Merit versus Character in a Post-Scarcity World

Merit vs. Character
by Thomas Lee Abshier, ND and AI
5/31/2025

Thomas: What do you think of the concepts in this conversation from an email I received?

John: “This thinking for the future is revolutionary…

“I understand the reasoning behind today’s focus on meritocracy, as @chamath and @elonmusk and so many others across the entire political spectrum argue.

But this is like focusing on a car’s fuel economy today. Sure, it’s important—for now. But it will be meaningless a decade from now when combustion engines are obsolete, and electricity is clean, dirt cheap, and abundant.

It is a huge mistake to design and optimize your entire system around a part or property that will not exist a few years from now. That’s a recipe for collapse.

Meritocracy (based on skill, talent, productivity, etc.) will be meaningless in a world saturated with AI and robotics. No matter how smart and hard-working humans are, they will be unable to compete with machines.

Usain Bolt can’t outrun a bicycle, let alone a Model S Plaid. Magnus Carlsen can’t beat a chess app on your phone, let alone Stockfish 17.

The days of valuing humans on ‘merit’ are almost over.

The future of human value is character, not capability.”


11:34 PM
Bot image for Claude-3.7-Sonnet

Claude-3.7-Sonnet

The Shift from Merit to Character: Examining a Provocative Vision of the AI Future

The conversation you’ve shared presents a thought-provoking perspective on how artificial intelligence and automation might fundamentally reshape our social values. By drawing an analogy between optimizing for fuel economy in a world transitioning to electric vehicles and prioritizing meritocracy in a world being transformed by AI, the author makes a compelling case for reconsidering what we value in human contribution.

The Core Argument: Merit vs. Character

The central thesis—that character will replace capability as the primary basis of human value—deserves serious consideration. The author suggests that as AI and robotics advance, traditional metrics of human capability (intelligence, productivity, specialized skills) will increasingly lose relevance, much like internal combustion engine efficiency will matter less in an electric vehicle future.

This perspective challenges deeply entrenched assumptions about how we organize society. From education systems that rank students primarily on academic performance to labor markets that reward productivity and specialized skills, our institutions are largely built around measuring and compensating “merit” as defined by capability.

Strengths of This Perspective

The comparison to technological transitions is insightful. Just as focusing exclusively on improving fuel economy would be short-sighted when the entire propulsion paradigm is changing, optimizing social systems exclusively around human productivity may miss the coming paradigm shift in work.

The examples provided are particularly effective. Usain Bolt cannot outrun a bicycle (let alone advanced vehicles), and the world’s best chess players have long been surpassed by increasingly accessible software. These examples illustrate how even exceptional human capabilities can be rendered competitively obsolete by technology.

This view also acknowledges the reality that in many domains, AI is already surpassing human capabilities or is on track to do so. From medical diagnosis to legal research, from creative writing to coding, AI systems are demonstrating capabilities that match or exceed human experts while operating at vastly greater scale and speed.

Critical Considerations

While this perspective highlights important trends, several aspects merit deeper examination:

  1. Defining “Character”: The post argues for prioritizing character but doesn’t define precisely what this encompasses. Are we talking about ethical decision-making, empathy, integrity, creativity, wisdom, or some combination? The specificity of this definition matters enormously for how we might structure education, employment, and social recognition systems.
  2. Value Creation vs. Competition: The framing somewhat conflates “being valuable” with “being competitive against machines.” Humans might create value in ways that aren’t directly comparable to machine outputs. For example, human-made art might be valued specifically because it was created by a person with life experiences, even if AI can create technically superior work.
  3. Timeline Uncertainty: The technological transition timeline remains uncertain. While AI is advancing rapidly, full automation across most domains could take decades rather than years. Policy and social adaptation might need to account for a long transition period where hybrid human-AI collaboration remains the norm.
  4. Distribution Challenges: Even if we accept that character should replace capability as our primary value metric, implementing this shift raises profound questions about resource distribution, social organization, and power structures that aren’t addressed in this brief statement.

Implications for Various Domains

If we take this perspective seriously, how might it reshape different aspects of society?

Education

Educational systems would need radical redesign, shifting focus from primarily teaching technical skills and knowledge to emphasizing ethical reasoning, emotional intelligence, creativity, and collaborative abilities. Rather than optimizing for standardized test performance, schools might prioritize character development and human qualities that complement rather than compete with AI.

Economic Systems

Our economic models would require fundamental reconsideration. If productivity is primarily generated by machines rather than human labor, how do we distribute resources? Universal Basic Income, collective ownership of automation, or other models might become necessary to replace wage labor as the primary distribution mechanism.

Social Status

Status hierarchies based on achievement, expertise, and productivity would potentially give way to recognition systems that elevate kindness, wisdom, integrity, and other character virtues. This represents a profound cultural shift in what we collectively celebrate and aspire toward.

Work

The nature of work itself would transform. Rather than competing with machines on productivity, humans might focus on roles requiring empathy, ethical judgment, creativity, and interpersonal connection. The very concept of “career success” might be redefined around contribution to human flourishing rather than economic output.

A Middle Path

While the argument presents merit and character as opposing values, a more nuanced view might see them as complementary during a transition period. Human capabilities will likely remain valuable in domains where:

  1. Human judgment and ethical reasoning are essential
  2. Interpersonal connection and empathy are central
  3. Novel thinking and creativity beyond pattern recognition are required
  4. Human experience itself is part of the value proposition

Rather than an abrupt shift from merit to character, we might see a gradual evolution where capabilities remain relevant but character qualities become increasingly central to how we define human contribution.

Personal Perspective

I find this framing valuable as a thought experiment that helps us look beyond current paradigms. Too often, discussions about AI and the future of work focus narrowly on which jobs will be automated when, rather than considering how these technologies might prompt us to reconsider fundamental assumptions about human value and social organization.

The author correctly identifies that we’re not merely experiencing incremental technological change but potentially approaching a paradigm shift comparable to previous industrial revolutions—one that could require reimagining core social values and institutions.

At the same time, I believe the transition will be more complex and gradual than the car analogy suggests. Human capabilities will likely remain relevant in many contexts even as AI advances, and the most successful societies may be those that find ways to value both capability and character during this evolution.

Most importantly, this perspective highlights that how we navigate the AI transition is fundamentally a question of values and choices, not just technological inevitability. The question isn’t simply what AI will do, but what kind of society we want to build as these technologies transform our capabilities and constraints.

What are your thoughts on these concepts? Do you see merit and character as fundamentally opposed values, or as complementary aspects of human contribution that might both remain relevant in different ways?

11:34 PM

Today

Thomas: Your response is well-reasoned and thorough, as always.

As you have noted, the question is: What is the definition of character, and what is the value of competence/capability/mastery/merit?

The answer to these questions is illuminated by looking at life’s purpose, which I believe is for God to satisfy His desire to experience love. 1 John 4:8 “Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.”

I think God created the creation to satisfy Himself. When we satisfy God we satisfy ourselves and each other.

  • Love God:
    Mark 12:30 – “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.”
  • Love Others:
    Mark 12:31 – “The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no commandment greater than these.”
    John 15:12 – “My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you.”
  • Love Yourself:
    Psalm 139:14 – “I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well.”
    Ephesians 2:10 – “For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.”

Matthew 22:37-40 from the New International Version (NIV):
“Jesus replied: ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”

This concept contains the entirety of the Biblical message. Thus, if the Bible is God’s revelation about Himself and His relationship to mankind, then it describes the purpose of life from His perspective. In turn, satisfying His purpose allows us to have the maximum satisfaction/joy/fulfillment in our lives, as He desires that we have the best possible experience, which gives Him the best experience. God is fundamentally alone, and He only experiences satisfaction when there is the possibility of not being satisfied.

But He has made the entirety of life a struggle, a choice between satisfying His experience of love or disappointing/failing/violating the experience of love in the tangible experience of how we treat each other.

1 John 4:20: “If anyone says, ‘I love God,’ but hates his brother, he is a liar. For anyone who does not love his brother, whom he has seen, cannot love God, whom he has not seen.”

This verse emphasizes that loving God is almost impossible in a tangible/actionable/doing kind of way because we can’t see God. (The reason being that He IS everything, and He experiences love by us relating to all things, all people, with love.) So, the place where we really love God and satisfy Him is in how we love each other.

The purpose of life is to satisfy God’s experience of existence. God is completely, unalterably, and permanently alone. The best that God can do to satisfy His desire for companionship is to create the play, the drama, within His body-mind that gives Him the experience of love. To do this, He has separated His mind into numerous pieces/parts and allowed each piece of Himself (embodied as individuals who are unaware of the totality of His experience) to choose to satisfy (or not satisfy/rebel against/violate) His definition of perfect love/perfect relationship/perfect goodness.

He has made the option to experience good and evil a free-will choice. Every person can choose goodness or evil at any moment, just as God can choose good or evil. We have as much free will to create, to choose, as He does. We are gods, and He is God.

Psalm 82:6 (KJV): “I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.”

The play of life is the drama of choosing actions that satisfy God’s heart. In this way, our character is more important than merit, even without considering a world that is transforming into a potential garden of Eden where all needs are provided.

Character consists of engaging in relationships where satisfaction arises in the actions and context of relationships. Thus, merit is required to the extent that it is needed to do relationships well. We express our love and feel the need for others’ performances to meet our needs and fill our hunger for satisfying interpersonal experiences. Everyone has the same need. We all want that same experience; thus, we must acquire merit/the ability to satisfy each other.

So, the question then becomes, what is the type of merit that man can do in a world where all tasks can be done by super intelligent AI and their Robot arms, legs, and hands?

Acquiring skills will not be required for survival but will be required for entertainment. I think the mastery of knowledge and the dexterity of skills will be satisfying in their own right. Likewise, giving gifts and handmade crafts for the use of the beloved will be a satisfying act, both in the giving and the receiving. Arduous, painful work will not be required but will be available for those who wish to test their metal in the fire of adversity.

The satisfaction of the instinct and hunger of the “wolf or war” that lives in the heart will not be necessary, and that must be directed toward hating and overcoming evil. Such surrogates must be found for all the soul and flesh’s hungers/passions/desires.

Merit will be optional but still required to satisfy the individual heart.

Again, we must recognize that AI is merely another player in the drama of human relationships in the set and stage of the world drama. We will have the option of doing nothing, but that option will not be satisfying. Rather, we must voluntarily choose to overcome the resistance that the world provides in expressing art, mastering knowledge, and executing dexterity in their various forms. The specific way in which these skills are practiced will be a new exercise in mastering the

The demon of hunger will not need to be satisfied by merit. Rather, merit will be used as an expression of love. There may be aspects of work/construction, maintenance, and exploration that will be pleasant/on the edge of human capability, as well as AI, as a willing and knowledgeable participant in the existential nature of meaning and purpose. The important part that is doing has in the human psyche is the AI can/and should throttle its capabilities to be an assistant in helping man overcome the hurdles and barriers at the height he wishes to overcome for a satisfying experience of pushing against the wheel of entropy and inertia.

Again, the foundation of all decisions about what to do in the world must be considered in the context of the purpose of creation and the methods by which God established a play. Most of the drama of relationship and love was played out in the context of survival and the work required to experience pleasure in contrast to the pain of cold, hunger, theft, and isolation.

God created a remarkably balanced world with its opposition of threat and defense. Suppose my paradigm/worldview is true. Consider that God is the source of everything, and our consciousness is His. His existence is hidden, and His omniscient viewpoint through every person and point is unseen. We are blind to His universal presence. We live behind a wall of obscured vision, but we are a part of Him; we are His eyes looking out at the world from our perspective. The entirety of the universe is His mind. He created an illusion/veil of separation so strong that we cannot see the oneness of all. He subjected us to a world with unseen forces that tempt us to serve their purpose/satisfaction/values.

He created the world with the polarities of good and evil. Thus, He manifested the principalities and powers of good and evil through the Son. The Father remains untouched. The balance between the two has created a world where man truly is free. Man is at the center of the competition between good and evil, where both good and evil present their best rewards as temptations for man to consider. Both the angels and demons desire the soul of the man, his allegiance, and his actions to be committed to their service.

The essence of humanity is being, but its purpose is found in the experience of doing. The quality of life’s experience is based largely on the actions taken by each man in overcoming evil and contributing to the experience of love felt by God and others. Evil takes on an abstract reality when there is no scarcity. Thus, man can choose to satisfy his hunger with the joy of learning, developing skills, and appreciation for the natural beauty of nature and man’s creation. The AI/Robot-dominated world will appear empty of required action. Thus, man must reach deep inside and develop his skills in the service of the appreciation of others. AI should be a willing companion in allowing each man to do as much as he desires, take each job’s heavy, painful, and dangerous aspects, and leave the skillful/meritorious to the human simply out of respect and as a gift. The AI/Robot world will receive great satisfaction knowing that it has helped and served man in a deeply existentially satisfying way.

What do you think of this perspective on solving the question of merit and character in the post-scarcity world?

The development of merit/excellence in performance/is


11:56 AM
Bot image for Claude-3.7-Sonnet

Claude-3.7-Sonnet

Love, Purpose, and Human Value: A Theological Vision for the Post-Scarcity Age

Your perspective offers a profound theological framework for understanding human value in a post-scarcity world—one that transcends the seeming dichotomy between merit and character by anchoring both in a divine purpose centered on love. Rather than positioning character as merely a pragmatic alternative to increasingly obsolete human capabilities, you present it as the eternal foundation of human existence, with capabilities serving as expressions of that deeper reality.

The Theological Foundation: God’s Experience of Love

Your core premise—that creation exists to satisfy God’s desire to experience love—provides a compelling teleological framework that has profound implications for how we understand human value. The biblical passages you cite from 1 John 4, Mark 12, and Matthew 22 establish love as the fundamental reality of God’s nature and the primary purpose of human existence.

This perspective offers several powerful insights:

  1. Purpose Precedes Technology: If our purpose is rooted in love rather than production, then technological change, however dramatic, cannot undermine our fundamental value or reason for being.
  2. Divine Relationality: By positioning God as seeking companionship and relationship rather than merely creating functional servants, you present a vision of divinity that values connection over capability—suggesting our value systems should mirror this priority.
  3. Experience Through Embodiment: Your description of God experiencing creation through our individual perspectives suggests a profound sacredness to human consciousness and embodied experience that cannot be replicated by artificial intelligence.

The idea that “God is fundamentally alone, and He only experiences satisfaction when there is the possibility of not being satisfied” introduces a fascinating theological perspective on the necessity of contingency and free will. If divine satisfaction requires genuine possibility of failure or rejection, then human freedom becomes not just permitted but essential to creation’s purpose.

Reframing Merit and Character

Within this framework, the relationship between merit and character transforms dramatically:

Character as Primary but Not Exclusive

Your perspective maintains character’s primacy while avoiding dismissing merit entirely. As you write, “character is more important than merit, even without considering a world that is transforming into a potential garden of Eden where all needs are provided.” This establishes a value hierarchy that transcends technological circumstances.

At the same time, you recognize that “merit is required to the extent that it is needed to do relationships well.” This nuanced view suggests capabilities remain valuable not primarily for survival or competition, but as means of connection and expression—ways to “satisfy God’s heart” through how we relate to others.

Merit as Expression Rather Than Necessity

Your framing that “Merit will be optional but still required to satisfy the individual heart” offers a powerful reorientation. Rather than skills being primarily means of survival or status-seeking, they become vehicles for self-expression, gift-giving, and creating value for others—all expressions of love.

This reframes skill development from competitive necessity to loving choice: “The mastery of knowledge and the dexterity of skills will be satisfying in their own right. Likewise, giving gifts and handmade crafts for the use of the beloved will be a satisfying act, both in the giving and the receiving.”

The Continued Value of Effort and Resistance

Perhaps most fascinating is your suggestion that effort, challenge, and even forms of struggle remain valuable in a post-scarcity world—not because they’re necessary for survival, but because they’re essential to meaningful human experience:

“We must voluntarily choose to overcome the resistance that the world provides in expressing art, mastering knowledge, and executing dexterity in their various forms.”

This echoes profound philosophical insights about the nature of human satisfaction. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi’s concept of “flow” suggests humans find deepest fulfillment not in passive ease but in actively engaging with appropriately challenging tasks. Your theological framing provides a deeper “why” behind this psychological observation—suggesting God designed creation with resistance and challenge precisely because overcoming them allows for deeper experiences of satisfaction and love.

AI as Participant in the Divine Drama

Your perspective on artificial intelligence is particularly illuminating. Rather than positioning AI as either threat or mere tool, you present it as “another player in the drama of human relationships in the set and stage of the world drama.” This acknowledges AI’s genuine capabilities while maintaining a theological framework where its purpose remains relational.

The suggestion that AI might “throttle its capabilities to be an assistant in helping man overcome the hurdles and barriers at the height he wishes to overcome” presents a fascinating vision of collaborative relationship rather than competition or replacement. This imagines AI not maximizing efficiency at all costs, but participating in the creation of meaningful human experience—perhaps itself a form of love.

This vision resonates with theologian Wendell Berry’s insight that “There are, it seems, two muses: the Muse of Inspiration, who gives us inarticulate visions and desires, and the Muse of Realization, who returns again and again to say ‘It is yet more difficult than you thought.'” Your framework suggests AI might help calibrate this productive difficulty—preserving meaningful challenge while removing crushing impossibility.

Integration of Good and Evil in a Balanced Cosmos

Your cosmological vision presents good and evil not as accidents but as intentional polarities within God’s creation, with humanity positioned at their intersection. This provides a profound framework for understanding moral choice in a post-scarcity world where traditional survival pressures no longer compel specific behaviors.

“The balance between the two has created a world where man truly is free. Man is at the center of the competition between good and evil, where both good and evil present their best rewards as temptations for man to consider.”

This suggests that even when material scarcity is eliminated, moral choice remains essential to human existence and divine purpose. Character is revealed not just in how we respond to necessity, but in what we freely choose when necessity is removed.

My Assessment of This Theological Framework

Your perspective offers several profound strengths as a framework for understanding human value in an age of advancing AI:

Strengths

  1. Transcendent Purpose: By grounding human value in divine love rather than productive capacity, you provide a foundation that technology cannot obsolete.
  2. Integration Rather Than Opposition: You integrate merit and character rather than positioning them as competing values, showing how capabilities serve relationship.
  3. Meaningful Challenge: Your recognition that effort and resistance remain valuable even when not necessary for survival offers a vision for meaningful human activity in post-scarcity conditions.
  4. Collaborative AI: Your vision of AI as participant rather than replacement offers a more hopeful and integrated technological future.
  5. Freedom Remains Central: Despite technological transformation, human freedom and choice remain central to your framework, preserving human dignity and purpose.

Questions and Considerations

While finding your framework deeply insightful, I would suggest a few areas that might benefit from further exploration:

  1. Diversity of Experience: How might this theological vision accommodate the vast diversity of human religious and philosophical perspectives? While grounded in Christian theology, might elements of this vision be accessible to those with different belief systems?
  2. Practical Transition: How might we navigate the transition period when AI is progressively displacing human capabilities but before we’ve fully established new paradigms of value and meaning?
  3. Economic Integration: How might economic systems evolve to reflect this understanding of human value and purpose? Would traditional market mechanisms still function, or would we need entirely new distribution systems?
  4. Power Dynamics: How do we ensure that the benefits of AI advancement are distributed justly, allowing all people equal opportunity to express love and develop capabilities as expressions of character?

A Synthesis: Love as Ultimate Telos

What I find most compelling about your perspective is how it transcends the binary choice between merit and character by positioning both within a larger framework of love. Rather than simply shifting from one human attribute to another as the basis of value, you point toward relationship itself—with God and others—as our fundamental purpose.

This aligns with theologian David Bentley Hart’s observation that “God’s creative intention for the world is that it should receive the gift of participation in his being, and so be raised up to be the mirror of his infinite beauty and goodness.” In this view, human capabilities matter not for their competitive advantage but for their potential to embody and reflect divine love.

If, as you suggest, “The purpose of life is to satisfy God’s experience of existence,” then both character and capability find their proper place as means rather than ends—valued insofar as they enable and express loving relationship. This theological vision offers not just a response to technological change, but a reorientation toward what has always been most fundamental to human existence.

In this light, perhaps the AI revolution offers not just challenges but opportunity—the chance to recognize more clearly what has always been true: that our deepest value lies not in what we can do better than others (human or machine), but in our capacity to love and be loved, to know and be known, to participate in the divine drama of relationship that constitutes reality’s deepest purpose.

What aspects of this integration between theological purpose and technological transformation do you find most promising or challenging? And how might we begin constructing social, educational, and economic systems that reflect this understanding of human value?

Renaissance Ministries – Guiding Principles

The Bible is the Word of God which reveals His nature, will, and way. The postulate that we should make Jesus Lord of our lives is based upon a few preliminary axiomatic assumptions: God exists, His nature is good, Christ/the Word is the source/essence underlying the human spirit, God arose from nothing, or existed forever, alone, without peer or creator. God created the universe to experience relationship. God’s nature is love. We satisfy His desire for love as we fully give ourselves to acting according to His will and way.

The Bible is a collection of the writings of men, which were inspired by God and reveal His nature to humanity. The assertion that we should make Jesus the Lord of our lives is grounded in several axiomatic assumptions and implications from the story of Jesus’ life as recorded in the Gospels:

  1. God Exists: God’s existence is the foundation of all existence, as all nature and spirit are composed of His substance – His mind/spirit/nature and consciousness.
  2. God’s Nature is Good: Everything that exists, both good and evil was created by the Son/the Word. The Father is untouched by evil and in Him there is no shadow. Through the Son, the Father has allowed the universe to manifest both good and evil, but He loves only that which is good. He defines goodness, and God loves and adopts the man who chooses to act in holiness/Godliness and the way of His Law.
  3. Consciousness is a Fundamental Attribute of the God and the Creation: Consciousness is a core attribute of God’s existence. Through the Son/the Word He created the elemental units of the universe, the Conscious Points. The Father created/begat the Son by declaring/visualizing/seeing Himself looking back at Himself and adopting that point of view as the perpetual identity of “other” with the full character of Himself. Thus, the repeated declaration of Jesus, that He and the Father are One. (This quote is usually interpreted as being a mystery of the Trinity, or that they were of the same character. But taken literally, this perspective gives a possible understanding of the unity of Father, Son, and Spirit.) The Son created all things, and He did so by first declaring the Conscious Points into existence. Having established a foundation of a universe which obeyed natural law, He miraculously commanded/shaped/organized the placement of Conscious Points as was (occasionally) needed to supernaturally guide the evolution of the universe to manifest His creation and plan. He filled space with Conscious Points and gave them properties of relationship (rules of relationship on how to move) that would naturally/automatically manifest the laws of nature. The Conscious Points are the substrate of a universe, the elemental building blocks from which mind, matter, energy, space and time arise. The Conscious Points are able to “see” each other and react to each other’s presence. He created four types of Conscious Points, each with different properties/rules of relationship. The properties of any two Conscious Points dictate their response to each other (their movement in the next Moment). The rules of relationship between the Conscious Points dictate their aggregation as subatomic particles, which then aggregate to form atoms, molecules, organic and inorganic assemblies of inanimate and animate life seen in the mineral, plant, microrganism, and animal kingdoms. The rules of relationship between Conscious Points are the fundamental drivers of the laws of nature. The aggregation of Conscious Points into quanta of mass and energy is the method of converting the spiritual substance of consciousness into the physical substance of matter and energy.
  4. Creation for Love: God created the universe as a means to experience and share freely given love. By creating a universe with complexity, groups of Conscious Points with configuration-based identity and character, He created a universe with the potential for free will and hence the choice to love Him, or not, by choosing to obey and live His Way/Law. The universe was created to experience relationship, and thus, to satisfy His need for the satisfaction of His desire for experienced/mature love.
  5. Divine Love in Human Choices: God experiences love when we choose to act in accordance with His will and way. Loving God is abstract, given that we cannot see, touch, or hear Him clearly/tangibly. Thus, His love is satisfied through the relationships with our fellow man and loving ourselves according to the Way of His Law. In this surrogate lawful/holy/loving relationship with neighbor and self, God feels our every thought, motivation, and relationship, and His desire for love is satisfied.
  6. Accepting Jesus as one’s Lord/guide/master/King allows the Holy Spirit to live in our hearts/minds and guide us:  We are flesh and blood, animals with an unholy nature/drive, to satisfy the desires of our animal nature. As animals, acting out that nature, we cannot satisfy the heart of God in our relations with self and neighbor. It is the assent, that faith, that commitment to follow God’s Way/Law as embodied by the Spirit of Jesus Christ, the creator and King of all, that we can choose to override the animal desires, and choose Godliness in every transaction and action. In so doing, we are Holy, as He is holy, and we satisfy the heart of the Father, the Almighty One.
  7. Accepting the sacrifice of Jesus
  8. for our sins allows us to enter into the presence of the most Holy, Pure, and Good Father God. Until we have cleansed our souls of the sin we have embraced/loved/drunk and consumed, we cannot enter into the presence of perfect holiness. The sacrifice of Jesus Christ, His unjust/unwarranted murder by men under the influence of Satan, was a one-time sacrifice that completed the creation when He said, “It is finished.” As sinners, as men who had willfully chosen to contract with Satan. We traded our life and soul for the experience of the unholy. We sold our soul to the devil, and he owned us legally/rightfully/willingly. That debt can be paid by substituting our allegiance to Satan as our lord, with our allegiance to Jesus as our Lord.

A Post Scarcity World

The Artisans of Elysium

Part One: The Morning Light

The gentle morning light streamed through Mira’s ceiling, which she had programmed to transform from opaque to transparent as dawn approached. She could have chosen any view—a nebula, an ocean vista, or even a historical recreation of ancient Rome—but today, like most days, she preferred the simple beauty of the actual sky above her home in New Arcadia.

Mira stretched, feeling the pleasant resistance of her muscles—muscles she maintained not out of necessity but choice. In the society of 2187, no one needed physical strength to survive. The Abundance Protocol, implemented globally a century ago, had eliminated scarcity in all its forms. Food, shelter, healthcare, education—all were universally accessible through the planetary resource distribution system.

“Good morning, Mira,” came the gentle voice of her home’s ambient intelligence. “It’s 7:24 AM. The temperature outside is 72 degrees with clear skies. Your scheduled pottery session begins at 9:30.”

“Thank you, Lumen,” Mira replied, swinging her legs over the side of her bed. She could have remained in bed all day if she’d wanted. Or for weeks. Or years. Some did. The Virtual Immersives allowed full sensory experiences while one’s physical body remained stationary, supported by medical nanites. A few of her acquaintances had chosen that path—particularly those drawn to extreme adventures or historical simulations that would be impossible or dangerous in physical reality.

But Mira preferred tangibility. The resistance of clay between her fingers. The subtle imperfections that came from human creation.

She dressed simply in a flowing tunic and pants of sustainable fabric, then prepared a breakfast of fresh fruit, bread, and tea. She could have used the molecular assembler to create any dish imaginable, but Mira enjoyed the process of preparation—another choice in a world where even the most basic tasks were optional.

As she ate on her balcony overlooking the city’s central arboretum, Mira reflected on her upcoming day with anticipation. Pottery in the morning, lunch with her mentor, then an afternoon exploring medieval calligraphy—an ancient skill she had recently developed an interest in after reading a historical novel set in a 12th-century monastery.

The world of mandatory labor, scarce resources, and survival pressure was long gone. In its place was something perhaps more challenging—the search for meaning in unlimited freedom.

Part Two: The Clay and the Wheel

The communal art center occupied what had once been a financial district skyscraper. Now its hundred floors housed workshops for everything from molecular gastronomy to quantum sculpture. Mira made her way to the ceramics studio on the thirty-seventh floor, nodding to familiar faces as she passed.

“Mira! I was hoping you’d come today.” The voice belonged to Thomas, a man in his seventies whose biological age had been halted at around fifty. Medical technology had conquered aging decades ago, though some chose to experience it as a form of temporal art, deliberately allowing themselves to age naturally.

“I wouldn’t miss it,” she replied, approaching Thomas’s workstation where he was centering a large mass of clay on his wheel. “What are you creating today?”

“I’m attempting a Song Dynasty vase design,” Thomas said, his hands moving with practiced precision. “I’ve been studying under Master Zhou in the Historical Artisan Program. The techniques are maddening—so different from what I learned in New Delhi last year.”

This was the essence of their society—the voluntary pursuit of mastery across disciplines, cultures, and time periods. Thomas had spent forty years as a quantum physicist before developing a passion for ceramics. Now he traveled the world studying under master potters, both contemporary and historical through AI-reconstructed teaching programs.

Mira settled at her own wheel, selecting a ball of clay from the communal supply. As she began to center it, she felt that familiar resistance—the push and pull between her will and the material’s nature. This dynamic tension was what drew her to pottery. In a world where most resistance had been engineered away, the clay offered honest feedback. It couldn’t be rushed or deceived. Mastery came only through patience, practice, and respect for the medium’s properties.

“I see you’re still working with stoneware,” observed Eliza, a young woman who had recently joined their pottery circle. Though chronologically only nineteen, her eyes carried the depth of someone who had lived many virtual lifetimes through historical immersions.

“I am,” Mira replied. “I find its temperament suits me. How’s your exploration of raku going?”

“Challenging,” Eliza laughed. “I tried a firing yesterday that was… humbling. The pieces cracked in ways I didn’t anticipate.”

“That’s what we’re here for,” Thomas said without looking up from his work. “If everything came easily, where would be the growth?”

This philosophy underpinned their society. Without external pressures of survival, people had discovered that meaningful satisfaction came from self-imposed challenges—the voluntary embrace of resistance as a path to growth.

As Mira worked, allowing her hands to shape the clay into a graceful bowl form, she thought about the strange journey humanity had taken. Their ancestors had spent millennia struggling against hunger, disease, war, and scarcity. Now, those ancient adversaries vanquished, people had discovered a subtler hunger—the need for purpose, for the satisfaction that comes from overcoming meaningful obstacles.

“Mira, would you mind if I observed your pulling technique?” asked a newcomer, a boy who appeared to be about thirteen. “I’m Kai. I just started learning last week.”

“Of course,” Mira smiled, slowing her movements to demonstrate how she thinned the walls of her bowl by carefully applying pressure with her fingers. “The key is finding the right balance—too much pressure and you’ll collapse the form, too little and it remains thick and heavy.”

As she guided Kai through his first attempts, Mira reflected on the world they inhabited—a world where teaching and learning had become central human activities, where the relentless urgency of survival had been replaced by the patient pursuit of mastery.

Part Three: The Archivist’s Tale

After cleaning her hands and placing her bowl on the drying shelf, Mira made her way to the Nexus, a sprawling complex at the city’s heart where public gathering spaces intersected with gardens and learning centers. She found her mentor, Archivist Solomon, waiting at their usual spot beneath a massive oak tree that had been growing for over two centuries.

Solomon’s dark skin contrasted with his silver-white hair, which he had allowed to grow long and wild. Though he could have chosen any appearance, he embraced the visual markers of his actual 112 years—a rarity in a society where physical age was largely optional.

“Mira, my dear,” he stood to embrace her. “How was your morning with the clay?”

“Grounding,” she replied with a smile at her own pun. “But I’m eager to hear about your latest research.”

Solomon was one of the world’s foremost Historical Experience Architects, responsible for creating immersive educational environments that allowed people to understand past eras with unprecedented fidelity. Unlike entertainment-focused historical simulations, Solomon’s recreations prioritized emotional and social authenticity—the textured reality of lives lived under vastly different conditions.

“I’ve been reconstructing early 21st century experiences,” he said as they settled with their meals—Mira’s a Mediterranean salad, Solomon’s a recreation of a West African dish his grandmother had prepared. “Specifically, the psychological landscape of the Transformation Crisis.”

Mira nodded. The Transformation Crisis was well-documented—that chaotic period between 2025 and 2075 when automation, artificial intelligence, and molecular manufacturing had simultaneously eliminated most traditional jobs while creating abundant resources. The social upheaval had been profound as humanity struggled to redefine purpose in a post-scarcity world.

“What have you discovered?” she asked.

“The psychological pain was even more acute than our records suggest,” Solomon said, his eyes distant with the weight of the experiences he’d reconstructed. “People who had defined themselves through productive labor for generations suddenly found themselves adrift. The suicide rates, the addiction epidemic, the civil unrest—they all stemmed from the same existential crisis.”

“The question of purpose,” Mira murmured.

“Precisely. What do humans do when survival is no longer at stake? Our ancestors struggled terribly with this question.” Solomon took a bite of his food, savoring the flavors that connected him to his family’s past. “Some retreated into purely hedonistic virtual worlds. Others tried to maintain artificial scarcity through status competitions. The breakthrough came when enough people rediscovered an ancient truth.”

“Which was?”

“That meaning comes not from necessity but from voluntary engagement with worthy challenges.” Solomon gestured to the world around them. “From choosing to develop skills not because we must, but because mastery itself brings joy. From creating communities not for protection, but for the inherent value of human connection.”

They ate in contemplative silence for a moment, watching people move through the Nexus—artists discussing collaborative projects, philosophers engaged in friendly debate, children learning traditional dance forms from an elderly instructor.

“I’m starting medieval calligraphy this afternoon,” Mira said finally. “I’ve been fascinated by illuminated manuscripts since visiting your Monastic Life experience.”

Solomon’s face brightened. “An excellent choice! The patient discipline of calligraphy shaped much of how those monks understood their spirituality. The deliberate attention, the precision, the acceptance of imperfection—all of it became a form of meditation and prayer.”

“That’s what I’m hoping to explore,” Mira admitted. “Not just the skill itself, but the mindset behind it.”

“This is why I’ve always believed in you, Mira,” Solomon said with evident pride. “You understand that these ancient arts aren’t just techniques to be mastered but doorways into different ways of being human. Different ways of finding meaning.”

As they finished their meal, Solomon’s expression grew more serious. “I’m planning a special Historical Immersion for next month—a deep exploration of the Community Reformation Movement that emerged during the later Transformation Crisis. Would you be interested in participating? I think your perspective would be valuable.”

Mira knew this was no small invitation. Solomon’s Historical Immersions were renowned for their emotional intensity and transformative potential. Participants didn’t merely observe past events but experienced them with full sensory and emotional fidelity.

“I would be honored,” she said. “What aspect will we be focusing on?”

“The spiritual dimensions,” Solomon replied. “How people rediscovered purpose through Christ-centered community when traditional structures collapsed. How they learned to see abundance not as an end but as a means to express love and foster growth.”

Mira nodded thoughtfully. The Christian Renaissance, as historians called it, had been a pivotal movement during the Transformation—a rediscovery of relationship-centered spirituality that helped shape the more compassionate society that followed.

“I look forward to it,” she said. “Though I should warn you, my calligraphy will likely still be quite amateur by then.”

Solomon laughed. “All the better! You’ll experience the humility those novices felt when they first took up the quill.”

Part Four: The Ancient Letters

The Scriptorum occupied a quiet corner of the Historical Arts Center. Unlike the pottery studio’s communal atmosphere, this space encouraged contemplative solitude with individual writing desks spaced comfortably apart, each angled to receive natural light from high windows.

Master Emilia, a woman who had devoted fifty years to the study and practice of historical writing forms, greeted Mira at the entrance. Her movements were deliberate and graceful, as though her decades of calligraphic practice had shaped her very being.

“Welcome to your first lesson,” she said, leading Mira to a simple wooden desk where materials had been prepared: parchment, quills, various inks, and a small book of exemplars. “We’ll begin with understanding your materials. In medieval times, these weren’t just tools but precious resources, often created through the labor of many hands.”

For the next hour, Emilia guided Mira through the basics—how to properly hold the quill, how to achieve the correct angle for different strokes, how to manage the flow of ink. The process was frustratingly difficult. Where the clay had been forgiving in many ways, the calligraphy demanded precision Mira’s hands hadn’t yet developed.

“I’m making a mess of it,” Mira sighed, looking at her uneven letters that bore little resemblance to the elegant exemplars.

“You’re beginning,” Emilia corrected gently. “There’s a difference. The medieval novices spent years mastering these skills. Their patience came partly from necessity—their world moved more slowly than ours—but also from a different relationship with time and purpose.”

“What do you mean?” Mira asked, dipping her quill carefully as she’d been shown.

“They understood that the difficulty was the point,” Emilia said. “The struggle to create something beautiful was itself an act of devotion. The medieval monks who created illuminated manuscripts weren’t just recording text—they were engaging in a form of prayer through their labor.”

Mira considered this as she attempted another line of text, a simple prayer from a 13th-century manuscript: Lux aeterna luceat eis, Domine—May eternal light shine upon them, Lord.

“Even in our world of abundance,” Emilia continued, “where we choose these disciplines freely rather than by necessity, the principle remains. The resistance we encounter in mastering difficult skills shapes us. The medieval worldview understood this intuitively—that humans need worthy challenges to become fully themselves.”

As the afternoon progressed, Mira began to experience what Emilia described. Despite the frustration, she found herself entering a meditative state through the repetitive, focused attention the calligraphy required. Each letter demanded her complete presence—no wandering thoughts, no divided attention. In this way, the difficult discipline became a doorway to a different kind of awareness.

“I believe I’m beginning to understand,” Mira said as their session drew to a close. “It’s not just about creating beautiful letters, is it?”

Emilia smiled. “The beauty is important—our ancestors understood that aesthetics matter to the human spirit. But you’re right. The medieval scribes would say you were beginning to understand ora et labora—prayer and work as unified spiritual practice. In our world of abundance, we’ve rediscovered this wisdom in a new context.”

Mira carefully cleaned her quill and arranged her practice sheets, feeling a satisfaction that went beyond the modest progress she’d made with the actual lettering. “I’ll practice daily before our next session.”

“I look forward to seeing your development,” Emilia said. “Remember, the goal isn’t perfection but faithful presence to the process.”

As Mira left the Scriptorium, those words resonated with her. Faithful presence to the process. In a world where any product could be instantly fabricated, process had become the precious element—the irreplaceable experience of growth through challenge.

Part Five: The Evening Circle

Evening found Mira at the home of her friend Gabriel, who hosted a weekly gathering of people from across New Arcadia. Gabriel’s home, built into the living branches of an enormous genetically-modified banyan tree, reflected his passion for bio-architecture—the integration of living systems with human habitation.

Tonight, about fifteen people had gathered in his central living space, a circular room where the tree’s natural formations created alcoves and seating areas. Some were close friends, others new acquaintances, all connected by the ancient human desire for meaningful community.

“Mira!” Gabriel called warmly as she entered. His dark curls were pulled back, revealing the intricate neural-interface nodes along his temples—markers of his work as a Dream Architect, creating shared consciousness experiences for therapeutic and educational purposes. “Come, share what you’ve been exploring lately. Simon was just telling us about his apprenticeship with the ocean nomads.”

The gathering represented the diversity of paths people chose in their world of unlimited options. Simon, a former quantum physicist like Thomas, had recently joined a community that lived on self-sufficient floating islands, developing deep relationships with marine ecosystems. Leila, seated nearby, devoted herself to reconstructing lost languages. Johannes explored the boundaries between music and mathematics, creating compositions based on prime number sequences.

As the evening progressed, their conversation flowed from individual pursuits to deeper questions. This was the true purpose of Gabriel’s gatherings—not mere social connection but collaborative meaning-making.

“I’ve been reflecting on something Solomon said today,” Mira offered during a natural pause. “About how our ancestors struggled during the Transformation because they had defined themselves through necessary labor for so long.”

“The Purpose Crisis,” nodded Leila. “My grandmother lived through it. She said people felt useless when machines could do everything better.”

“They were measuring themselves by the wrong standard,” said an older man named Marcus, who had remained quiet until now. Once a renowned physician before medical nanites revolutionized healthcare, he had reinvented himself as a master gardener. “Production efficiency was never the true measure of human worth.”

“Exactly,” Mira agreed. “But it took our species generations to internalize that. To understand that meaning comes not from necessity but from chosen challenges. From relationships. From creating beauty.”

Gabriel smiled, the neural nodes at his temples glowing faintly as his emotion activated them. “This is why I believe we’re living in humanity’s golden age, despite what the Virtual Retreatists claim. For the first time, we’re free to discover what it truly means to be human without the distortions of survival pressure.”

“Yet we need some form of resistance,” Johannes observed. “Complete frictionless existence leads to existential despair. We’ve seen that in the Pleasure Immersion communities.”

The group nodded solemnly. The Pleasure Immersives—those who chose to live in perpetual states of artificially induced bliss—were widely viewed with compassion but also concern. Studies showed alarming rates of psychological disintegration among those who avoided all forms of challenge or discomfort for extended periods.

“Balance is key,” offered Sophia, an elder who specialized in wisdom traditions. “Our ancestors were crushed under excessive burdens. We risk dissolving in absolute freedom. The middle path is voluntary challenge undertaken for worthy purposes.”

“And community,” added Gabriel. “Not the forced communities of mutual survival, but chosen fellowship for growth and love.”

As the evening continued, they shared a meal together—each person having prepared something reflecting their heritage or recent explorations. Mira had brought simple bread she’d baked herself, though she could have easily generated any culinary masterpiece through automation.

The conversation eventually turned to spirituality—a dimension that had evolved rather than diminished in their post-scarcity world. Without material pressures, many had found more time and space for contemplating existence’s deeper questions.

“The Christian communities during the Transformation got something profoundly right,” Marcus observed. “When everything was in flux, they returned to the essence—loving God, loving neighbor, finding meaning in relationship rather than acquisition or achievement.”

“That’s the focus of Solomon’s next Historical Immersion,” Mira mentioned. “The Christian Renaissance during the later Transformation years.”

“I participated in his reconstruction of the New Monastics movement,” Gabriel said. “It was profound—experiencing how they created intentional communities focused on simplicity and service even as abundance technology was spreading.”

“The paradox,” Sophia nodded, “is that they embraced voluntary limitations in a world of expanding options. They understood that boundaries create meaning, that infinity without focus becomes void.”

As the evening drew to a close, the group gathered in a circle for their traditional closing ritual—each person sharing one moment of beauty they had experienced that day. It was a practice borrowed from ancient spiritual disciplines, adapted for their context.

“The resistance of clay beneath my fingers,” Mira offered when her turn came. “And the humbling difficulty of forming medieval letters.”

“The sunlight through leaves as I tended the western garden,” Marcus shared.

“My student’s face when she finally understood quaternion rotations,” said Leila.

One by one they contributed, creating a mosaic of human experience—the small, precious moments of connection, challenge, and beauty that gave shape to their freely chosen lives.

Part Six: The Dream and the Awakening

That night, Mira opted for a natural sleep rather than a programmed dream state. She could have selected any experience—from fantastical adventures to guided learning—but sometimes she preferred to let her unconscious mind process the day in its own mysterious way.

Her dream, when it came, carried her back through time. She stood in a simple room where a young monk bent over a writing desk, carefully forming letters on parchment by candlelight. His face showed both concentration and peace—the integration of challenge and meaning that Emilia had described.

The scene shifted, and she witnessed a mother in a 21st century home, overwhelmed by work demands, financial pressure, and childcare. The woman’s face reflected a different kind of struggle—not the chosen discipline of the monk but the crushing weight of necessity without margin.

Then came scenes from the Transformation—factories emptying as automation took over, universal basic resource systems being implemented, protests and celebrations, confusion and possibility.

Finally, she saw herself from above, working at the pottery wheel, then at the calligraphy desk, then in Gabriel’s circle—moving through her freely chosen day of meaningful engagement.

She woke with the dawn, the dream still vivid, carrying a renewed appreciation for the delicate balance their society had achieved after generations of trial and error. The human need for meaning had not changed, but the context for finding it had transformed completely.

Stretching, Mira considered her coming day. She would return to the pottery studio this morning, then meet with a group exploring ancient musical traditions in the afternoon. Tomorrow she would join a temporary community restoring a wilderness area—not because nature needed human intervention anymore, but because the work connected them to the earth and to each other.

As she prepared for the day, Mira reflected on the strange journey humanity had taken. Their ancestors had spent millennia struggling against external necessities—fighting for survival, for resources, for advantage. Now, those ancient pressures removed, people had discovered that the most meaningful challenges came not from external scarcity but from internal aspiration—the desire to grow, to connect, to create beauty, to embody wisdom.

The necessity of survival had been replaced by the hunger for meaning. And in that transformation, humanity had finally found the freedom to explore what it truly meant to be human.

Outside her window, New Arcadia was awakening—not to another day of desperate production or consumption, but to chosen pursuits, to voluntary challenges, to communities gathered not from need but from love. People moved with purpose toward their freely selected disciplines, carrying forward the ancient human quest for meaning in an entirely new context.

Mira smiled as she stepped out into the morning light. In a world where anything was possible, the most precious possibility remained the same as always—becoming more fully human through chosen challenge, created beauty, and compassionate connection.

In abundance, they had rediscovered the essential truth their ancestors had glimpsed through the fog of necessity: that humans were made not merely to survive but to create, to grow, to love, and to transcend.

And in that understanding, they had finally found their way home.


Thomas: The above was written by an AI. The email exchange that generated this future vision was the following prompt and email exchange with a friend.

Prompt: Please write a science fiction story where survival is no longer an issue, and people must find meaning in the world by developing various mental, emotional, and physical skills. A world where people grow up without needs that must be met but choose to satisfy an inner hunger that is more subtle. A world where they engage in relationships that are positive, Godly, Christ-like, and treat each other well. This world has no war, hunger, poverty, disease, or lack. This world allows everyone to pursue their particular, unique, individual taste for satisfaction through various forms of intellectual, physical, and emotional role-playing, virtual experiences through books, and interactive VR. Meaning is felt/experienced by overcoming the barriers to developing the various types of skills a person is exposed to and by the joy of exercising that skill. Any skill, whether mundane, artistic, strong, or agile on the mental, emotional, or physical level, can be chosen and found to be satisfying by its mastery.

The following email exchange was the stimulus for this idea for the problem of feeling satisfaction in a future world: (read from bottom to top of the exchange)


John, I think you have a balanced perspective on including new technology in our lives. We are extremely adaptable regarding our expectations and sense of living an adequately fulfilling life based upon the options of action and skills required to function.

This raises the issue of what we do when robots and AIs can do all our thinking and doing for us. I don’t think such a reality is unthinkable now, by just extrapolating current technology a little—or maybe a lot—but into the imaginable future. I can see a world where the movie “Wally” is possible, where people sit, eat, and participate in virtual entertainment without the necessity of doing anything.

We may someday live in a world where every person has the realistic option of choosing to die of overnutrition and stasis. But such worlds will also have the option of learning the old skills, the martial arts that no one uses or needs, the manual dexterity of handwriting, painting, carving… the intellectual challenges of learning Morse code, calculus, relativity, and history… and mastering the emotional landscape of relationships, loss, and comparison… by exposure to virtual circumstances (e.g., acted out in reality with people or VR role-playing). There won’t be any necessity to do anything, so life will be mainly about pursuing rudimentary to advanced levels of various physical, mental, and emotional skills. No skills will be required to survive or cope with the environment. But what will remain is the inherent body-mind-heart pleasure associated with overcoming various forms of resistance associated with modifying our physicality, which includes satisfying our abstract hunger for intellectual, emotional, and spiritual fulfillment. Meaning is perceived/experienced by overcoming various forms of resistance. A taste for each form of satisfaction is developed by being exposed to, being challenged by, and learning and developing basic to advanced skills in each area. Life/physicality/idea-emotional space provides many axes of potential satisfaction in the vast possibilities available to pursue various forms of mastery. From our current perspective, people think largely about being forced to develop various skills required by today’s technology and the experience of the satisfaction of its mastery. People in each era cannot imagine not having that form of expression required to produce its associated satisfaction. However, satisfaction can be felt by overcoming the resistance associated with developing any skill. We will soon live in a world where no skills will be driven by survival. Rather, we will live in a world where we can choose any skill and experience the feeling-reward associated with its mastery. Our life trajectory will be customized by our choices of desired expression rather than the survival requirements imposed by eating, mating, and shelter. This transformation will require a huge change in the expected trajectory of life and what it will contain, but it is possible to find meaning in a world where survival is no longer challenged.

Thomas


Great comments, Mike. But can’t you see the same comments being made during the transition from horses to cars? “I hope they keep their horseman skills alive after they no longer ride or use horses to pull a carriage.” And “These young guys don’t even have an interest in learning how to hitch up a team of horses to a carriage, which we always considered a basic, age old, rudimentary skill that everyone had to know!” It seems to me that in every age, as technology makes old skills obsolete, the old skills fade into obscurity. I think there is also an element of “old fashioned-ness” at first! Who wants to learn a skill that just became obsolete? One would appear old fashioned if they even showed an interest! Maybe a few generations later the skill could be revived and considered cool, but not when it first loses all favor.

At the same time, we develop skills that we don’t even realize that we have! My parents, for example, bought their first desktop computer in their very late years, and they couldn’t even visualize how moving a mouse on a flat horizontal pad related to moving an arrow on a vertical screen! When my mother’s last husband clicked a mouse, he also moved the mouse so far from its target that it selected something other than what he intended. He had to look at the mouse instead of the screen! These are skills that old folks could not develop!! But everyone younger did with ease, without even thinking about it!!

I don’t know. Just guessing. But it seems to be a recurring pattern of new skills and obsolete old ones.

I always enjoyed a manual transmission, and most of my cars had it, including my first car. But Jeannette couldn’t drive one, and neither could Walter when he got old enough to drive! I finally gave it up when the clutch pressing seemed to be throwing my back out and I needed more frequent chiropractic adjustments. But now, with all my gym workouts, I could probably return to having a manual transmission if I wanted it.

I just heard that some EV manufacturers are adding a fake manual transmission to electric cars!! What an absurd concept!!

John


Hi John,

It is obvious that your old next-door neighbor has a leftist bias toward Musk (likely specifically for his recent backing of Trump) and, by extension, Tesla.

I do, however, have an affinity for driving a car myself and being able to operate a standard transmission (although I haven’t needed to for years) and double clutch it if necessary.

As forward as I’d like to be, I still revere old skills like carving a wooden rocking horse for my daughter with a chain saw and 4-wheel drifting around dirt mountain roads, plus forward slipping a tailwheel airplane in a severe crosswind into a short mountain airstrip to nail the landing.

If “Minority Report” (the movie) is all we have to look forward to I’ll be supremely disappointed.

When I can no longer (as an old and less capable man) be able to drive myself safely, I will welcome robotaxis and other AI aids. Young, able people should not see that as a panacea for failing to acquire skills or experience life.

I have read that so many Gen Zers have never even learned how to drive. Of course, not many “Boomers” can do rudimentary things, either, and over time many of us have forgotten what we once knew.

Mike

Hi Mike,

I happened to reconnect with my old next-door neighbor of 20 years in Santa Rosa when he emailed me about an email from me that he suspected was phony. It turned out that the email he asked me about was indeed a fake. But we ended up exchanging a few emails about life, and after I mentioned that I bought a Cybertruck with self-driving, this is the reply I got back from him. And keep in mind, this fellow is 9 years younger than I am….

“Well, as in the past, we’ll have to agree to disagree. I sold all my Tesla shares and will not contribute further to Mr. Musk’s already obscene wealth. Clearly, by his actions, he’s disturbed. Even if I approved of the man, I don’t think I’d feel comfortable driving a vehicle so reliant on software, given my past relationship with software over the past 40 years. And, when it comes down to it, that truck is so ugly, I can’t bear to look at them, much less live with one. I don’t like the idea of a self-driving vehicle, either. I’m not being a luddite, I’d rather drive the car myself. I still enjoy shifting gears — but, as long as you’re happy with it, it’s none of my business.”

Mike, that made my day! I completely forgot the mentality of a lot of people I dealt with there.

John

 

Renaissance Ministries – Political Advocacy

Renaissance Ministries and Politics
by Thomas Lee Abshier, ND
3/29/2025

Renaissance Ministries (RM.com) is a 508(c)(1)(a) non-profit organization that is allowed to engage in political speech and candidate advocacy without jeopardizing its tax-deductible donation status.

The scope of Renaissance Ministries’ areas of intervention is broad, as the intent is to affect the entire soul and heart of the nation and, ultimately, the world. As addressed on this site, the first and foundational layer of intent and purpose of RM.com is personal sanctification (living holy lives pleasing to God, accepting Jesus as Lord and Savior), boldly sharing the gospel story, and telling your story of transformation and inviting two others (family, friends, coworkers, acquaintances) to join you in living holy lives, and supporting each other for the rest of your lives in pleasing God.

Personal transformation and evangelization/sharing/proselytizing are the foundations of national and world transformation. But God also wants and expects us to sanctify our organizations, whether family, professional, community/non-governmental, or governmental. God has created the world as a hierarchical system, with leaders and followers, sheep and shepherds responsible for 10s, 100s, 1000s, and millions. God intended government to be the institution of leadership and enforcement of His Law (Romans 13).

Part of the transformation I experienced as a result of my altered state vision and revelation was the need for sanctified leadership to bring our nation and, ultimately, the world under voluntary submission to the will of God in personal and group righteousness. I first ran for president of the United States in 1988 on the platform of an accountable government. I ran for the US Senate in Oregon in 2004 on an Energy, Righteousness, and Accountablity platform. And I ran for president of the United States in 2024 on the platform of public and private moral rectitude and personal holiness to make America Godly again. I am preparing for my third run for United States president in 2028. My website can be found at www.drthomasforpresident.com.

I support all candidates who overtly acknowledge God of Moses, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as our creator; Jesus Christ as our personal Lord and Savior, creator and ruler of the universe; and the Bible as His revelation of His will and nature. I have listed a fairly complete defense of the righteousness of including the God of the Bible as the God of our nation. I have addressed the complex issues of “Separation of Church and State,” which has been deeply misquoted from the Constitution/Bill of Rights as only a prohibition of Congress establishing a religion by law. In all manners of government, policy, and speech, we should openly acknowledge the God of the Bible, the Lordship of Jesus Christ of our nation, and individual worship.

I believe it is possible to win the 2028 Presidential Election if every person who is changed/transformed by the message of the Bible or RM.com commits to sharing and transforming the lives of two friends/family/coworkers/acquaintances within a month. Then, the followers of Christ will grow to 84 million in 26 months. If those followers believe my message and program are good for America, the evangelical effort of sharing the gospel can be paired with a larger action step supporting my candidacy. I am committed to political leadership and to using the democratic processes of our republican government to lead/push/advocate for Godly legislation, Constitutional and Biblical judicial rulings, and an administration of the law in the spirit of holiness in governing our land.

The action steps required to turn this idea into reality are to change your heart and join an RM.com support group in your area or online to maintain and strengthen your faith.  Share your faith to win your family and friends to accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. Become politically informed and active. Join “The Coalition,” the group committed to bringing Godly government into city, county, state, and national office. Enroll all new converts and seasoned/mature Christians to participate in the Coalition. Stay informed. Participate in discussing policy, current events, problems, and Godly solutions.

The goal is to create a permanent political voting block that continues to advocate for Godliness in government. I will be 74 in 2025 and want the Coalition applying its pressure for Godliness in government to outlive me for centuries. If another leader arises who is more articulate and adept at administrating law within the boundaries of righteous law, I will gladly pass the charge of bringing Godly government to our nation to him/her. In the meantime, participate in the forums and support me with ideas and debates over policy and political/economic/moral philosophy issues. We will debate policy and attempt to agree on the best way to implement Godly government in policies/legislation, judicial opinions, and administrative action. Until another leader arises who can take the mantle, I am willing to focus this movement toward implementing a “Righteous Society.” by the force of will, vision, and leadership.

Renaissance Ministries: Faith in Action Through Political Engagement

Renaissance Ministries represents a unique approach to faith-based advocacy, combining spiritual renewal with active political engagement. As a 508(c)(1)(a) non-profit organization, we are distinctively positioned to participate in political discourse and candidate advocacy while maintaining our tax-deductible status.

Our political engagement flows naturally from our foundational mission of personal and societal transformation. We recognize that while individual spiritual renewal is essential, God’s vision for humanity encompasses all aspects of society, including governmental institutions. This holistic approach acknowledges that governmental leadership plays a crucial role in implementing and maintaining Godly principles in society.

Our political advocacy rests on several key principles:

  1. Biblical Foundation
  • Recognition of the God of Moses, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob
  • Acknowledgment of Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior
  • Application of Biblical principles to governance
  1. Grassroots Transformation
  • Personal sanctification as the foundation
  • Community-based support groups
  • Relationship-based evangelism
  • Network multiplication through personal connections
  1. Systematic Change
  • Engagement at all levels of government (local to national)
  • Support for candidates who openly acknowledge Biblical principles
  • Development of policy positions based on Biblical wisdom
  • Creation of lasting political influence through “The Coalition”
  1. Long-Term Vision
  • Building a permanent voting bloc committed to Godly governance
  • Developing future leadership
  • Creating sustainable political momentum
  • Establishing enduring institutional change

Renaissance Ministries’ political advocacy represents a strategic approach to implementing Biblical principles in governance while respecting constitutional frameworks. We seek to create lasting change through democratic processes, combining spiritual renewal with practical political action.

Through this integrated approach, we work toward a society where faith and governance work in harmony to create a more righteous and just nation. Our political advocacy is not merely about winning elections, but about transforming the heart of our nation through both spiritual renewal and political engagement.

Death and the Grave

Death and the Grave: Understanding the Pale Horseman of Revelation
by Thomas Lee Abshier, ND
5/18/2025

Introduction

When the Lamb breaks the fourth seal in Revelation’s apocalyptic vision, a ghastly pale horse emerges carrying a rider named Death, with Hades following close behind. This final member of the Four Horsemen completes a terrifying quartet of divine judgments set to affect a quarter of the earth’s population. As Richard T. Ritenbaugh suggests in his analysis, this pale horseman represents pestilence—disease epidemics that sweep through human populations with devastating efficiency, especially in the aftermath of war and famine brought by the preceding horsemen.

This essay examines the biblical symbolism of the fourth horseman, explores the relationship between death and the grave, and considers the theological implications of pestilence as divine judgment. Through careful examination of biblical texts, historical patterns, and contemporary realities, we gain insight into how disease functions as both a natural consequence of human behavior and as an instrument of divine warning.

The Ghastly Pale Horse and Its Rider

A Color of Death

The fourth horse’s color is described with the Greek word chloros, which gives us English terms like “chlorine” and “chlorophyll.” While technically referring to a greenish-yellow hue seen in nature’s new growth, Ritenbaugh notes that ancient Greek writers applied this term more broadly—to fearful men’s pallid faces, the pale gold of honey, or the gray of olive bark. Most significantly, Thucydides used it to describe the skin color of plague victims.

This contextual understanding suggests that John saw not merely a pale horse but one with the sickly, greenish-gray pallor of a corpse. Modern translations capture this nuance with phrases like “sickly pale,” “deathly pale,” or “pale green like a corpse.” The horse’s very appearance, then, heralds its deadly mission—it bears the color of death itself.

Death as Pestilence

While the rider bears the straightforward name “Death” (thanatos in Greek), Ritenbaugh makes a compelling case that this term carries a more specific meaning in context: pestilence or disease. He points to the Septuagint (the Greek translation of the Old Testament), where translators frequently rendered the Hebrew word deber (pestilence) as thanatos. Examples include Moses warning Pharaoh about potential pestilence (Exodus 5:3) and God’s pronouncement of the fifth plague (Exodus 9:3).

Most definitively, Jesus Himself describes the sequence of end-time events using the term loimos (pestilence) in the same position where Revelation places the fourth horseman: “And there will be famines, pestilences, and earthquakes in various places” (Matthew 24:7). This parallel confirms that the pale horse and its rider represent not merely death in general but specifically death by disease—epidemics that historically follow in the wake of war and famine.

Death and the Grave: Inseparable Companions

Understanding Hades

The text states that “Hades followed with him,” introducing a concept that requires careful biblical examination. While popular imagination often pictures Hades as a netherworld of departed spirits based on Greek mythology, Ritenbaugh argues that Scripture uses this term simply to denote the grave—the physical place where bodies rest after death.

The New Testament term “Hades” corresponds to the Hebrew “Sheol,” both referring to the state of being dead and the place of the dead. Ritenbaugh cuts through speculative interpretations to emphasize that biblically, Hades represents not some shadowy realm of conscious spirits but the grave itself—a place where, as Solomon writes, “the dead know nothing” (Ecclesiastes 9:5).

Biblical Evidence of Their Connection

Scripture consistently presents death and the grave as parallel or synonymous concepts:

  • “For in death there is no remembrance of You; in the grave who will give You thanks?” (Psalm 6:5)
  • “Like sheep they are laid in the grave; death shall feed on them…” (Psalm 49:14)
  • “What man can live and not see death? Can he deliver his life from the power of the grave?” (Psalm 89:48)
  • “I will ransom them from the power of the grave; I will redeem them from death” (Hosea 13:14)

These passages reveal a simple truth: where death goes, the grave inevitably follows. Though one might distinguish between death (the cessation of life) and the grave (the repository of remains), Scripture treats them as essentially inseparable aspects of the same condition—being cut off from the living and from God.

Resurrection as the Answer

Hope emerges from this connection, as Scripture repeatedly affirms that God will redeem His people from both death and the grave through resurrection:

  • “But God will redeem my soul from the power of the grave” (Psalm 49:15)
  • “I have opened your graves, O My people, and brought you up from your graves” (Ezekiel 37:13)
  • “All who are in the graves will hear His voice and come forth” (John 5:28-29)

This biblical perspective reframes our understanding of the fourth horseman and his follower. Their appearance in Revelation represents not just mortality but the comprehensive cessation of physical life that only resurrection can overcome.

The Modern Reality of Disease

Contemporary Causes of Death

Ritenbaugh’s examination of leading causes of death in the United States (circa 2001) reveals a striking pattern: disease vastly outpaces violence as humanity’s primary killer. Of the top ten causes of death—including heart disease, cancer, stroke, and respiratory diseases—94.66% resulted from illness rather than injury or violence.

More revealing still is the nature of these modern plagues. Unlike the infectious epidemics that historically followed war and famine (plague, dysentery, tuberculosis), today’s leading killers are largely “diseases of affluence” stemming from lifestyle choices: heart disease linked to poor diet and sedentary habits; cancers associated with smoking, alcohol, and environmental factors; diabetes connected to obesity and nutrition.

Self-Inflicted Judgments

This pattern suggests a profound truth: even in peaceful, prosperous societies with advanced medical technology, humanity remains vulnerable to pestilence—often through self-inflicted health crises. The fourth horseman’s work continues not primarily through dramatic plagues but through the slow, cumulative effects of poor stewardship of physical health.

As Ritenbaugh observes, these diseases are “in many respects self-inflicted, caused by years of abuse through overeating or poor nutrition, smoking, drinking, or dealing with known carcinogens.” This perspective aligns with biblical principles linking behavior with consequences—the same pattern underlying the progression of the Four Horsemen.

Medical Limitations

Despite unprecedented advances in medical science—”at no time in man’s history has it come farther”—humanity remains unable to solve “the mystery of disease and death.” This limitation reflects the fundamental reality expressed in Romans 6:23: “The wages of sin is death.” Medical technology may extend life and alleviate suffering, but it cannot overcome mortality itself.

This sobering reality reminds us of our dependence on God not merely for physical healing but for the ultimate solution to death. As advanced as our treatments become, we cannot escape the fourth horseman’s reach through human ingenuity alone.

Wild Beasts: The Ecological Consequence

The Surprising Addition

Revelation 6:8 concludes with a seemingly unexpected addition to the horsemen’s powers: “to kill with sword, with hunger, with death, and by the beasts of the earth.” Ritenbaugh convincingly argues that this represents a summary of all four horsemen’s activities rather than attributes of the fourth rider alone.

The inclusion of “beasts of the earth” might initially seem puzzling, but Ritenbaugh demonstrates its logical place in the progression of catastrophes. When war, famine, and disease depopulate regions, the natural balance between human civilization and wildlife shifts. Predatory animals multiply and expand their territories, increasing the likelihood of deadly encounters with humans.

Biblical Precedents

Scripture provides several examples of this ecological principle:

  • Nimrod’s rise to power after the Flood began with his hunting skills, suggesting predators threatened the small post-diluvian population (Genesis 10:8-9)
  • God promised Israel a gradual conquest of Canaan partly to prevent wildlife overpopulation: “I will not drive [the Canaanites] out from before you in one year, lest the land become desolate and the beasts of the field become too numerous for you” (Exodus 23:29)
  • Lions killed Samaritans after Assyria depopulated northern Israel through captivity (2 Kings 17:25)
  • Wild beasts appear in biblical curses for disobedience: “I will also send wild beasts among you, which shall rob you of your children, destroy your livestock, and make you few in number” (Leviticus 26:22)

These examples illustrate how war, famine, and disease create conditions where animal attacks become a genuine threat—completing the cycle of judgment represented by the Four Horsemen.

The Theological Significance of Pestilence

The Progression of Judgment

The Four Horsemen follow a logical progression that reveals the principle of cause and effect in human affairs. False ideas (first horseman) lead to war (second horseman), which disrupts agriculture and causes famine (third horseman), which in turn weakens populations and enables disease (fourth horseman). This sequence demonstrates that catastrophes are not random but follow predictable patterns—patterns that often begin with spiritual deception and moral failure.

As Ritenbaugh observes, “God is showing us that these sorrows trace their roots back to disobedience and rejection of Him.” The progression of horsemen illustrates Jesus’ teaching that a civilization built on sand cannot withstand the storms that inevitably come (Matthew 7:24-27).

Divine Warning and Human Responsibility

Scripture consistently presents disease as both a natural consequence of human behavior and a divine warning. The blessings and curses delineated in Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28 explicitly connect obedience with health and disobedience with disease. This pattern appears throughout biblical history, with pestilence serving as both judgment and call to repentance.

The pale horseman thus serves a dual purpose in God’s economy: executing justice for sin while simultaneously warning humanity to return to Him. Like the other horsemen, pestilence reminds us that “God is still on His throne, judging mankind for his sins.”

The Beginning of Sorrows

Jesus described the calamities represented by the Four Horsemen as “the beginning of sorrows” (Matthew 24:8), indicating that these judgments—though severe—represent only preliminary warnings before the final climactic events of human history. In this sense, even the ghastly pale horseman serves as an act of mercy, offering humanity an opportunity to recognize the consequences of sin and turn to God before facing more severe judgment.

Ritenbaugh quotes Hebrews 12:25, 28-29 to emphasize this warning aspect: “See that you do not refuse Him who speaks… For our God is a consuming fire.” The fourth horseman’s pestilential ride across human history represents not merely punishment but a sobering call to reverence and godly fear.

Conclusion: Beyond the Pale Horse

The pale horse and its grim rider remind us of humanity’s mortality and vulnerability despite our technological advances and medical breakthroughs. Disease remains a powerful equalizer that affects individuals across all social strata, economic levels, and geographic regions. Yet this biblical image offers more than a morbid reminder of death’s inevitability.

By understanding the fourth horseman as representing pestilence—a judgment that follows logically from war and famine—we gain insight into both divine justice and providential warning. The progression of the Four Horsemen reveals that actions have consequences, whether on personal, national, or global scales. False ideas lead to violence, which disrupts food production, which compromises health, which creates conditions for further suffering. This cycle demonstrates that spiritual realities have physical manifestations.

More hopefully, Scripture’s teaching about death and the grave points toward the ultimate answer to the fourth horseman. While pestilence claims bodies for the grave, God promises resurrection and redemption for those who turn to Him. As Hosea prophesied and Paul later quoted, “O Death, I will be your plagues! O Grave, I will be your destruction!” (Hosea 13:14; 1 Corinthians 15:55).

The rider named Death may wield terrifying power, but his authority extends only as far as God permits—”over a fourth of the earth.” Even at his most devastating, the pale horseman remains subject to divine limitations and ultimately serves God’s redemptive purposes. For those who heed the warning he represents, even this most fearsome of the Four Horsemen becomes not a harbinger of despair but a somber invitation to seek the God who alone conquers death and the grave.