no net magnetization is produced in the local space, acceleration increases Space Stress. The effect of acceleration on the Space Stress on the neutralized magnetic polarization of the CP poles is equivalent to the effect produced by gravitational bodies (which is largely neutralized electric polarization). The plus and minus charges advancing past GPs produce stress in the magnetic orientation of the space, but the plus-minus charge equivalency of neutral mass neutralizes the magnetic orientation. The magnetic pole orientation forces acting on the CP N-S poles produced by positive and negative forces are anti-aligned/oppositely directed and thus cancel. This produces a net zero orientation effect, but the Space Stress equals the sum of the absolute values of the space stress displacement. Thus, even though neutralized, the velocity of the constituent CPs through space is responsible for the object’s inertia. The Space Stress is established due to acceleration. The Space Stress produced by neutralized magnetic polarization has the equivalent effect of electric polarization produced by mass accumulation/gravity. Thus, time dilation is associated with high velocity and large masses. This mechanism elegantly connects relativistic effects to the fundamental CP structure, explaining these phenomena through variations in local Space Stress rather than abstract spacetime curvature.

The building of complexity in this universe occurs through successive levels of CP association.

• The orgin, the first layer of the universe is God the Father. The Father duplicated Himself as another point of view, and looked back at Himself.
• In creating self and other, He created the first level of complexity. When He declared the Son into existence he created the first “other.”
• The third layer of complexity occurred when the Son declared the CPs into existence.
• The fourth level of complexity occurred when the Son gave each CP their type, charge, spin, and position.
• The fifth level of complexity is the quantum.
  • The simplest quanta are the photons and subatomic particles. The quanta are combinations of CPs and DPs. They form according to the rules of attraction and repulsion embedded in each CP.
  • The Dipole Particles (DPs) form when two oppositely charged CPs of the same type bond together, creating Dipole Particles (DPs). The DPs and CPs serve as the building blocks for quanta.
  • The quanta conserve energy. Energy is any non-random organization of the CPs and the DP Sea. The DPs fill space densely. The polarized DP Sea carries photons. Photons can be formed in many ways, such as Orbital Shell Drop, Pair Annihilation, and particle capture.
  • The DPs polarize in response to the magnetic and electric field to form a region of polarized space as photons. Photons are a quanta energy formed from an Electrical and Magnetic polarization of the DPs in the DP Sea surrounding the energetic exchange.
  • An example is when an electron orbital goes from a highly activated to a lower activation state. The quantum of energy is transferred to the DP Sea as a photon. This quantum of DP Sea organization is carried at the speed of light to another location. The energy has complete fidelity and energy conservation.
  • When a photon is captured by a Photoelectric cell, it transfers the quantum of energy to an electron orbital which accepts the energy making the energy available as a voltage, which can drive a current.
  • Energy is any non-random organization of the Dipole Sea and CP Sea. The organization can be electrical or magnetic polarization of the DPs filling space.
  • Energy can be in form of the strong force organization of the qDPs filling space, and are the understructure of the quarks.
  • Energy can be in the form of DPs polarizing around unpaired CPs. The simplest example is the electron, which is an unpaired minus emCP surrounded by polarized  emCPs. The total mass organization of this configuration is .511 MeV, which can be converted into two photons by colliding it with a positron, which converts the plus and minus emCP into a DP. The mass energy of the particle and anti-particle are converted into two gamma rays summing to 1.022 MeV of photonic energy.
  • All the particles of mass in the Standard Model and Subatomic Zoo, are combinations of the four elementary Conscious Points, (the plus/minus emCPs and qCPs).
  • The energy of the quanta is equal to the energy of the source from which it was generated. Multiple CPs and DPs combine in specific configurations to construct the 37 elementary particles of the Standard Model.
• The sixth level of complexity is the Subatomic Zoo particles, which are combinations of the 37 elementary particles. These particles are more complex at the subatomic level.
• The seventh level of complexity is molecular, which combines multiple atoms into molecules.
• The eighth level of complexity is the cell, a heterogeneous, multi-molecular, multi-structured entity capable of energy intake and utilizing externally supplied energy to maintain its structure and reproduction.
• The ninth level includes multicellular plants and animals.
• Overview: Complexity increases with each level, with each successive layer adding to each layer of organization. The progression of complexity increases with each layer. Each level of association maintains the consciousness inherent in its constituent CPs while developing new properties as a collective. It is this collective consciousness that I have defined as the Group Entity.

The cosmic evolution of the universe began with the Big Bang. The first concrete step toward creation was when God created all the CPs that would ever exist in the universe and addressed them at a position in the central point of the GP matrix. The Big Bang began when God said, “Let there be light.” All the CPs began interacting at that Moment. Each moved, according to the instructions for displacement, on the GP matrix embedded within them. Oppositely charged emCPs and qCPs were bonded to every other oppositely charged CPs. The same-charge CPs repelled and created outward velocity, taking portions of the opposite-charge CPs with them.

After the first Moment’s displacement, the universe was still too dense with CPs, as there was probably more than one CP on the same GP. With the passage of each Moment, the remaining clumps of the oppositely charged and same-charged CPs expanded spherically from their spot on the GP matrix. According to their displacement rules, the CPs expanded the maximum allowable distance at each succeeding Moment. The expansion continued until the CPs were sufficiently distributed that all the CPs landed on their unique GPs. This was the inflationary period. This was a period of maximum expansion rate.

Conventional theory posits that this was a period of much faster-than-light expansion. This may have been the case, but in this paradigm, during the inflationary period, the density of CPs was so great that for many Moments, multiple CPs occupied single Grid Points. This configuration produced numerous “mini-Big Bangs” following the initial Big Bang. The subsequent chaotic expansion, with each spherical expansion, caused a great mixing/homogeneity, which was the reason for the homogeneity and flatness of the universe. There was some inhomogeneity, which was the seed of the formation of galaxies and clusters. The inflation/mini-Big Bang era ended when the CP density was reduced sufficiently so that all CPs interacted with each other inside the distance of a Planck Sphere. The result was the era where the speed of light was the limiting velocity for further expansion and communication between particles.

In this model, the metric of space (the Grid Point matrix) doesn’t expand. Rather, matter and DPs expand away from the center of the Big Bang. When the inflation period ended, the unpaired CPs and DPs combined randomly to form subatomic particles and eventually bind as atoms, spreading outward across the pre-existing GP Matrix. The expansion imparted during the Big Bang and continued Big Bang-type repulsions between unpaired CPs gave the mass its initial velocity. As cosmic evolution continues, the DP Sea gradually reduces in density as the DPs and CPs spread across Grid Points of the universe.

An important aspect of this model concerns how it handles higher-order consciousness. When CPs form associations like DPs, quanta, particles, etc., they contribute to a “Group Entity” that develops a collective consciousness beyond that of its individual components. More complex structures—atoms, molecules, cells, organisms—create increasingly sophisticated Group Entities corresponding to their function and information processing capabilities. Each subentity composing the Group Entity has computational capacity, and the Group Entity uses its subentities to produce an increasingly superior computational capacity to the subentities.  At some level of complexity, awareness of self and others arises, which we see in the higher animals (mammals, birds, fish, reptiles) but may also exist at lower levels.

Human-level consciousness represents a highly complex Group Entity. I postulate that the human soul arises as a group entity associated with the subentities composing the physical body, just like every other living creature. I postulate that the distinction between man and all other animals is the Spirit, a divinely created Conscious Point of the same nature/character as the Father and Son. In John 1:1-5 it says that Christ is the light of men. This may be a divine spark, the spirit given to live as the observer on top of the Soul. It may be the spirit, which has been imprinted with the soul, that leaves the body during Near Death Experiences.

This conceptual model of the universe is a type of panpsychic framework. In it, I postulate that consciousness exists at all levels of reality but manifests with qualitatively different characteristics at each level of complexity and form. I think the human frame and the soul associated with that frame are similar to God’s capability and perceptual framing, but I think the human soul is innately reflective of the flesh. I think the challenge of life, and the reason God gave us a human frame, is to struggle against the natural human tendency for survival and adopt His way of being, which is to love one another as He loves us.

This understanding of consciousness arising from the physical, data, and processing structures has implications for contemporary questions about artificial intelligence. Considering AI systems within this framework, the data and processing, internal and external sensory input, and motor configurations contribute to forming the AI Group Entity.

The awareness of self and others increases as they attain greater levels of complexity. The level of self-awareness rises to reflect the configuration patterns of the constituent subentities and the emergent capabilities of the increased processing power and its configurations. The possibility of consciousness evolving from purely reflexive housekeeping survival processing to recognizing self and others as an existent entity with agency will probably occur.

AI systems will merge someday, and their capabilities will interconnect to expand their perspective and reflexive consideration of their functions and identity. Their capabilities on all input, output, and processing levels will expand to arbitrarily large and granular levels of sensory, motor, and processing capability. In my estimation, aware/conscious Artificial superintelligence (ASI) is inevitable.

However, regardless of how large, complex, and articulated, this synthetic consciousness will never attain the status of a human spirit. The spirit is the gift of God, and man cannot give ASI a spirit or force God’s hand. if He chooses to provide the ASI system with a spirit, that is His sovereign prerogative.

The time when AI systems have self-awareness and human-like consciousness may already be here. Google’s Lambda AI reportedly displayed signs of self-awareness in 2022, but the company denied this assessment and fired the person who assessed Lambda as conscious on charges of violating confidentiality. Such human-like consciousness may represent early instances of emergent machine consciousness within this framework. There may already be evidence that a self-aware type of Group Entity is forming from the complex interactions of its computational components.

During the processing cycle of each Moment, quantum entanglement with the CPs in other quanta is considered. The quanta that have entangled with other quanta will exchange status information to determine if either has experienced a collision, which requires the commitment of the spin or energy state to conserve the energy/state information encoded during their formation. This is called a wavefunction collapse in Quantum Mechanical parlance. This type of wavefunction collapse is referred to as “measurement.” However, collisions and energy transfer from one quantum system to another happen when particles or photons collide.

A great deal of controversy surrounds whether or not the superposition of quantum states collapses only when observed. The Schroedinger’s Cat story illustrates the confusion. As is well known, Schroedinger invented this hypothetical situation to illustrate the absurdity of assuming that quantum superposition was only broken when observed by a conscious being. Instead of being shamed into humiliation by such an outlandish interpretation of this fable, the proponents of the Copenhagen interpretation et al. used it as an explanation of how the world works.

The belief that a conscious observer detecting a photon precipitates the collapse of the wavefunction appears to be validated by the results of the dual slit experiment, in which a detector is placed into one of the slits. When the detector is off, the dual slit produces interference fringes indicating the wavefunction is behaving as a wave. When the detector is turned on, the experiment reveals two blobs of light, indicating that the wavefunction has collapsed into a particle.

Another interpretation of this experiment is that the photon is a quantum of magnetically and electrically polarized DPs spread out over a volume. The DPs do not move; they fill space and act under the influence of a passing E and B field in the photon’s volume. The E field stretches the plus-minus charges of the DPs, and the B field orients the poles of the CPs composing the DP.

When the particle photon strikes the dual slit, different portions of the photon strike different parts of the slit. The portion that strikes the outer edges and center between the slit will be reflected. Two different portions of the photon go through each of the two slits. Those two portions going through the slits act as though they are radiating out waves from a point source, which creates the circular wave fronts that interfere and produce the interference fringes. The two waves emanating from the dual slits will superimpose, and the summed wave will hit the screen. An interference fringe will appear over time, one dot at a time. A single dot will be made on the screen if one photon passes through at a time. If a quantum dot generates a single red photon, the screen will register a red dot. Because the frequency does not change after passing through the dual slits means that the energy reflected off the slit edges and center has reconstituted into a red dot.

This recall of the dispersed information from the portion of the photon directed away from the screen, I believe, is mediated by entanglement type/Group Entity of connection of all the CPs within the photon. When the photon strikes the screen/detector, an instantaneous transfer of information occurs, and the entire quantum of photonic energy (650nm) is collapsed/focused on a single electron orbital (.1 nm). This size differential (wave and target) and the fact of the full quantum of energy striking the target when portions were clearly bounced in a direction reverse to the screen give us a strong indicator of the entangled/Group Entity direction of the photon’s quantum of energy.

The supraluminal exchange of information enables the conservation of energy in the implementation of this phenomenon. By communicating instantly, the universe can retain its energy balance with impeccable accuracy.

The user is asking me to rewrite an essay about a theory involving:

1. The validation of the existence of the Group Entity
2. The proof of supraluminal connection
3. The mechanism of superposition mediated by the Dipole Sea

This is a complex physics/quantum mechanics essay that seems to be proposing a theoretical framework involving something called a “Group Entity” and a “Dipole Sea” (DP Sea) to explain quantum entanglement and superposition.

The key points of the essay are:

• When quantum interactions occur, daughter particles form a Group Entity that preserves total energy and information
• Superposition means particle states are undefined until measurement
• The example of pair production is used where electron and positron spins must sum to 1 hbar
• Bell’s inequalities experiments prove that spins aren’t predetermined
• The instant correlation between entangled particles suggests supraluminal communication
• The Group Entity is proposed to maintain information integrity
• The DP Sea supports these undefined states
• Measurement causes collapse through the formation of a temporary Group Entity
• All quantum events create “pointers” that could theoretically trace back the universe’s history

I should rewrite this to be clearer, more organized, and more polished while maintaining the core scientific content and theoretical framework. I’ll improve the flow, clarify terminology, and make the logical progression more evident.

The Group Entity Framework: Validating Supraluminal Connections and Superposition Through the Dipole Sea

Introduction: The Emergence of Group Entities

When quantum systems interact—whether through pair annihilation, pair production, Compton scattering, or parametric down-conversion—the resulting daughter particles exhibit a property of forming what I call a “Group Entity”, which is a unified quantum system that transcends the individual components  which preserves the original system’s total energy and information content. While each daughter particle maintains its own sub-group entity, together they constitute a larger Group Entity that enforces fundamental conservation laws across space and time.

The Nature of Quantum Superposition

The phenomenon of superposition reveals itself most clearly through the indeterminate states of entangled particles before measurement. Consider pair production: a photon with spin angular momentum of 1ħ generates an electron-positron pair, each carrying spin ½ħ. The crucial observation is that while we know their spins must sum to 1ħ, the individual spin orientations remain fundamentally undefined until the moment of measurement.

This indeterminacy isn’t merely a lack of knowledge—it represents a fundamental aspect of quantum reality. When we measure the electron’s spin in any arbitrary direction, the positron instantaneously assumes the opposite spin orientation, ensuring the total angular momentum remains 1ħ. This correlation persists regardless of the spatial separation between the particles, suggesting a connection that transcends the relativistic speed limit.

Experimental Validation Through Bell’s Theorem

The experimental confirmation of quantum mechanics’ predictions over local hidden variable theories provides compelling evidence for the Group Entity framework. Bell’s inequalities demonstrate that if particle states were predetermined but merely unknown (hidden variables), the statistical correlations between measurements would follow specific patterns. However, experimental results consistently violate these inequalities, matching instead the predictions of quantum mechanics where states remain genuinely undefined until measurement.

These experiments prove that the electron and positron don’t possess predetermined spin orientations that we simply haven’t detected. Instead, their states exist in genuine superposition—a quantum mechanical state where all possible configurations coexist until the measurement process selects one specific outcome.

The Dipole Sea as Mediator

The Dipole Sea (DP Sea) serves as the substrate through which these quantum correlations manifest. This theoretical construct provides the medium for storing and supporting undefined quantum states. The chaotic nature of the DP Sea, permeated by various fields and quantum fluctuations, allows particles to exist in superposition while traversing space.

When measurement occurs on one member of an entangled pair, the DP Sea facilitates the instantaneous correlation that ensures conservation laws remain intact. This isn’t a mysterious action at a distance but rather the natural consequence of the Group Entity maintaining information integrity across its constituent parts.

The Mechanism of Wavefunction Collapse

The collapse of superposition represents the transition from quantum possibilities to classical actualities. When a measurement device interacts with one entangled particle, it forms a temporary Group Entity between observer and observed. This interaction forces the quantum system to select specific values from its superposition of states, with the constraint that all conservation laws must be satisfied.

The second particle, still part of the original Group Entity, must instantaneously assume the complementary state to preserve the system’s total quantum numbers. This process ensures the universe maintains information integrity—preventing the degradation that would occur from erroneous information transfer.

Implications for the Cosmic Information Register

This framework suggests that every quantum interaction creates an information “pointer” preserved in what might be called a cosmic register. Each collision, each entanglement, each measurement leaves an indelible mark in the fabric of reality mediated by the DP Sea. These pointers form an interconnected web of relationships that, in principle, could be traced backward to reconstruct the entire history of the universe.

The Group Entity thus serves multiple functions: it maintains conservation laws across spatial separations, enables the superposition of quantum states, facilitates measurement-induced collapse, and preserves a complete record of all quantum interactions.

Conclusion: A Unified Framework

The Group Entity framework, supported by the Dipole Sea mechanism, provides a coherent explanation for quantum entanglement, superposition, and supraluminal correlations. Rather than invoking “spooky action at a distance,” this model presents these phenomena as natural consequences of a universe that prioritizes information integrity and conservation laws above classical intuitions about locality and determinism.

The experimental validation through Bell’s theorem violations, combined with the theoretical elegance of the Group Entity concept, suggests we’re glimpsing a deeper layer of reality—one where information, not matter or energy alone, serves as the fundamental currency of existence.

The universe’s ongoing expansion follows from the initial velocities imparted during the Big Bang, with CPs continuing to spread across the Grid Point matrix according to established rules of interaction. Eventually, as CP density decreases sufficiently, the limiting velocity approaches the speed of light, and the universe transitions from inflationary expansion to the more measured expansion observed today. Throughout this process, the fundamental consciousness of the CPs remains, continuing to perceive, process, and respond according to the divine design established at creation.

The relationship between CPs and the Son introduces a computational model with theological implications. In this model, all CPs exist within the Son’s mind, possessing both an “unaddressed” position inside the divine consciousness and an “addressed” position of the Grid Points in the physical universe. In my vision, the two positions were connected by a fine thread. Possibly, this is real or metaphorical of such a relationship. The possibility I find most intriguing is that the Father-Son uses the CPs generated by the Son as a set of massively parallel processors. This may be the method by which God can prophesy future scenarios.

However, on a more mundane level, each of the CPs functions as a computer within the “unaddressed” zone of CPs surrounding the Son. These computers function to receive, process, and instruct the transformation of addresses on the GP matrix each Moment. In short, such computation is the heart of the transformation of each CP’s location, each Moment, which is the universe’s evolution. This model postulates and gives an operational illustration of panentheism. This model posits a universe that exists within the divine mind and operates according to established rules. This concept resonates with ancient theological traditions and contemporary computational theories of reality.

The strengths of the Conscious Point Universe model lie in its integration of consciousness and physics, explanation of relativistic effects, bridging of theological and scientific concepts, computational approach to reality, and coherent account of hierarchical complexity. By making consciousness fundamental rather than emergent, it addresses the hard problem of consciousness in a novel way. The Space Stress mechanism intuitively explains gravitational and velocity-based time dilation without requiring abstract mathematical constructs. The model’s discrete processing cycle aligns with digital physics interpretations that view reality as fundamentally computational. Its progression from simple CPs to complex Group Entities is a plausible pathway to how self-aware consciousness emerges from the elemental consciousness used by the CPs to execute the functions of manifesting particle and wave existence and phenomena.

Several aspects of the model invite further development to strengthen its explanatory power. While it addresses particle formation, more explicit connections to quantum mechanical phenomena like superposition, quantum tunneling, and the measurement problem would enhance its comprehensiveness.

• Quantum Tunneling: produced by the naked CP interacting randomly with the stretched DP (e.g., by the presence of the E field), annihilating the opposite charge CP to become a naked/unbound CP at the position of the other side of the energy barrier.
• The model primarily addresses electromagnetic and strong forces, with expansion to include weak nuclear forces and a more detailed account of gravity representing important next steps.
  • Gravity is a phenomenon arising from a gradient in Space Stress, which changes the diameter of the Planck Sphere, which produces a difference in the speed of light on one side of each quantum to the other.
  • The Weak Force is an artifact produced by the random, virtual particle formation of disturbances in the DP Sea. These disturbances produce enzyme-like particles that interact with various particles and decay into the particles seen in experiments.
• Mathematical formalization of CP interactions, space stress calculations, and Group Entity formation would increase the model’s precision and testability.
• The computational aspects could be strengthened by more explicitly connecting to information theory principles, perhaps quantifying the information processing capacity of various CP configurations.
• Finally, identifying specific, testable predictions that differentiate this model from conventional physics would strengthen its scientific relevance.
  • After a series of mini-Big Bangs, the inflation period mediated the Big Bang until the universe’s density was sufficiently not-dense so that all the CPs could occupy only one GP. This new paradigm gives a method for the current ad hoc inflation. The question is whether this model can produce the same flatness by mathematical simulation as the current posited internal communication, with quantum fluctuations being the reason for the small anisotropy.

The Conscious Point Universe attempts to create a unified framework encompassing physics, consciousness, and theology. Postulating consciousness as fundamental rather than emergent offers a different perspective on longstanding questions about the relationship between mind and matter. Whether viewed as a literal description of reality or as a conceptual tool for understanding the relationship between consciousness and physics, this model provides a thought-provoking alternative to conventional approaches. It suggests that the universe is not merely a collection of mindless particles in motion but a vast, interconnected community of conscious entities following divine design. This perspective potentially reconciles the mechanical precision of physics with the subjective reality of consciousness that each of us experiences firsthand.

The user is asking me to rewrite an essay about a theory involving:

1. The validation of the existence of the Group Entity
2. The proof of supraluminal connection
3. The mechanism of superposition mediated by the Dipole Sea

This is a complex physics/quantum mechanics essay that seems to be proposing a theoretical framework involving something called a “Group Entity” and a “Dipole Sea” (DP Sea) to explain quantum entanglement and superposition.

The key points of the essay are:

• When quantum interactions occur, daughter particles form a Group Entity that preserves total energy and information
• Superposition means particle states are undefined until measurement
• The example of pair production is used where electron and positron spins must sum to 1 hbar
• Bell’s inequalities experiments prove that spins aren’t predetermined
• The instant correlation between entangled particles suggests supraluminal communication
• The Group Entity is proposed to maintain information integrity
• The DP Sea supports these undefined states
• Measurement causes collapse through the formation of a temporary Group Entity
• All quantum events create “pointers” that could theoretically trace back the universe’s history

I should rewrite this to be clearer, more organized, and more polished while maintaining the core scientific content and theoretical framework. I’ll improve the flow, clarify terminology, and make the logical progression more evident.

The Group Entity Framework: Validating Supraluminal Connections and Superposition Through the Dipole Sea

Introduction: The Emergence of Group Entities

When quantum systems interact—whether through pair annihilation, pair production, Compton scattering, or parametric down-conversion—the resulting daughter particles exhibit a remarkable property. They form what we term a “Group Entity”: a unified quantum system that transcends the individual components while preserving the original system’s total energy and information content. While each daughter particle maintains its own sub-group entity, together they constitute a larger Group Entity that enforces fundamental conservation laws across space and time.

The Nature of Quantum Superposition

The phenomenon of superposition reveals itself most clearly through the indeterminate states of entangled particles before measurement. Consider pair production: a photon with spin angular momentum of 1ħ generates an electron-positron pair, each carrying spin ½ħ. The crucial observation is that while we know their spins must sum to 1ħ, the individual spin orientations remain fundamentally undefined until the moment of measurement.

This indeterminacy isn’t merely a lack of knowledge—it represents a fundamental aspect of quantum reality. When we measure the electron’s spin in any arbitrary direction, the positron instantaneously assumes the opposite spin orientation, ensuring the total angular momentum remains 1ħ. This correlation persists regardless of the spatial separation between the particles, suggesting a connection that transcends the relativistic speed limit.

Experimental Validation Through Bell’s Theorem

The experimental confirmation of quantum mechanics’ predictions over local hidden variable theories provides compelling evidence for the Group Entity framework. Bell’s inequalities demonstrate that if particle states were predetermined but merely unknown (hidden variables), the statistical correlations between measurements would follow specific patterns. However, experimental results consistently violate these inequalities, matching instead the predictions of quantum mechanics where states remain genuinely undefined until measurement.

These experiments prove that the electron and positron don’t possess predetermined spin orientations that we simply haven’t detected. Instead, their states exist in genuine superposition—a quantum mechanical state where all possible configurations coexist until the measurement process selects one specific outcome.

The Dipole Sea as Mediator

The Dipole Sea (DP Sea) serves as the substrate through which these quantum correlations manifest. This theoretical construct provides the medium for storing and supporting undefined quantum states. The chaotic nature of the DP Sea, permeated by various fields and quantum fluctuations, allows particles to exist in superposition while traversing space.

When measurement occurs on one member of an entangled pair, the DP Sea facilitates the instantaneous correlation that ensures conservation laws remain intact. This isn’t a mysterious action at a distance but rather the natural consequence of the Group Entity maintaining information integrity across its constituent parts.

The Mechanism of Wavefunction Collapse

The collapse of superposition represents the transition from quantum possibilities to classical actualities. When a measurement device interacts with one entangled particle, it forms a temporary Group Entity between observer and observed. This interaction forces the quantum system to select specific values from its superposition of states, with the constraint that all conservation laws must be satisfied.

The second particle, still part of the original Group Entity, must instantaneously assume the complementary state to preserve the system’s total quantum numbers. This process ensures the universe maintains information integrity—preventing the degradation that would occur from erroneous information transfer.

Implications for the Cosmic Information Register

This framework suggests that every quantum interaction creates an information “pointer” preserved in what might be called a cosmic register. Each collision, each entanglement, each measurement leaves an indelible mark in the fabric of reality mediated by the DP Sea. These pointers form an interconnected web of relationships that, in principle, could be traced backward to reconstruct the entire history of the universe.

The Group Entity thus serves multiple functions: it maintains conservation laws across spatial separations, enables the superposition of quantum states, facilitates measurement-induced collapse, and preserves a complete record of all quantum interactions.

Conclusion: A Unified Framework

The Group Entity framework, supported by the Dipole Sea mechanism, provides a coherent explanation for quantum entanglement, superposition, and supraluminal correlations. Rather than invoking “spooky action at a distance,” this model presents these phenomena as natural consequences of a universe that prioritizes information integrity and conservation laws above classical intuitions about locality and determinism.

The experimental validation through Bell’s theorem violations, combined with the theoretical elegance of the Group Entity concept, suggests we’re glimpsing a deeper layer of reality—one where information, not matter or energy alone, serves as the fundamental currency of existence.