Godliness as the Prerequisite for Limited Government

Limited Federal Government
by: Thomas Lee Abshier, ND
8/12/2008

I write this piece from the perspective of a Christian, a patriot, and an advocate of Limited Government. Its intended audience is all people of all political and theological persuasions but is primarily written for the conservative and believer to give apologetic support for Limited Government and America’s return to its foundation as a Christian Nation.

I believe America’s foundation and her Constitutional Republican form of government were ordained and inspired by God. I believe the Constitutional Republic, with its 3 separate branches, and its capitalism-based economy, contains the necessary elements to manifest an operationally perfect system of government. But, the economic-governmental system by itself is lifeless and will not mechanically bring forth the optimum experience of societal function. Rather, the Capitalistic Republic must be given life, spirit, and direction by an entire nation of men, representatives, and citizens, who are unambiguously committed to manifesting the will of God on Earth. The impersonal forces and machinery of government and the market can be bent to any purpose, and neither liberalism, republicanism, nor a libertarian government formed only by the requirements of a free market has sufficient internal boundaries or incentives to guide men into a state of fulfillment in their public and private lives.

Our nation, governed by the limits of the Constitution, can only reach its potential of maximal similarity to Heaven when the citizens continuously struggle to manifest Godliness in their private and public lives. I believe America’s first immigrants, and the framers of our founding documents, intended to establish a Christian nation, and that America is falling from greatness because of our rejection of the Judeo-Christian ethic and commitments. The responsibility for restoring our land lies squarely on the backs of believers. It is not the pagans, atheists, and humanists who must first become holy, righteous and repent so that our nation may prosper, rather it is we as Christians who must lead. When Christendom truly lives the holy and righteous life implied by the name “Christ-in”, the brightness and righteousness of our lives will shine, and enroll the world to imitate that goodness and share in the rewards such a life offers.

2 Chronicles 7:14 “if My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.

Human nature is primarily driven by self-interest, which includes a lust for power, a desire to maintain its own existence and lifestyle at the expense of others, and a drive to control its environment by coercion, criticism, and force. A society populated with people who have not dedicated themselves to balancing these human traits with Godliness will manifest elements of these passions in their institutions of government and industry. The unsanctified human drive in the institutional, corporate, and governmental group-expression results in various forms of societal abuse. The compassionate Liberals now campaign on the promise to raise taxes to transfer wealth to the entitlement class. The holier than thou Liberals impose unGodly moral standards in the name of gender and sexual orientation equality and tolerance. The freedom loving Liberals legislate infanticide in the name of choice. The progressive Liberal declares Secular Humanism as the de facto state religion in the name of separation of church and state. The one world globalist Liberal opens our borders to illegal immigration, trade without restriction, and trilingual instruction pamphlets in the name of multiculturalism.

The stimulus to write this piece came from an email that raised the issue of imminent excessive government surveillance and regulation of personal decisions. A Godly government needs information to help facilitate the coordination of its various limited duties. But, surveillance as a tool for governmental quality control and management can be redirected to intimidate, coerce, and enable enforcement of laws that benefit the ego and unGodly social engineering of government more than it benefits the social order. Unless Godliness directs the individual and group spirits of a society, the government will pursue its own best interests at the expense of the populace. History is replete with examples of societies overtaken by tyrants. On some level, all people who have succumbed to tyranny have suffered from a deficiency in discernment and response to budding evil embedded within the social/political environment. Even the best government will be forced to engage in ever more draconian surveillance, legislation, and enforcement to fulfill its charter of maintaining the social order when the people abandon Godly self-regulation.

The philosophers from both sides of the political divide have offered solutions for social issues. The Liberal solution is, in general, an increase in government control, more spending on social programs, less religion, less government intrusion, and more enforcement in the areas of freedom of choice, tolerance, and equality. The Libertarian solution is little or no government and regulations while allowing the forces of the market to regulate human behavior. The Conservative seeks to reduce taxes, balance the budget, minimize government, and return God to public life. The following essay is largely an analysis of the Libertarian perspective of a society without government. The examination concludes that a central nervous system is required to control the movement of the body. Likewise, we need to fully represent the metaphor of the body in the society, by the organ of government, with its executive branch, courts, laws, and bureaucratic administration of those laws. But, having noted the necessity of government, we then emphasize that most of the duties of our current “New Deal-Great Society” government can be transferred to the private sector if the society is well organized and interconnected with the purpose of cooperation, and the people adhere to Godliness.

The essential hope of a Market-based government (Libertarian) is that the society will self regulate because the force of self-interest will be so strong and detailed that the regulation by law will be made obsolete. Such a system is value-free in the sense of not regulating anyone by any set of governmentally chosen set of supernaturally attributed morals. The essential hope of the Government based economy (Liberal) is that the wisdom of man will provide direction that will be higher than the pandering to base desires produced by the market and its appeal to man’s base appetites. The Limited Government (Conservative) seeks to take the best from both, and produce a synthesis of Godly Law that establishes the basic ground rules within which economy can function in its robust effort-rewarding manner that gives men the incentive to work and produce for profit and consumption.
The non-Christian population of the United States may see the common adoption of a Christian form of Godliness as the establishment of a theocracy or a Church-State religion. But, it is only returning America to its foundation, which has always tolerated other faiths, but it maintained the Judeo-Christian moral standard as the foundation for law and common civil relationship. Religion in a Christian nation would be self-imposed. But, without a majority who choose to vote, legislate, and manage the private sector on Christian principles, the social standard will revert away from the Godliness that produces the stable and lovely group ethic that allows Limited Government.

Prayer and Bible reading should not be mandatory, nor should church attendance, but if these good practices are not broadly maintained in the culture, the seeds of destruction will be sown in society. Limited Government allows people to choose their philosophical-religious beliefs, but social behavior that crosses the line of violation of others must be restricted. A judiciary comprised of men holding Godly standards is the only group that should try, convict, and punish on behalf of the state. But, the enforcement of most forms of antisocial behavior involving self, family, work, should be handled within the social unit close at hand. Likewise, the excellent behaviors such as prayer and Bible reading in school should be allowed and encouraged, as parents should be able to extend the teaching of their children to the large segments of imprinting time occupied by the classroom. Educational choice should be universal, as this makes the educational establishment accountable to the demands of a Godly marketplace. When people are enfranchised to vote with their feet and their money, the market responds to give them what they want. But again, the market is not the solution; it is only one tool of the society that must be sanctified.
I use the word “Godliness” extensively in this essay. The reader should understand that the intended meaning and implication of this word is love of self, neighbor, and God, as the Laws of God are summarized in this principle and spirit. Godliness refers to the entire spectrum of good and right manners, rules of relationship, ethics, and morals established by God as Right. Forgiveness of offense releases the soul to live in love and authorizes God to deliver justice. Love repays evil with good, but this does not mean accepting violation without response and letting evil prosper without resistance. Love informs the violator of his injury to person or property, and restraint is delivered in the form of boundaries, reduction in degrees of freedom and instruction. Love speaks the Truth but does so in love. To allow the evil to perpetuate unopposed enrolls the victim as a party to the violation. Confronting and establishing boundaries expresses love and creates a strong relationship with the violator. Confront the violation with humility, and have faith that the message will eventually be received. Always be open to the possibility of an error in my own judgment of right and wrong. Know that God loves each person, regardless of his or her political persuasion, economic standing, educational background, moral compass, or religious belief. But, there is a way of life that brings men into relationship with the Father God, and many ways that separate us from His fellowship. Following the path and pull of selfish human passions, un-moderated by love, separates us. It is our duty to be God’s light in showing that we actually care for the prosperity of every man’s soul and body.

—————————–

The following essay was initiated and stimulated when John, a Libertarian, sent me the following email dramatizing how much personal data could soon be collected and made available to government, corporations, law enforcement, federal and state agencies and bureaucracies.

From: John
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 3:38 PM
Subject: FW: Ordering pizza in 2010

Ordering pizza in 2010. This is funny, but scary because it’s probably not too far from becoming reality.
John


Dear John, I enjoyed the future-reality shock humor. The point of the piece was no doubt to illustrate that big government wants to control us in every aspect of our lives, and you are undoubtedly right about the propensity of Big Government to expand and control. But, in the vein of our previous discussions about adopting a Libertarian style economy-only society, I believe it would be necessary to implement even more data collection than was illustrated in the 2010 Pizza piece if we do not have a governmental system.

T.


Not sure about that, Tom. A completely private society could offer any services a government can offer, but services would be offered competitively, not monopolistically, and costs would be distributed more efficiently to those who benefit. You use a road and you pay for it. No collectivist taxes on everybody regardless of whether they use a resource or not. Etc.

There are private models of justice adjudication, private roads, private currency, etc. This pizza thing is a vision of a corporate society propped up by government protection from competition. In a private property society, one would agree to only the level of surveillance one chooses.

With government, you have monopoly power, and legislation, and if one does not participate in the national database one is a criminal and hauled off to jail. Government is about giving super-human rights to ordinary humans. I contend that nobody has the right to take my money by force regardless of whether he has a mask over his head or a shiny badge and a gun. We cannot hire others to steal, and yet voting is precisely a sanitized and respectable form of that. There must be something inherently immoral about giving certain human beings the right to steal with immunity or to initiate force against others.

Please don’t take my word for it! There are people smarter than I who have thought through all these issues and written books.
Cheers, John


John, according to the “Let go and Let the Market” article by Gladish that you recently sent me, one way of implementing a Market-Only system that replaces government would be to use RFID monitoring of the entire populace. Gladish uses the data collection capabilities associated with modern technology at the center of his theory. To implement a cashless society, where credit is given based on service to the society and credit is withdrawn from the individual’s account due to moral violations, requires a great deal of information about the person so that the society/market can make these kinds of judgments. The Gladish article illuminates the fact that any system that seeks to eliminate government will introduce other institutions or methods to serve the same function, and other remedies must then be applied to fix the unexpected and often unpleasant side effects. Upon examining this subject, I have come to realize that Limited Government can only exist for a righteous and Godly people. When the people, their representatives, and commitment of government is to Godliness, it is possible for Government to shrink to its minimal necessary size.
I understand and agree with your point about the intrusiveness of government, and the possibility of delegating and reallocating the functions of government to private enterprise. To summarize, you believe that it is not necessary to have a system of top-down government-imposed laws, (or at most, that government should be very limited), and that private citizens or corporations can organize to perform many of the functions of government such as police and justice, allocation of resources, punishment of moral infractions by economic sanctions of various sorts, and in short do all the functions of society without governmental direction. I agree that such a system is possible. But, my comment about the need for a strong information collection and surveillance system being necessary to implement an “economy-only government” was given credence by the concept introduced in the Gladish article.
From that essay, I was alerted to the likelihood that a vast databank about each person’s life-transactions was possibly necessary in order to give proper feedback to enforce economic sanctions against those who do things that some people might consider wrong (such as murder and theft). Gladish proposes that it is possible to implement market sanctions against people who have engaged in trespassing of various sorts simply by making their behavior available known to the market. This appeal to the market for an impersonal, non-law/government imposed response, was meant to show the plausibility of creating a society without any appeal to, or definition of, moral standards.

(Note: the lack of any religion/mysticism based moral system seems to be a primary point in the Gladish theory. He really wanted to develop a society that could implement a perfect market-based regulation of the society without the acknowledgment of God in any way. He was really arguing against the need for government, and the laws and moral codes they imply. He was using the elimination of government as a surrogate opponent to show that God and His standards were unnecessary. He sought to create a system where the humanistic understanding of “best practices” could be reflected in the economy and executed to show that an entire society could be regulated without an appeal or reference to Godly morality. Proverbs 14:12 “There is a way that seems right to a man, But its end is the way of death.” The Founders intended that our government reflect Godliness in its structure and laws, just as God Himself intends that righteous government reflects His righteous will and way.)

But in order to give concreteness to his theory, and to implement this Godless system of economic feedback he noted that information would be needed to give indicators of each person’s credit-worthiness. Thus he introduced the solution of RFID or Biometrics tracking of each person’s productivity and violations of property and person. With this information included in the personal database, the raw data would be available for the market to judge a person’s creditworthiness. The combination of collecting detailed data about the person’s life, and the absolute power to grant the credit that sustains life and lifestyle, makes it possible to apply economic consequences upon them. Such force in a cashless, credit-only, society provides a near-irresistible force on the violator. If the data collection were extreme enough, the economic pressure on the individual would create a nation of sheep. The force and judgment of the economic system would be so precise that the economic feedback would shape everyone to fit the algorithmic judgment of the system.

And yes, society can agree to any level of surveillance of its citizens, just as it can organize its own police force, currency, independent territory, defense, research, and education system, etc.

(Note: any time a regulatory function is exercised by a subset population over the larger whole (e.g. police, judiciary, housing association executive committee, etc.), that subset is operating as a de facto government. These mini-governments are simply of a smaller size, and offer the possibility of more local control and participation than the macro-federal and state governments; i.e. entities that exercise the onerous duties of taxation and foolish appropriation of those resources. And, if this is the goal, to reduce the size of government and make it more personal and wise, then the privately employed system can do that. But, even the private system can grow and become impersonal, rude, and foolish. If the goal of privatization is to eliminate governmental, parental, rule-making bodies entirely, this is not logically possible. If the private system executes or enforces any rule-making or regulatory function, it has power over the participants and is a type of government.)

If we are to use only the forces and tools of the market to regulate the interpersonal behavior of the citizens, then the amount of finesse, dexterity, nimbleness, and agility of the economic system to do all these functions, without government, will require a huge amount of data collection. And this is the point where the potential slide into tyranny enters the market-only solution. The database must be available to all people so that they can each individually evaluate the creditworthiness of a person before rendering them goods or services. Otherwise, if each person does not judge every other person’s creditworthiness, the database of service credit, consumption and violation debits must be computed by the impersonal judgment of the credit-debit algorithm. The entry of the credit-debit algorithm into consideration illuminates the potential for abuse and tyranny since the algorithm will necessarily reflect someone’s judgment of Truth and Right behavior, or “best practices”.

Gladish clearly wishes to implement a society without the embedded morality of law imposed upon society. He wants to show that it is possible to create a society which does not even refer to a moral system at all and thereby shows the irrelevance of God. He desires to prove that by appealing only to the sense of best practices within humanity that society can function in a good, peaceful, and well-regulated way. And his alternate system is to show that the market-alone can make judgments of people’s creditworthiness and that this tool will give social feedback that alters behavior and shapes it toward that excellent pattern that we all desire of our fellow man. Gladish is proposing a society-wide cybernetic feedback system to shape behavior using economic incentives and disincentives. He proposes using RFID implants or biometrics to track the movements and transactions of all people at all times doing all things seems. With this raw data, he then applies an algorithmic analysis and gives people the reward of credit for good behavior such as work, volunteer service, kindness, voting, etc. And, for consumption of resources, carbon footprint, rude behavior, and criminal conduct, credit is subtracted from his account. I must admit the system is brilliant. It will produce an incredible society. This will work! Government will absolutely be unnecessary using such a system. It appeals to the most powerful tools available to shape human behavior, reward/aversion training, Operant conditioning, the Pavlovian signal, and the cybernetic loop. With society hooked up to such a loop, it will not be necessary to use force or government to control the society. Thus my comment, that the 2010 pizza story sounded very similar to the society of an economy-only government.

Gladish’s economy only system transfers the central nervous system function of the traditional government to impersonal enforcement by an economic algorithm that judges our creditworthiness. Instead of government using laws, the courts and police as enforcers of moral standards, our behavior is “shaped” according to the judgment of the best practices of the group mind of that society.

A nation without any data collection system, and no government, would be regulated much like the economies of the pre-industrial and information age. The economies in these times were subject to frequent boom and bust cycles, which appear to have been smoothed out somewhat.

(Note: This smoothness lasts as long as we follow the rules of good monetary and fiscal policy both publicly and privately. I refer in particular to the laws that Congress passed which forbade lending institutions to discriminate against people who could not qualify for a loan for lack of sufficient collateral, thus precipitating the current housing crisis.)

My point is that without any (or only a small amount of) data collection about the internal workings of the economic system, the potential for huge disparities between production and demand, or monopolistic entities arising that take over the economic landscape are real possibilities.

Likewise, it is possible for the tipping point of loans and credit to extend past the place where a person could realistically produce the value associated with that credit. Without calculations, without data, without monitoring of transactions and comparing creditworthiness against the proposed purchase, the aggregate societal economic balance sheet could easily become unbalanced. When the supply and demand do not match, the system can go unstable and produce shortages, recessions, and even depression. But, even these problems may be eventually solved by various limits, and systems put in place to reduce the risk and consequences even without intrusive data gathering.

I do not wish to impugn the economy-only government solely on the issue of the need for excessive surveillance, although I think it is an important consideration for those who wish to advocate for this solution to the problem of intrusive, corrupt, and ever-expanding government.

Rather, the more important criticism that I wish to confront about the economy-only government is its basis upon self-interest. This criticism may be shocking since its advocates tout the superiority and advantages of the market-based government because of its dependence upon this strong natural human emotion. Structuring a system that caters to the self-interest of every man yields a most productive society. Each individual naturally purses his own best self-interest by whatever means he deems most effective. If society values production and does not give him food, shelter, and entertainment if he does not produce value, then he will receive strong feedback that production is required.

In such a system, every man is equal and is forced by the natural demands of fairness to produce value so that he can receive value from others. And as sovereign controller of his credit expenditure, he can choose to transfer that credit to farmers in exchange for food, or he can give that credit to charities, agencies, research, education, or any other entity of his choice.

Every person desires freedom from forceful domination. We desire a society that regulates the passions of men and honors our inalienable rights. We desire protection from the bullying of other private citizens, the monopolistic practices and tendencies of corporations, and from government corrupted by the influences of power, fame, and wealth. The economy-only system has been presented as such a system. But, we should be cautious in placing our full trust in a system that is free from an acknowledgment of every citizen’s responsibility to embrace Godly self-regulation.
I see polar expressions of the world in all circumstances.
In the axis of government, the extreme poles are tyranny and anarchy. Note that tyranny and anarchy are only an infinitesimal part. The economy-only government is a type of anarchy. No man is superior to another in this system, and each made advocates for his best interest economically and morally by judging the creditworthiness of his trading partners in the society. But, for each person to judge the creditworthiness of his partner accurately, he needs a strong database to fully know his partner, so as to properly extend him credit. But, to do this he needs a data collection system which gives him that information. As a result, every person in that society, wishing to execute the same totally-independent judgment of their trading partners, agree to institute a data collection system and algorithmic computation of creditworthiness. The result is total independence from each other, but total reliance on the computation of the algorithm. The result is the tyranny of the algorithm. By this example and analysis, the point of connection of the opposite poles is illustrated, as is the unification of tyranny and anarchy.

Moving a small distance away from the extremes on both ends, and toward each other, the left wing polarity would be the strong central government with a socialistic control of the economy, strong bureaucracies, and many laws. The right-wing polarity would be a small government, private ownership of production, an information-rich society about self, others, and groups that enables social decision-making, plus an algorithmic recommendation for voting and consumption.

Moving closer to the center, we see a government like our current Constitutional Republic with its strong bureaucratic control of all phases of economic life. And, on the other side of that polarity, we see an economic system with less data collection, without algorithmic enforcement, and the use of cash instead of the cybernetic tracking and feedback system.

At the center we find a blend of the two polarities – the government and economy mixed together to form “Limited Government”. In this expression, we see the vast mix of credit and cash, economic indicators and social trends guiding production, corporate and professional self-regulation, transparent accountability of the public officials, common defense, and a people committed to moral self-regulation. But, such an ideal blend of the government and economy in the context of a Limited Government will only occur when the people have a deeply rooted, and personally lived commitment to God and His Way.

In the extreme expression of any system, the power is more concentrated and hence there is the possibility of exerting undue influence for personal benefit or to manifest a personally held belief about a greater good (such as we see in the jihadist philosophy). Human nature is strongly tempted to take advantage of available power.

In the case of the world governed by self-interest only, the system is likely to allow the cultivation and growth of an extremely virulent strain of self-interested individuals. These people make an art form of evading the modest barriers erected within polite society. This is the predator species; the trusting people who simply do their job, think about others and expect truthfulness are the societal prey.
The more a society promotes the pursuit of self-interest (without a sense of moral/Godly regulation to temper the desires of the self), the greater the probability that it will evolve a subpopulation of predators. Such a system is closely akin to the law of the jungle system, and while efficient and free, it is brutal. Charity, kindness, and heart must be incorporated into a “self-interest” based system so it produces more than an abundance of products at low prices.
I believe that for the self-interest based world to actually produce the joie de vivre that people really desire, it must incorporate the personality and properties of Godliness into the individual and societal values. This point is the major theme of my essay and is the only force in which I place my faith in the possibility of man creating a successful and stable Limited Government.
One possible transition scenario from our current state of Traditional Government to Limited Government, is for the entirety of the nation, individuals and groups, to suddenly embrace Godliness. Such a scenario is obviously unlikely but is considered to note that any system of government could be sanctified if all the people in the society and government spoke, acted, and thought in terms of legislating, adjudicating, and governing under the influence of Godliness.

Limited Government could evolve from any governmental system. Limited government at its “sweet spot” nourishes private ownership, rewards the risk of investment, labor, and invention; it collects extensive but non-intrusive data about production, consumption, and opinions; it provides easy ongoing interim, official non-binding voting on issues to give feedback to professionals, corporations, government agencies, judiciary, legislators, and executives; it has a media that reports the facts as objectively as possible, provides a place for the expression of opinion, and allows a forum for discussion about the issues, and is committed to presenting the news through the lens of Godliness. Ideally, Limited Government optimizes the establishment of limits and the satisfaction of desires and does it through mechanisms that are largely generated by the community debate and arise as a social consensus.

In the society that expresses itself according to the moral bias of Godliness, and under the social organization of Limited Government, the behavior of each man is properly respectful of the property and interests of his neighbors. And, various other intangible “best practices” of mankind optimize interactions on many subtle levels. To coordinate public activities, the Limited Government will require some level of data collection. Likewise, the majority of citizens must participate in some level of active community and professional involvement such as staying informed and voting about issues within the profession, union, or corporation. And, unless volunteers handle the duties of management and decision-making, the group would need to assess (private tax) its members to support administrators that serve in each cluster.
Without a set of standards for performance, behavior, and goals, and actual data regarding these parameters, it will be impossible for a private society, or government to intervene to improve performance. Intrusive monitoring of personal behavior is not necessary when the principles of Godliness are widely inculcated into the group, and every person supports and confronts his family members, friends, business associates, customers, and leaders with the principles of moral self-regulation. Likewise, the social monitoring machinery established for purposes of safety and defense can be trusted when the governing agencies are dedicated to the principles of Godliness.

Next, we examine another transition scenario starting with the Strong Central Government, and follow its gradual evolution into the optimum Limited Government. The first step in this transformation is the installation, election, or miraculous conversion of the heads of state and their cabinet. The leadership enforces Godliness from the highest level, and with this commitment to Godliness, the parental government exerts an influence on the citizens and institutions at each successively subservient level in the society.

Any system of Government can be endured and reasonably well enjoyed as long as the leaders of business and industry, the bureaucrats, professionals, labor, and homemakers bow to the rules of Godliness in conducting their professional and personal lives. Any system of government can transform into the optimum mix of government and private enterprise to form a Limited Government if the entire populace is likewise transformed. There will always be a problem with the stability of the system though, since the heart of man has such great affinity for pleasing self, over the Godly regulation of desire to love God’s way and to love neighbor as self, that after the horrors of one historical vignette has past, they forget, and seek to increase their pleasure over the amount allowed by the moderated consumption of pleasure available to the Godly. People are greedy, they want more, and they take more than is fair, more than they deserve for the amount that they have earned. God has created evil to tempt us, to continually challenge us to choose Him over the pleasures of the flesh at the expense of someone else. Thus, the only way to maintain the ideal society where limited government thrives in perpetuity is for the people to continue to warn their children of the dangers of the spirits that lie inside. The children must be taught the principles of goodness, and the evil they express in their temptations and transgression in lying, cheating, stealing, and fornicating must be confronted and used as object lessons to awaken the soul to the dragon that lies within. The parent that does not reign in the child and teach him the ways of the Lord and embed the spirit of self-regulation in his heart is a violator and puts the entire society at risk. Only one strong charismatic deluder needs to enter the world stage for a nation of unprepared sheep to be led into slavery. Therefore, parents need to teach their children the patterns of truth and lies in the public arena, and impress upon each one the personal responsibility that he has to confront evil in his fellow man. Assuming that “it isn’t my fight,” and “what right do I have to confront another person in their sin,” is the method by which the wolves grow strong and eventually terrorize and control the herd.

If the people are forced to be good and Godly by men with guns and shiny badges, the society will prosper. The good people will love the enforcement of righteousness, the evil will hate it, and those without a Godly moral compass will not be able to tell the difference. When the general population adopts the spirit of Godliness as an internal commitment, the authority of the State can be gradually transferred to a Godly strong private sector to self-regulate. Such is the natural progression toward the appropriate level of freedom.

People have the “right” to do Right, but they have no right to do Wrong. It makes no difference whether government or hired security corporations enforce right behavior. The argument is over who is more likely to enforce righteousness, and who is more likely to use the power of force to perpetrate and use their authorized power to steal and enslave. The Libertarian argues that government is inherently susceptible to the seduction of power because of the lack of personal consequence and investment.
This argument and consideration are true, and for this reason, we must populate the ranks of our civil servants with Godly men. We must ensure that the charters of each bureau and agency have the service of God written into their charters. We must require that the leadership of agencies, be men committed to Godliness in character, discrimination, and courage. Such men should be able to examine law, policy, and intent and confront error in their construction and execution. The manager in government and industry often only sees his position as oversight, rather than as judge and advocate for righteousness. Such a frame cannot be allowed in a Godly society. Every day, every person must take on the job of advocating for righteousness in his sphere, and do so without fear of livelihood and status.

The person serving in the governmental machine clearly faces temptations. He faces the challenge of falling into bureaucratic malaise where anything is acceptable that is dictated by law or his superiors. The standards of right and wrong become blurred and questionable as he sees arguments for both sides of the issue. The numbing effects of peer pressure, management, repetition, and moral complexity cause him to lose courage and conviction to confront the wrong he once saw clearly. He conforms to questionable policies and enforces them out of fear of loss of position or promotion if the commands of the hierarchy are questioned, challenged, resisted, or exposed. Still, all these temptations can be overcome by a commitment to Godliness.
We have clearly identified the fact that government has difficulty solving the problems of wealth allocation, poverty, job security, health care, drug addiction, and unemployment. But simply turning these problems over to the private sector will present its own set of challenges. Ultimately, the same requirements for Godliness that we considered above in the governmental hierarchy are active in the private sector. The major difference between the two realms, public and private is that the private sector is subject to the feedback loop of wealth creation. If no wealth or value is created, and if there is no demand for the product created, then the private enterprise fails.

But, the private institutions are subject to their own fatal flaws. The requirement to produce quarterly profits causes companies to shortchange R&D expenditures. The drive of wealth and greed causes the captains of industry to seek to consume their competition and raise prices as they establish monopolistic control. The drive to produce more faster, cheaper, and better pushes managers to push workers to higher levels of stress, with longer hours, and lower wages.

Thus, for the society to truly be a pleasant and joyous place to live, the private institutions should require their employees to behave in the ways of Godliness. The citizen should realize that supporting the cheapest foreign brand may place workers, the environment, or prosperity at home in peril. Simply instituting private enterprise in lieu of government will not immediately solve all the problems of society. But, the dog eats dog competition of free enterprise will provide pressure to produce results. Thus, these various social problems will probably get better under the automatic disciplinary hand of free enterprise. But, until Godliness is instituted as part of the corporate culture the workplace will still be a painful experience.
When the individual, corporation, and government embrace Godliness, the system will assume relative stability and righteousness. It was the intention of the Founders in their framing of the Constitutional Republic to establish a system of Limited Government based on the broad embed of personal self-government.

In our modern wired world, we can each begin the process of pushing to establish Godliness in our sphere of influence. The chances of Godliness taking hold and pushing back the sea of hedonism and Godless self-indulgence is slim. But, there is no point in just sitting back and capitulating. More than likely we will have to suffer some very great disaster, where people realize that we are not adequate to hold against the powers of darkness without the help of a miracle working God. At that time, we should be ready with our testimony and our plan of action.

Much discussion is held bantering the term “Limited Government” among the conservative circles. But, the meaning of this term is so ambiguous that we could easily argue that the best government is no government. But, reason, history, human nature, the Bible, the Constitution, and the metaphors of nature argue for an ecologically complex system that incorporates government and private enterprise in a single system. The complexity of moderation associated with competing and mutually interdependent systems creates ecological complexity and system robustness.
Personal self-government according to the Biblical principles of Godliness was the intention of the Founders in their establishment of a Constitutional Republic. If we take the Constitution and its implicit standard of Godliness as our national charter, we will begin to transfer the various functions of government to private enterprise.

When Godliness is the primary rule in a man’s life, only a minimal level of government is needed to coordinate, enforce, and focus the individual and group activity. Regardless of the path to Limited Government, Godliness is the central key to allowing societal stability, security, and satisfaction.

From this point on, I shall dispense with the discussion of the “Economy-Only Government” and shall instead focus on the optimization of the “Limited Government”. The perfect mix of government and private enterprise will not be advocated or explicitly elaborated, other than to recommend that a limited Federal and State government as advocated by the Founders. I believe the Constitutional template was divinely inspired, and I believe it will function well as the initial template for the implementation of a consciously chosen system of Limited Government in a complex ecology of private enterprise and a family of nations.

There are many possible mixes of government and private sector functions that society may choose. A large body of people will necessarily require the performance of many types of functions. Thus, people will specialize according to the needs of the time, and talents of the individual. These disparate activities of individual and groups comprising the economy-society must be coordinated and centralized at various levels, whether by a governmental or private institution.

Each society must decide how much personal data and monitoring is needed to regulate personal behavior, ethics, environment, and educational standards, etc. Laws, policies, agreements, or contracts will be made to guide industry and private behavior and to thus institutionalize the wisdom of experience. Likewise, the contingencies for change must be built into the system to adapt to internal and external pressures such as new technology, environmental concerns, resource scarcity, and international relations.

Note: In this essay, we have not stated how Godliness will arise, or even how to make it arise. Obviously, this is a critical consideration because the foundational consideration in establishing the Limited Government is a Godly society. Nevertheless, in its implemented state, Godliness will be a form of non-denominational Judeo-Christian ethics that will permeate society. There will be no creed or standard of orthodoxy that anyone must believe, but the general standard will be the hologram of Biblical Truth. This will leave the specifics of what Truth is, and how it is to be implemented, open to debate in every situation, personally, publicly and in government. No act of Congress will establish a religion, people are free to believe or not believe anything. Still, the Constitution is to be recognized as being based upon the general principles of Christianity and governing a Godly people. Law will be established with its foundation based upon the moral principles of the Bible, and a body of cases with precedent, argument, and justification. There will be a spirit of reverence and respect for God as creator and author of life that is held by all respectable members of society. Parents, educational establishments, courts, businesses, and bureaucracies will all speak, teach, and legislate overtly in terms of Christian ethics. There will be no law passed requiring a particular denominational worship, and no law passed declaring a particular doctrine as orthodox. But, there will be an open consideration and acknowledgment and debate at all levels of government, business, and family about the righteousness of any rule, policy, or fee as it relates to the Judeo Christian concept of Godliness.

But, we currently live in a society without an overt commitment to Godliness. We once were much more committed to life governed by this principle and spirit, but, in our current era, we have a socially liberal contingent that actively campaigns against any acknowledgment of Godliness in government. Our money still says, “In God we Trust” and our pledge still says, “One nation under God”, but these are straggling remnants that are crumbling as the generations and traditions are being replaced by Humanism, selfishness, greed, personal satisfaction, and desire.
The fundamental commandment of the Bible is summed up in the following verses:

Matthew 22:37 Jesus said to him, ” ‘You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.’38 “This is the first and great commandment.39 “And the second is like it: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’40 “On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.”

The above principle is the foundation of all social systems whether government or economy-based. Regardless of whether a nation is governed by law or by equity in trade, the nation and its people must have a respect for the Law of God and have the Spirit of God in their hearts. Godliness is expressed as acting on the spiritual insight that reveals how life really is to be lived in perfection as seen by God. Godliness is perceived as a vision, feeling, and/or sense of knowing of the way of God. Every person has the rudimentary leading of God in his heart, but it becomes much more refined and accessible when a person engages in daily Bible reading, accepts Jesus as his Lord, and immerses himself in the Holy Spirit. Thus, the personal vision of Godliness is available to every man who puts his heart, soul, mind, and strength into seeking to know the Truth.

For the sake of completeness, we must ask the age-old question, “What is Truth?” And, the simple answer is, “Truth is what God sees as objective reality.” Every moment has an actual content of physical position, a content of momentum, radiating forces, impending external forces, and intent. The momentum will provide a large force directing us toward our next moment’s position. Likewise, external forces (spiritual or mechanical), seen or unseen at the moment will influence us in the ensuing moments and may overpower and thus redirect our momentum. As spiritual and physical beings, we have a place in the universe as an active actor, and our presence, momentum, and intent will inherently influence the world around us. And finally, our intent can introduce a force into our own trajectory and alter it. God has a plan, a perfect template for our movement, and it is up to the individual to seek and find His way, and in that way is the optimized life.

Embedded in the very essence of life is the fact that laws govern the very structure and substance of the universe. These universal laws of nature extend outward from the conscious particulate understructure of nature, and they emanate outward from the structure and nature of our soul. Thus, the universal laws of nature penetrate into our volitional world and require us to function in various ways to avoid pain, experience pleasures, and maintain survival. As a result of the boundaries of movement that were built into the physical universe, we can only follow certain paths. As a result of the boundaries of pain built into the soul and the psychic universe, we are repelled from engaging in activities that threaten life and well being.

Regardless of our awareness of God and His Law, we are all subject to it. Consciously acknowledged or ignorant of the allowed pathways of the universe, they must be obeyed as a fact of life; no man operates outside of God’s laws, we just fail to optimize our experience by choosing a lesser subset of life rules. Attempting to escape and rebel only initiates forces that move to restore the errant soul toward the path of life.

We may feel that we are captains of our fate, and free to choose our moral standard. And, to an extent this is true. We can direct our lives toward a goal, and we may to a greater or lesser extent reach that goal, but ultimately, if forces larger than our will and physical power direct our lives and influence our minds, we will be blown by that wind. Disease, famine, war, pestilence, quakes, weather and death all demonstrate the existence of a force larger than our own. But these forces are not random or mindless; they all work together to manifest God’s purpose. The formative source-power is awesome, mysterious. Two paths can always be chosen, rebellion against God and hopelessness, or Hope and Faith that all things are working to move us toward the centerline of Righteousness and Truth. The framing of life as positive or negative, hopeful or hopeless, hating God as evil or loving God as good, seeing life as random or seeing life as God’s play, is our fundamental power of controlling destiny.

John, your premonition dream years ago of the cars piling up behind you on the freeway; and then shortly later in real life having a shopping cart actually appear in front of you, swerving, and seeing the cars pile up behind you, was a graphic illustration of the lawful, mechanical progression of life. It likewise demonstrated our ability to intervene to a degree in the sequence of life’s progression. We live in a Lawful universe, and we are subject to laws that in turn affect our sense of satisfaction and sorrow. Our free will is still operative even amidst this great mechanical progression, and our free will choices determine to a great extent our happiness and contentment with our state of life. Thus, the advantage to following the patterns of the larger Lawful universe; we will benefit by patterning our own lives along the paths of the God-given regulations and rules. We should follow the rules, not as a mindless true believer, but rather as a man filled with the Spirit, feeling, knowing, and riding the waves of direction by the Spirit. Such is where the mystery and adventure of life are experienced at their maximum. We are called to combat the forces of dissipation, disobedience and rebellion and enroll our fellow man in the way of Truth. We are to seek to manifest righteousness in the larger world by enrolling willing men to labor in the service of the Spirit of God in manifesting his plan of Goodness for mankind.

Thus, “self-interest” is just as important as “other-interest”, but both are subservient to the superior Laws of God, nature, and Life. No real wisdom is possible until we see the perspective of God. Until then we simply speak from example, experience, cited authority, or theory. Thus, self-interest is only one of the factors which must guide life. To hold self-interest too highly, places one of the gifts of God, one of his implanted desires, above God in our hierarchy of respect. When doing so we worship a false god, which produces its own failures. The only best, most satisfying paths of life are God’s paths; all else are suboptimal dreams and passions of man that seem good but produce less fruit than the bounty possible when following God’s leading and way.

We wish to progress from our current government as a Constitutional, Corporate Representative, semi-socialistic, Big Brother Nanny State, Globalist, Industrial-Government Alliance, to the optimum balance of market and government which we shall call “Limited Government”. The following sequence may produce this evolution.

1) Revival: This is a revival of the Spirit of God moving with power across the nation, moving people to conviction, repentance, and holiness. Either a renewal of the majority of the nation or all its leaders must overtake the nation. This could come by an act of war, natural calamity, Jesus returning as King with Power, the Spirit of God moving on the hearts of men such as in the First Great Awakening before the Revolutionary War, the Second Great Awakening before the Civil War, or by convincing proof that God was real by science or broad personal experience.

When the nation returns to God in a true, Spirit-led way, where every man knows that God is real and that His way is True, then the entire framework and spirit of the nation will change. Until then, the battle will rage between government, industry, nations, races, and the people. Currently, the battle for Godliness is being lost. The putative experts of our Secular Humanist nation, the physicists, biologists, and psychologists have used their interpretations of quantum mechanical uncertainty, relativity, evolution, and psychology to deny the Truth of God’s existence and give archeological, mythological, and theoretical credence to their claims of humanistic divinity; and the people have followed these false prophets like sheep.

The Humanistic path has won the hearts of man due to the combination of expert opinions of doubters in the specialized and esoteric fields of physics and biology; the desire of man to be free of external regulation so as to elevate the himself to the level of a god subject to no one; the lack of concrete daily experience of God and the associated plausible possibility of His non-existence; and God’s allowance of immediate pleasure associated with following the flesh.

As a result of God’s non-existence in the minds of men, the passions of the soul are elevated to the point that their satisfaction is the goal of life, rather than being the gifts of God whose proper satisfaction give life its texture and fullness. Every thinking man knows that the pleasures of the flesh are fleeting; that fame, gold, women, and power flare brightly, fade quickly, and leave us depleted. The long slow burn of moderation in all things gives us the daily long term satisfaction of a life well lived. The life lived with such balance in all things is its own reward; that path is the experience of Heaven on Earth, and the character one develops living in such a way maximizes our pleasure and reward in the life to come.

Godliness in its most practical terms means treating your neighbor, children, wife, employer, employees, superiors, and institutions with proper respect and love. That respect and love may at times appear more harsh than soft when discipline and boundaries must be established. The violator must be loved, but confronted, coached, and given proper instruction as to the fair and right boundaries of his territory. Fairness, justice, kindness, temperance, truth, and other virtues comprise the quiver of Godliness.

2) After a national Revival of Godliness, the sequences toward Limited Government may proceed from the top down, commencing with the commitment of the nation to Godliness at the highest level of national priority. a) The reversal of Everson vs. Board of Education bill that established by fiat Judicial activism the previously unknown, and unconstitutional precedent of “Separation of Church and State”. b) The reversal of Judicial decisions that take the 10 commandments from public buildings. c) The reversal of Judicial decisions preventing prayer and Bible reading in school. With this restoration of law that allows the next generation to carry on the faith of our Fathers, we can without impediment reinstate the extension of Godliness to every phase of government.

3) The sanctification should proceed in a parallel fashion, with all members, groups, and strata of society studying the Bible, learning the principles of Godly relationship, debating and studying how this applies to their particular life, making policy, and extending the discussion and enrollment to their superiors and inferiors. If we are to consider the transformation of the society from the top down, as in a leadership model, then the highest-ranking leaders (chief executive, cabinet and judges) will be the leaders in establishing Godly policy in their Agencies, and the leaders at each successive layer of management would do the same.

4) The people have the vote, and they must use their discrimination to elect governors, legislators, and judges who are mature in the faith, committed to putting on Godliness and restoring our way of life to its Godly heritage.
5) They are at the heart of government and give laws their power by interpreting and enforcing legislation. The bureaucrats must frame their reading of legislation in terms of the spirit of Godliness so as to properly direct the professions, trades, and corporations in righteous activity.

6) The influence of Godliness on the highest management throughout the society will trickle down through the layers of managers and workers in the professions, associations, administrative bureaucracies, corporations, managers, professionals, families, and children.

7) The media biases and shades the entirety of perceived reality. We no longer live in a world that is directly perceived. Our concept of the universe beyond our horizon is filtered, processed, and presented through the lens of someone and their agenda. The Bill of Rights gave us freedom of the press, but corporate interests and biases toward social radicalism have monopolized the information-space. They have directed our choices and made voting an exercise in giving public support to private enterprise large enough to pay for buying the public mind. Information must be made objective by intent. Commentary should be allowed, encouraged, and expected that frames the events of the day in terms of Godliness. Many commentators and much debate should be offered from many sides, but it should overtly confront how the daily stream of current events relate to Godliness.

As the society becomes more righteous, as per Matthew 22, placing God’s Law first in each man’s heart, and in turn loving neighbor as self, the society will become more refined at each layer in its functioning and relationship in Godly manners.
The society is affected from the top down, and the bottom up. As the people making up a group become more Godly, and they learn to give and take equitably, the professions and trades they occupy will become more Godly in their service of society. As the Associations learn Godly discipline, teaching, and regulation of their members, then the Administrative layer of Government that regulates the professions and trades becomes less necessary. Eventually, the Associations of professionals, trades, and corporations can take over the role of the Administrative Law, and this layer of government, which is currently so expensive and populous, can be largely eliminated.

An example of a profession regulating itself is seen in the Bar of lawyers, a privately operated, self-regulated, enforced, funded and administered group that is trusted by society to maintain the standards of Godliness among their practitioners. Of course Godliness has been lost as the standard by which Lawyers regulate themselves, and as a result, the trust society has placed in them is unfounded. But, this is an example of privatization of administrative law that has already been implemented, and it also illustrates the futility of expecting that privatization by itself will produce the intended result of moral optimization of professional self-regulation.

The same retreat of Government may occur in all arenas of regulation: energy, education, law, commerce, environment, etc. When the commitment to Godliness in control of self and in relationship to others is present, then there is no need for the overbearing force of Government to enforce Godliness. Rather, when those in society embrace Godliness as their primary directive and purpose, every layer and element within each layer of government and private industry becomes an agent of unified regulation to manifest the mind of Christ.

When Godliness is the prime directive of society at all levels, the layers of government become less and less necessary. Administrative government can be seen as a temporary teaching and modeling role to guide the Associations into establishing the proper machinery for Godly self-regulation. The layers of regulation by government can thus be abandoned, as their duties are relinquished to their corollaries in the private sector.

Of course, the dismantling of government agencies means that former public servants will be released from their duties and must be re-integrated into life as private employees. A note that may provide a bridge is that they could migrate into jobs as officers of the professional guilds in their regulatory functions. But ultimately, we wish to increase the labor force and hope that most will retrain and become productive members of society creating value by using their skills.

The natural outcome of this adoption of Godliness by the people, and their unions, associations, and guilds is the diminishment of government. As Godliness and the training and enforcement of right action are transferred to the people and their privately run organs of self-regulation, many of government’s current functions become largely unnecessary.

Such is the goal of Godliness, to let God be our king. Note that the cry of the Revolutionary War was “No King but King Jesus.” This is the goal, to have only righteousness and the spirit that directs righteousness be our overarching ruler to which we all submit. Until we all bow at that altar, we will be slaves of men and institutions that keep our animalistic passion underfoot. Such subjugation is well and right and all that man deserves until he has put on the adult maturity of Godliness. We must ultimately subject ourselves willingly, with awe, respect, and love to our Father God. He is the source of all, and to whom we bow and worship for the magnificent creation.

The overarching problem that must be solved is that,
Jeremiah 17:9 “The heart is deceitful above all things, And desperately wicked; Who can know it?”

Thus, the self-interest of man must be properly regulated in some way. The individual who asks for too much is like a cancer, occupying too much space, and taking too many resources. Those around him, unless they are effective warriors that beat back the aggression, may be damaged by his excessive consumption and occupation of space. If the individual grows in influence and organizes a company, gets elected as a legislator, appointed as a judge or administrator, he can extend his malignant influence to a greater degree and cause an industry or governmental bureaucracy to revolve around his desire for expansion of influence. There must be some force to oppose the bullies and cancerous tumors of life, industry, and government.

We should all have the standard of perfection, the pattern of health, the Law of God in our hearts, and when we see the invader, the unrighteous man and his action in our midst, we should take it upon ourselves to exert a force to stop him. Such is the place of personal power. It is our personal responsibility to make the world a Godly place by expelling the evil which seeks to manifest through the hearts of men. When the bullies and tyrants of youth are poorly controlled, they can become tyrants and lead a nation to wars of aggression and enroll the entire world in destructive wars of containment or defense. The police with shiny badges and guns are needed and appreciated when they enforce and judge according to the standards of Godliness, but when they are the agents of bullies, tyrants, and megalomaniacs we shudder in their presence and hate their subjugation.

Thus, it is not government that we hate, rather it is unrighteous and unGodly government that we cannot tolerate. It is the bonds of evil, unGodliness, and the intrusion of the agents of Hell whose bonds we seek to cast off.

Limited Government is a realistic goal as a later stage in the development of a Righteous society. When a Godly government develops, and the society follows suit (or is the reflection of the righteousness of the people) the various layers of government may fall off. When the government is no longer needed to create and enforce the righteousness that we all desire, government should follow the Framer’s intent of limited government and cheerfully execute the process of dissolution and transfer power to the private sector.

This progression toward dissolution of the bureaucracies will happen most strongly when the nation has committed itself to Godliness. The people will fear letting corporations, trades, and professions rule themselves if there is no commitment to Godliness in that sector; the fox should never be put in charge of watching the henhouse. To allow a self-interested profession to regulate itself is to invite abuse in the form of bullies and thieves.

A primal desire of the heart is to understand the origin of the universe and life and to feel complete in its relationship with its creator on all levels. If society has not embraced God as its overt source, then the miraculous will be missing at some level, and the creatures will still be longing for completion of their hearts’ desire.
Taxes, for the purpose of supporting the regulatory bureaucracy, become less and less onerous as government shrinks. But taxes may take another form, such as association, bar, union, or guild dues. If the need for group coordination still exists, employees must be hired or volunteers must execute those duties. Thus, the forceful arm of coercion may not disappear completely even in the post-Administrative Law era. The professional standards must still be enforced, and due will go to enforce our proper professional standards and duties. But, given the structure, where the people will more readily submit to the jury and rules of their colleagues. These laws, regulations, and policies are self-imposed. Since the professional associations are committed to righteousness, we know that the regulations at least have the intent of Godliness. We can thus hope and expect that the penalty for violations would actually reflect an appropriate chastening that is needed to restore rather than mechanically punish.

The majority of the functions of government can be transferred to the private sector when sufficient infrastructure in the private sector has been established. But again, the manifestation of Limited Government as a realized actual possibility arises out of the intelligent expression of Godliness. The perfection of Godly and Lawful Righteousness in a people makes Limited Government possible.

T.

America’s Foundation Burning

Thomas Lee Abshier, ND
1/21/2011

http://www.sidroth.org/site/News2?abbr=tv_&page=NewsArticle&id=9687

John, in a previous essay, you justified the irrelevance of the choice of the governmental system if the people were all perfectly moral.  I will concede your point.  In the extreme example where men behave as angels and gods, the most totalitarian system will be as adequate as the most anarchic state.  But, as you will readily agree, regardless of man’s desire to be perfect, he will never be, even at the most mature of ages and most diligent in seeking.  The vast majority will fall short of perfection, and possibly even the entirety of mankind will fail at perfect duplication of the Character of God and Mind of Christ in their daily lives.  And certainly, at any moment, many citizens will be a significant distance from sainthood, since childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood is inherently a time of ignorance, foolishness, errors in judgment, and untamed passion.  Thus, the state will always have in its populace those who are imperfectly capable of implementing the principles of our Constitutional Republic, and some of those may rise to positions of leadership.

As you note, the best governmental, and non-governmental solution to organizing society must be organized around the imperfections of men.  But, the further men are from the perfected Mind of Christ, the more they will tend to implement forceful solutions upon the populace since the pathological, antisocial, narcissistic personality types typically seek and obtain power.

An immoral people (men choosing to pursue the lusts of the flesh, lusts of the eyes, and pride of life without restraint or resistance) tend to have a complex of aberrations of personality.  (Note: I define aberration as anything diverging from the mind of Christ).  The leaders of such people tend to be tyrants since the nature of aberration is being unrestrained in the invasion of the boundaries of their neighbors.  Power hungry leaders (or leaders with no other tools other than laws, judgment, and enforcement) will use the violations of a minority of individuals as an excuse/justification for placing the nation in legal chains.  Their motivation may seem high minded, presented as a program to prevent the masses from destroying themselves, each other, and their environment.

One form of the Libertarian solution is to let this potpourri of good and evil people come to an equilibrium using various social feedback methods (market, mini-government, ethics-based communities,…) and let the feedback people receive from their own actions to teach them what works, and allow the various communities to rise or sink to their own level of function based on their particular ethic and system of administering feedback.  This may work.  It has never been tried in modern times.

Anarchy was possibly tried in antiquity, before Noah, where things did not turn out well then.  Under that system people became so wicked that God destroyed the world by flood.  I don’t think society would quickly revert to this level of depravity if we suddenly released all the laws from America because there are many people who are committed to goodness.  I believe Libertarianism would work reasonably well as long as the society has the boundaries of the Judeo-Christian ethic as its moral base.  But, as you note, most any other system of government would work on such a well behaved group.  So, the issue is more about what system minimizes the restrictions, governmental regulatory overhead, and tax burden to support that public infrastructure.  I believe that combination of the Constitutional Republic, capitalism, and the Judeo-Christian ethic will produce that minimization of governmental burden, while maximizing happiness, freedom, and prosperity.

I believe any other organization will ultimately produce a less free, less happy, less prosperous social outcome.  I do not know if the purely Libertarian solution will converge into the place of maximal freedom and happiness, just by allowing the system to evolve by the market feedback mechanisms superimposed upon an anarchic society.  My feeling is that it would not, simply because the human psyche is so set in its ways once adulthood arrives that unless each generation was brought up in goodness, and trained and disciplined in its ways, I don’t think the social feedback systems would be adequate to prevent invasion or shape excellence once adulthood has arrived.

An important point is that maximum freedom is not achieved by the absence of laws.  By analogical illustration, the maximal freedom of the car is experienced when restraining its wheels and body on the road and away from other vehicles and objects.  Violating these laws results in damage to the car, life, property, and impairs its ability to continue to move.  Thus, anarchy is not the freest society.  Rather, a rightly organized society, one that reflects the actual rules that man must live by, is the most free society.

In any case, the societal/government organization that I continue to argue for is the Constitutional Republic, and that organized around the personal and group principles applied as metaphors/analogies/applications of principles illustrated in the Holy Bible.

As the Founders organized our Constitution, we have what may be the near-perfect compromise between minimal law and maximal freedom.  The Constitution allows for the coexistence of a weak central government and states rights.  Both freedom and law can be given in this system.  The law will necessarily be more specific in the cities, but the individual has more control over the local laws, such as local ordinances, and successively lesser control at the level of the counties, states, and nation.  Government so organized would naturally codify the broad principles in the higher governmental legal/judicial/executive legal codes, and more specifically in the local codes.

A state/county/locale which wishes to allow an almost complete Libertarian solution could do so, and sanction activities that are antithetical to the Judeo-Christian ethic to express themselves as they wish (porn, abortion, homosexual expression, polygamy, incest, pedophilia, sexual etcetera, drugs, pagan worship, idolatry, Sharia…).  Likewise, a state may choose to be separate from such expression, have every right to put up walls of law, and expressions of force as needed, to protect against those who would encroach into their holy cities.  And finally, a state may allow a mix of strong rule-based and libertarian systems.  The polarization between states, counties, and cities provides its own feedback that may produce a deeper polarization or homogenization.  Regardless, there can be little moral objection about being subject to the majority vote when living in a city/county/state of one’s choice, since influence and relocation is always an option.

My point is, that if we are going to organize ourselves as a Constitutional Republic, with laws, strata of organization (i.e., family, city, county, state, nation), that the maximal freedom (integrated over the full spectrum of the experience of life and all its facets) will be experienced within the boundaries of a prescribed set of laws, where those laws are inspired by the Judeo-Christian ethic, and the people choose to consciously try to follow those precepts.  And while the people and laws are both imperfect, the structure of the Constitution produces sufficient checks, balances, and interaction between government, groups, industry, and individuals that the averaging effect is a maximal experience of freedom, happiness, and prosperity.  I believe all other implementations of government will be sub-optimal in their production of freedom, happiness, and prosperity.

The video link above is of Sid Roth interviewing a fellow (Rick Joyner) who had a dream (actually he had many prophetic dreams that came true).  In this one dream, in particular, he was in a house, and he saw America in its many different enterprises, symbols, cultures, and landscapes outside of its windows.  And while in the house he continued to see small fires burst up through the floor, which were stomped out by his guides who were showing him the house.  As he was leaving the house, another small fire burst up through the floor.  He went back inside, smothered the fire, and noted a hole had burned through, through which he could see under the house.  The entire foundation was on fire, and this was the source of the small fires that he had seen breaking through.

The analogy is obvious.  Our moral foundation is being burned and our entire civilization will collapse if we do not return to our founding principles, which are the Kingdom principles.  It isn’t the pagans, atheists, Islamists, communists, new agers, humanists, Satanists, cultists, or eastern religions that are the problem.  It is the people of the Church of Christ that must stand up and say yes and no, and do so with wisdom.  As a Christian nation, those who claim to follow Christ, we have stood only weakly on the principles of the Judeo-Christian ethic.  I believe this timidity and poorly articulated direction springs from the lack of a strong philosophical conviction as to the proper application of Christian principles to secular life.  This is what the body of my writing has been an attempt at elaborating.

T.

Critique of Utopianism (Socialism)

by: Thomas Lee Abshier, ND
5/28/2010

From: Thomas Lee Abshier, ND
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 11:39 PM
To: John
Subject: Looking Backward

John, I’ve spent a few hours today reading the book you recommended, “Looking Backward”, published in 1888, which you said is the Socialist’s best presentation of the problems of capitalism and the utopian solutions of socialism.  I’m only a few chapters into it, but could not resist the temptation to comment on the concepts introduced so far.

Julian West, the narrator of the book, who had slept for 113 years from 1887 to 2000, has just begun to listen to his new 21st-century friend, Dr. Leete, talk about how the world had transformed from a grim and dirty capitalistic world, into a socialistic workers’ paradise.  Dr. Leete has just given a critique of the “old capitalistic world”, and attributed the problems of capitalism as being due to the concentration of capital.

In real life, Looking Backward reached great popularity after its publication in 1888.  In response to its socialist/utopian vision, a political movement called “Nationalism” sprang up, and the book was referenced in many Marxist writings of the era.

At your recommendation, I have taken on reading this book as an exercise in identifying the errors of the philosophy of socialism/communism/statism.  If in fact these systems do not produce as much prosperity, freedom, or joy, then there must be reasons either in human nature (i.e. drives that cause men to act/not act), or in the rules/consequences that are active in the relationship between God and man (i.e. God has embedded organizing forces in nature and men which oppose pure collectivism).

The concentration of Capital under Control of the State:
As an opening critique and solution, Looking Backwards posits that the problems of capitalism are due to the impersonal nature and power of large corporations.  They can demand long hours and low pay due to their domination of the market.  Looking backward sees no relief in the trends of capitalism because of the natural progression of mergers and acquisitions to produce an ever-greater concentration of capital in ever-fewer companies.

Looking Backward presents the solution to the problems of capitalism by as taking the progression of corporate mergers to its logical conclusion and concentrating all capital production and distribution enterprises in one point under the control of the State/nation.

But, mergers will not proceed to completion to form the one large corporation controlled by the State.  Nevertheless, Looking Backward proposes this counterintuitive method as the solution to the problems of capitalism.  Concentrating capital in the State is simply a method by which all activities of life and all people in the society, can be directed by the State.  Thus a solution deemed right and good by central planners is imposed upon all people.  The socialistic solution gives those who imagine they have the solution to the problems of a free market the power of the State to impose their hypothetical solutions on the masses of humanity.

On its surface, it seems plausible given that all the problems associated with capitalism, such as monopoly, overwork, underpay, strikes, corruption, inequality, illiteracy, delinquency, and war would disappear when government took over, and mandated solutions that countered these problems.  The socialist argues that brute animal passions dictate the free market and produce a system characterized by chaotic inequity.  Whereas, the socialistic solution solves all these problems by the direction of intelligent and rational men.  Labor, goods, and investment move according to the direction of learned men and thoughtful policies.  Sadly, a structure which allows for total power over a people attracts the worst of men, and their economic-political systems end in oppressive regimes that require force to maintain the order they impose.

“Governments need armies to protect them against their enslaved and oppressed subjects.”  – Leo Nikolaevich Tolstoi (1828-1910)

The urge to merge:
Assuming that corporations will naturally choose to merge to form larger and larger entities is a somewhat plausible conjecture on its surface, but deeper analysis shows that this trend will reach a point of maximum merger size and concentration in a free market.

The natural draw of business to expand is plausible because the owner/entrepreneur is driven by the prospect of personal enrichment.  The owner who draws a fixed percentage from his business can increase his personal wealth if his company’s net income increases.  Owners, executives, and boards see that net total revenues can quickly increase by a merger or acquisition with another profitable entity.  If their operations provide synergy, the sum may be greater than the parts, or at least increase the market share by the combination.  The natural drive for riches is satisfied by concentrating capital, at least in some conditions.

But, the assumption of a natural progression toward an ultimate concentration of all capital in the State must be questioned, as the actual experience of history has proven it false to date.  Over 120 years of actual history, we see that a freely ordered, self-organizing economy, has chosen to remain divided into a spectrum of micro, small, medium, and large capitalization business entities.  In other words, the market does not have a necessary natural evolution from small to large.

Rather than being a natural progression to a single corporate entity, the ever-increasing size of corporations into a single government corporation will only come about by government command.  The socialist has decided this is a good and desirable end since government is then authorized to impose good behavior upon everyone in the society.  The socialist/utopian goal is the elimination of all the bad aspects of life (e.g. unemployment, poverty, professional confusion, crime, war…) by ordering the lives of mankind by a set of rules that properly order and direct humanity.  This is a noble goal, the end is desirable, and the method is plausible, but there are errors of assumption that make this method of perfecting society unworkable.

A Metaphor from Chemistry – The Natural Size of Corporations:
Using a chemical metaphor, consider two chemicals mixed and reacting in a flask.  In a reaction that does not go to completion, there is a portion of the reactants that react and form products and a portion of the products break up and form reactants.  This is an example of an equilibrium concentration being formed between reactants and products.  In general, reactions in real-world conditions do not go to completion (i.e. there is still a portion of reactants that do not proceed to form products when the reaction comes to equilibrium).

Generalizing from this example, systems that both form and break apart come to an equilibrium concentration of reactants and products for any given environment.  In other words, at a low temperature, the reaction may go to near total completion, but at high temperature, there is sufficient energy to break apart the product and the reaction does not go to completion.  Thus, the environment of the reaction is extremely important in computing the equilibrium point, as it changes drastically as the environment changes (e.g. pH, temperature, pressure…).

Examining the dynamics of the free market, there is a force pushing business toward concentration by mergers and acquisitions, but there is also a reverse process too, where businesses split and divest themselves of inharmonious divisions.  Thus, the centripetal concentration force driving mergers and acquisitions is opposed by a competing centrifugal tendency toward spin-off in the presence of internal disharmony.

To bring this metaphor down to its the relevant economic specifics, small companies can react together by merging and forming a larger corporation, or a larger company can break up or spin off parts/divisions and proceed as two separate entities.  In a free environment, companies will merge and concentrate to the point at which they maximize their profitability (profit/share).  When their profitability drops due to their increase in size, they may break apart or spin-off to return to profitability.  In any given free market environment, a balance forms between the concentration of small, medium and large industrial-business-service-manufacturing-materials entities.  The key to capitalism is its flexibility in adapting the production solution to meet the consumer’s needs, which will change dynamically to optimize in each consuming and producing environment.

The utopian solution to the problems of production and allocation of wealth is to place the State in charge of all capital.  Here, size and profitability no longer correlate to optimize productivity.  The state-corporate leviathan simply directs production to satisfy the projected needs of the market.  Bureaucrats, central planners, politicians, economists, and executives direct the productive and consumptive flow by command and judgment of what they believe is good and optimal.  In this environment, one that requires concentration of capital under penalty of the State, there is no equilibrium between large and small sized corporations, only the uniformity of top-down direction regardless of the needs of the micro-environments.

The Purpose of Life, Freedom, and Utopian Selfless Service:
God created the creation, mankind, and society to function around the principles of reward for merit and consequence for error.  The pattern of the Kingdom of Heaven is illustrated in Jesus’ parable of the man with 10 talents, 5 talents, and 1 talent.  The men who performed well received a reward and those who did nothing were punished.  This is a divine pattern and the society that violates it will suffer.  Men must be rewarded according to their productivity.  Being paid the same as all others, at a rate that is adequate to meet an average standard of living, and given an acknowledgment for being an extremely productive worker, is not adequate compensation to inspire outstanding performance.

The Declaration of Independence declares that all men were given the inalienable (God-given) rights of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.  But, the utopian wishes to guarantee happiness, and to deliver this promise, he expects that all men will overcome their animal tendencies to sloth and greed.  “Looking Backward” posits that mankind will respond with self-sacrificial, potential-maximizing effort in return for security and prosperity for self and group.  But, since Looking Backward was penned in 1888, all the socialist experiments have met with abysmal failure.  The Leninist and Maoist regimes tried to change human nature and produced horrific human suffering.  Rebellion against the government was met by imprisonment and/or execution.

The socialist revolution sought to replace the passions of men, and cycles of the free market, with a constant flow of predictable production.  But the cost of eliminating choice and risk resulted in a regimentation of men’s lives.  Life with assured security and prosperity loses its dimension of risk and challenge.  When total provision is made for all, men lose the opportunity to overcome their demons in real life testing.  The soul longs to purify itself and overcome the demons of fear, greed, lust, anger, and pride, and only an environment containing true risk can develop and test a man’s character.  Freedom implies the opportunity for failure, and men long for, and fear, an environment that offers both choice, accountability, risk and reward.  Life at its finest offers both rewards for success and consequences for failure.

The free market allows for real-world testing and feedback that appeals to our inner drive to test and purify our character.  Service of the group is good and noble, but it should be done out of choice, not compulsion.  Virtue can be recommended, but cannot be forced.  The socialistic philosophy is seductive because it commands all men to live with good and Godly principles such as service, charity, and industry, but the boundaries imposed on men put them in chains.  Requiring men to serve under the direction of the State removes freedom and places every man in a place of option-less servitude to the state – a place little different than the slavery against which we have rejected as a nation.

Inequality:
Inequality has reached the pinnacle of modern social-economic evils that the new socialist utopia promises to overcome.  The disparity between rich and poor is presented as axiomatic evidence of the evil of inequality.  And using this justification, governmental programs that enforce equality are enacted.  The progressive income tax and inheritance tax are two obvious examples of wealth redistribution/equalizing measures.  The concept of enforcing equality may have already become a majority opinion, as the 2008 presidential campaign promised a redistribution by “spreading the wealth around” as a right and proper concept of “social justice”.

But, inequality cannot be eliminated without eliminating freedom.  Wealth will necessarily, and appropriately, be unequally distributed as long as wealth reflects a disparity of talent, productivity, skill, training, risk, effort, invention, blessing, and luck.  In fact, inequality is good, since a life with gradient gives the possibility of freedom, movement, and overcoming.  The hope of greater wealth, pleasure, luxury, comfort, or efficiency motivates men to work harder and smarter.  The possibility of failure inspires those who are not producing to faith and works in the hope of reward.

The trap of wealth is the illusion that it will provide happiness and those who have attained the heights of fortune uniformly attest to the insufficiency of wealth to fill the heart adequately.  John D. Rockefeller, when asked once, “How much money is enough money?”  He replied, “Just a little bit more.”  Still, wealth is better than poverty, but by itself is not enough to be worshiped and pursued as the goal that will make life satisfying, full, and complete.

The problems and reformation of capitalism:
The problems of capitalism such as greed, hedonistic excess, white collar crime, poverty, monopoly, unfair competition, insecurity, immobility, long hours, boring work, difficulty of entrance, and cycles of boom and bust, would all appear best solved by a communal effort to create adequate wealth sufficient to provide for everyone’s comfort.  But, every experiment attempting this seemingly noble equalization of benefits has produced less aggregate wealth than our current system of freedom and its associated inequality.  The question is actually, how to modify the free market to produce the maximum wealth and mitigate the pain of its abuse.  It is tempting to pass laws that outlaw the negative aspects, and mandate the positive, but then we return to the problems of demotivation associated with a command economy.

The reformation of capitalism will only come with the reformation of men’s hearts.  When men sanctify their personal and public sense of fair play and righteousness, and take that into the marketplace, and refuse to bend to the pressures of quick profits that unfair and unrighteous tactics offer, the cycles of business will smooth, and the general welfare will gradually improve.  The lure of quick wealth is the snare that ends in poverty for all.  The consumer is the enabler of unethical business practices, and he must be willing to boycott and thereby punish those who engage in prurient or false advertising.  The consumer is king in the market as long as there is competition, and he should use that power to discipline those who stray beyond the bounds of the highest ethics.

The solutions offered in Looking Backward are based upon the producing and consuming public adopting charitable and industrious behaviors, but the socialist/utopian solutions are unworkable because they attempt to control human natures by the mandates of government.  The same excellent results desired by the utopian could be manifested by the capitalist if each man in industry and consumption were to sanctify his soul with relationship to money, work/consumption.

Reforming a nation by changing individual minds of an entire people is a large task, and will no doubt require an element of the miraculous.  The problems of poverty will not resolve with socialistic solutions, nor with unfettered capitalism as their only tools.  But, capitalism sanctified will usher in an era of continually increasing prosperity with freedom held intact.  The requirement for this success depends upon men as a society, choosing to bridle their passions and be charitable as well as industrious.  Putting on Godliness in the realm of money, consumption, and production will solve the problems of poverty, merit-based distribution of wealth, pollution, innovation, opportunity, and crime.  The socialistic or government mandated solutions result in pain and chains.

Theft and Corruption:
Men need goods and services to survive, and when basic needs are satisfied, they begin in earnest the pursuit of comfort, relaxation, or thrill that wealth can bring.  Greed drives men to lie, murder, take large risks, and work without a proper balance.  Greed may drive men to steal to obtain the personal benefits/enrichment that comes with greater wealth.  The spirit of greed tempts men with animal passions to pursue unearned wealth, and will relentlessly challenge him if those spirits and actions are not confronted, resisted, and replaced with a sanctified version of the temptation.

Charity is good, and providing for the basic needs of survival or comfort to the homeless man, gang member, ignorant, foolish, or addict is noble, but will only produce a curative solution to the extent that the basic patterns of truth are also taught along with the aid.

Men need an outlet to exhaust the beast inside the soul.  Without a real-life challenge to push against, a percentage will choose to express themselves by pushing inappropriately against boundaries – “rebellion for the hell of it.”  “Rebel without a Cause.”  Without a direction, without a focus, the entire purpose of life comes into question.  All the propaganda about equality and service to the State and general welfare becomes meaningless pabulum when the heart is unsatisfied in a world of enforced mediocrity.

The utopian hypothesis of theft, graft, and corruption fading into obsolescence in a world where the State has taken on the role of provider of the basic necessities has shown itself trivially untrue.  Men always desire more comfort, thrills, or pleasure.  A nation of people satisfied with the status quo stagnates.  Thus, the real solution manifests in a society where the individual can fully pursue his desires and engage his passion by sincerely applying talent, will, and vision to accomplish dreams.

And yes, there are those who have little passion for extreme achievement.  Some men are satisfied by repetitive tasks and predictable schedules, and this is an acceptable choice for those who wish to pursue it.  But, others require more challenge, and to organize society around uniform compensation, and expect outstanding achievement, is to create a fantasy world equivalent to cartoons, fairy tales, science fiction, and myth.

As for those who are willing to violate Godly interpersonal boundaries, there must be an intra-societal policing that prevents men from advancing their personal gain by criminal efforts.  The quick and obvious solution is to dedicate the role of policing, judging, and enforcement to government.  But, in a free society, each person must dedicate a measure of time and effort to judging those around him.  Everyone is his brother’s keeper to a degree, we are all related by the fact that our actions influence the web of life, we cannot separate ourselves completely from the actions and effects of others.  Thus, if nothing more than a requirement of self-preservation, must all take the responsibility of judging and confronting those who violate the laws of righteous, fair, good, and Godly law.  If we do not take that responsibility, then the State or God will take that role and judgment and enforcement will be imposed upon us.

Part of assuming one’s place as an adult in society is taking on the role of teacher, parent, guardian, or owner.  If all participate in this responsibility, we each have many corrective forces act upon us.  No one becomes God to another, but God can speak through the group voice with such volume, clarity, and uniformity that the conscience and soul can be rightly directed.  Peer pressure has power, and while not irresistible, a group allied together in a direction is not easily resisted.  In such a world, none escape the rebuke and group judgment that comes when all participate in sharing their perception of violation.

In such a system, the judge also receives feedback.  Each man’s perception and delivery of right judgment is sharpened by confrontation and counter-confrontation.  The result is fair pay for work, pleasant and appropriate relationships, and a level playing field that rewards effort and allows entry based on qualifications and character.

We all have the right to voice an opinion, and we all have a right to oppose or object to an opinion.  We can oppose someone who is attempting to pursue an unrealistic or imprudent dream, and the dreamer has the right to oppose the counsel and continue his growth and preparation to manifest the impossible dream.  Those who violate the sacred boundary of a man’s soul and prevent him from pursuing a Godly passion by force receive confrontation.

Bribery, cronyism, and petty kingdoms corrupt justice and Godly judgment.  Exposing the violator to an endless stream of gentle to harsh personal/group censure will defeat the will of those who violate the boundaries of property and soul.

Barriers to Entry:
The utopian criticizes the capitalistic system as closing the door to manifesting a dream to all who wish to enter the entrepreneurial arena without a large capital deposit.  This is truly a hurdle one must cross to enter the realm of business.  But, is it bad or wrong for life to have barriers?  Should there be a different standard for entry to challenge the inventor, businessman, manufacturer, or banker?  What is the more optimal test of worthiness?  How should society instead select who proceeds on with the authorization of the capitalist?

The capitalistic system uses the test of wealth accumulation (from self or others) as a requirement for initiating a small business.  And, this is an appropriate standard, as per Biblical standards.  We see scripture command us (paraphrased) “do not despise small beginnings,” and “How can a man be trusted with true spiritual/eternal wealth, if he has not shown himself faithful in the care of earthly riches.”   The initial startup capital usually comes from personal savings, venture capital, angel gift, friend/family loan/investment, or saving from labor in another enterprise to devote to establishing the new one.  But, in some way, the executive, the entrepreneur, the small businessman has shown himself trustworthy by executing other tasks faithfully first.

Society and economy in this realm mimic one of the most pervasive of all metaphors of nature – the activation energy.  The initial capital investment into a business is the equivalent of the activation energy that must be brought into a system before a reaction can take place.

Using chemistry as an example, two atoms will not react and bond unless they have adequate activation energy.  The two atoms must have enough kinetic energy available to overcome the repulsive force of their outer electron orbitals.  In so doing, electrons from the two reactant atoms can intermingle and form a bond of mutually shared electrons.  A great deal of energy can be released by forming a structure of lower potential energy.

Adding to this concept of bonding atoms, we introduce the concept of the enzyme or catalyst.  The presence of a catalyst reduces the amount of energy needed by the reactant atoms to form the bond.

First, the entrepreneur needs the activation energy of startup capital to bring him into contact with the process of forming the business entity.  The business entity once formed is the catalyst for the formation of wealth from two reactants – raw materials and labor.  In the case of entrepreneurship, the setup energy is large, but once the activation energy of organization, invention, training… is complete, a much larger output results.  The business functions in the metaphorical role of enzyme or catalyst.  It takes a great deal of manufacturing energy to form the enzyme/catalyst but once formed/created, it can with relatively little energy input (compared to production without the organization of the machine) produce a continuous stream of wealth at low cost.

The owner/entrepreneur can then take a portion of the energy output of the machine as a reward for having invested the pain, intention, sacrifice of time, and divining the invention.  Without the possibility of reward for the work and risk of building the catalytic business entity, little innovation would occur.

Capitalism vs. Socialism; State vs. Soul:
God wants man to prosper, and to love Him.  God treats the State as a secondary consideration, more as a reflection of the hearts of men, rather than as a primary love-relationship.  God rewards men with a good State when as a group their souls are pure and aligned with His will and way.  Without righteous hearts, men struggle in vain for peace, happiness, and prosperity.  Men have eternal spirits, and the spirit is clothed with the soul, and the soul energizes and enlivens the body.  Man has a relationship with God on all levels, body, soul, and spirit, and God blesses individuals according to their righteousness and relationship with Him.  The blessings of the State flow secondarily from the righteousness of its people.  The organization and prosperity of the State are of secondary importance to the state of men’s hearts.

The Achilles heel of the socialist/utopian State is the lack of individual reward given to those who develop new and witty inventions.  Without reward, men will not be motivated to invest the hard work of developing new machines/enzymes/catalysts for converting labor & resources into useful goods and services.  Without the incentive of personal profit, some (Few? Many?) will not have sufficient motivation to engage the hard work of manifesting these new inventions.  Others may be facilitated or encouraged by government programs that support invention.  The experience of previous socialistic experiments gives evidence that the State will sink into the mediocrity of old technology or slowly advancing innovation.  The lack of personal reward for innovation is a major deficiency in the utopian/socialist world.

So, that’s the book report and analysis for tonight.
T.


Tom,
I like your analysis.  Parts of it are said better than I thought about.  But my advice is to resist the temptation to analyze until you are finished with the book.  The author presents more interesting arguments (anecdotal evidence) toward the end of the book. I am glad you are reading it!  We will have lots to talk about.
John

Live the Bible and Vote – Book Summary

Live the Bible and Vote – 3000 Word Jacket Cover Intro
By Thomas Lee Abshier, ND
Copyright 2023

Live the Bible and Vote is an analysis of the justification for using the Bible as a standard of morality in the conduct of personal, group, and government acts.

The 1947 Everson vs. Board of Education opinion of the SCOTUS used the premise of “A high wall of separation between church and state” to prohibit the Christian church from influencing state decisions.  Thomas Jefferson originally used the phrase when he assured the Danbury Baptist Association that the government would never interfere in the church’s affairs because of the wall of separation between church and state. Throughout American history, Christianity and the Bible have been tightly intertwined in the acts of government, and the principles of the Bible are the foundation of the Constitution. The greatness and prosperity of America can be plausibly and causally linked. For this reason, the Bible should continue to be included in the culture, schools’ curriculum, the halls of legislature, the courts of the land, and the administrative offices of local, state, and national governments. The dethroning of God, the Bible, and the Lordship of Jesus from our culture and government can only be categorized as a Satanic coup, and we have witnessed the decay of America because of turning our backs on the source of all life and blessing.

To recover the shining city on a hill, Camelot, the promised land joy of America, political theorists have anointed “Liberty” as the new highest principle of goodness. Libertarianism is the most seductive form of the Secular Humanist religion. This religion judges all human interactions based on the principle that only free acts are good. Of course, this is incorrect, so these qualifiers were added; all acts which are not acts of aggression and are agreed upon by mutual contract are good, lawful, and to be allowed. But this philosophy of government and moral conduct allows for any sexual behavior and calls it good. But such behaviors are expressly anti-Biblical. Thus, strict libertarianism, elevating Liberty as the highest moral virtue, is at odds with Biblical Christianity. As such, Libertarianism is used to enroll Satanic occupation of Americans’ hearts, souls, and lives. We wrestle not against flesh and blood but against powers, principalities, and rulers in high places.

Science has been used as a justification for non-belief in God. Most Americans do not understand physics in great depth, hold scientists as authorities on the mysteries of the universe, and accept their opinions about creation and evolution as fact. The result is that people adopt the opinions of men of science about the ultimate nature of reality, the origin of life, and God’s existence.

In general, Science defends and advocates the non-existence of God. Science argues that the postulate of God is unnecessary, given that quantum mechanics offers a plausible origin of the universe (i.e., Virtual Particles appear to arise out of nothing; therefore, the universe may have also arisen from literally nothing). Likewise, evolution offers a plausible explanation for the appearance of life (i.e., gradual changes and survival advantages of modifications). Thus, Occam’s Razor is imposed by Science (i.e., the correct/real solution is the simpler postulate) as a justification for excluding God since adding a hypothetical God is a more complicated explanation of the universe than a universe without Him. But this logic fails when examining the multiplication of explanatory entities necessary to explain time, energy, space, and mass and the laws they follow.

I believe God’s origin is an unknowable mystery. I do not attempt to penetrate or postulate how God could have originated. Such postulation is impossible to fathom. But the postulation of the universe, mass, and energy from literally nothing is equally unfathomable and mysterious. If mass can arise from literally nothing, then using the same assumption, God can arise from literally nothing. At that point, the question is, “Which postulate of initial ex nihilo origin is a more productive/useful explanation of the universe?”

Having postulated God’s existence as a point of consciousness, how could God manifest the physical universe? Because of a revelatory altered state vision, whose circumstances seemed divinely directed, I saw the relationship between Father, Son, and the creation as a projection of the Father, as a duplication of His Consciousness as the Son. (This explains God saying to Moses, when asked His name, “I Am, That, I Am.” The Son is the same existence as the Father.)

The Son was given the responsibility of creating the entire creation, including the spirit of man. (John 1:1-4In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.  The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.  In him was life; and the life was the light of men.)

The Son created zillions of what I call “Conscious Points,” creating them by imagination as points of consciousness from which to view Himself and the other Conscious Points. All of space is densely filled with Conscious Points.  He gave rules of relationship to each of the Conscious Points – rules by which they attract and repel each other given their distance and velocity. The metric of space is absolute and likewise created as Conscious Points, which do not interact or move and serve as reference points to give absolute position and absolute velocity. Conscious Points interact in Moments, which are discreet periods including three distinct domains: 1) perception, 2) computation, and 3) action.

Of course, the God-created/originated Conscious Point postulate conforms more massively/more tightly to the required simplicity of Occam’s Razor. To maintain the commitment to a Godless universe, conventional physics has allowed a near-infinite multiplication of universes, each with unique properties of nature, to produce our universe accidentally. But if universes arise out of nothing, a more straightforward solution would be pre-universe/pre-creation/pre-God nothingness, in which a near-infinite number of Gods boil out of nothing. If this is the case, then the assumption of our God being one of many gods makes the origin of evil very simple. If all other universes/gods have a different set of physical constants, and theirs can’t support life, but they can affect our universe, then plausibly, they are the evil spirits that are pulling us to unGodliness.

But rather than believing in a multiverse, I choose to believe that our God is the only God, and he created all of creation, and there is none beside Him. In this construction of reality, I believe there is a way of organization of His creation, the configuration of the Conscious Points, which is pleasing to Him, and that which opposes His will and way.  I believe He is the God of the good, the lovely, the healthy, joyous, and prosperous. I believe all that is not in “His Way” is what we define as evil. I believe He (through the Son) created all that is, including evil spirits. I don’t know if He created evil spirits by allowing a rebellion and throwing down a third of the angels, turning them into demons, or self-forming into demons because of being cast out of His presence.

Alternatively, God/The Son created the demons and gave them an appetite for the blood, pain, sorrow/unhappiness, and control of men. When I sin, I partake in the pleasures of evil and create a contract, a debt, an obligation to give my blood/life as payment for consuming the pleasure of evil, and I must pay that debt to the demons/Satan/realm of evil for that pleasure of evil. The demons can use that life/blood, that energy, that organization to power the performance of s-miracles (satanic miracles). Christ died on the cross as an innocent man. Satan shed His blood, took his life, and inflicted pain in His torture, but it was not legal, not warranted. Thus, the death of Jesus Christ was not used to pay His debt – He had none. Thus, the death of Jesus is an unclaimed credit on Satan’s ledger.  As believers in that sacrifice, as disciples, as followers of Him, as men who submit to His will and way as our Lord, we can ask and pray for our account to be cleared and our debt to be canceled. His credit is never consumed. His death was unwarranted, and He still owns the credit for that unrighteous judgment and execution. He loans us His credit; we are cleansed, clear our debt with Satan, and return His credit to Him.  Go and sin no more.

God gave us the rules of the Bible to guide us in righteousness. When we live in His will and way, He can bless us, and life works well.  When we organize our group/nation according to His way, the nation/group prospers. Our nation has turned away from His law, making reading it illegal in public school indoctrination. People follow their animal instincts naturally, but animal instincts do not give us a clue as to the proper moderation of those appetites.  In the excess and deficiency of the satisfaction of the animal appetites, the will and way of the Lord are violated.  His way is found by following His laws (loving God) and loving neighbor as self. We are to love one another as He loved us. There is a standard, and we should walk in it, and the easiest way (probably the only way) is to read the Bible and apply it in your life.  We should do this individually and then influence the group to apply the same principles in the group context. In this way, we can Make America Godly Again.

  • If you sign up for the Newsletter, you will receive an email with a link to download a beta version – a prepublication PDF copy of “Live the Bible and Vote.”
  • Please write a review of the book below in the Comments section. Constructive criticism for improving the manuscript and subjective evaluation of its value, readability, enjoyability, validity, comprehensibility, and style are appreciated.
  • Specific criticism is helpful. Cut and paste a copy of a phrase or paragraph so I can search on it and find it to reword, rethink, elaborate, re-explain, use metaphors/examples, or re-evaluate the concepts.

The Paradox of Unity and Separation

Original Version:
The Necessity of Separation within the Oneness of God
By, Thomas Lee Abshier, ND
1/14/2025

There is an intimate relationship between the existence of God and His creation. Unless God used another source of building material, then he and the universe are connected inherently and eternally. But, the separation between God and the universe is the obvious impression of casual introspection. But deeper examination  (what some call the enlightenment experience), reveals the error of the first impression as obviously false.

This issue, whether God is united with the substance of the universe or separate from His creation, is the central paradox of God’s simultaneous oneness and the necessity of His separation from the world for genuine relationship and love to exist. If God is simply an undifferentiated oneness, with no distinction between Himself and all that exists, then genuine connection and communion would be impossible. But God’s creation of “other” – separate beings with free will – allows for meaningful interaction, choice, and the fulfillment of love.

Thus, separation of some type must exist between God and His creation. Still, this separation cannot be absolute/total if the physical universe’s existence originates in His being. In short, if God is the source and sustainer of all that is, there can be no actual/substantive division between the Creator and His creation. Thus, the paradox cannot be resolved by forcing a simplistic either/or paradigm upon the relationship between the creation and God. Instead, resolution comes by recognizing the multifaceted nature of reality where mutually exclusive facts are true, but only when each is viewed from its own perspective, and the whole is seen to encompass both.

The question of God’s and creation’s unity is useful in considering the meaning of life. I postulate that God created the universe to fulfill His sense of loneliness. If He is the only consciousness, then He is, by definition and fact of reality, without other independent consciousness with which to relate. If God’s nature is love, then He cannot satisfy that nature without the existence of other independent consciousness to relate. For this reason, God created man, gave him free will, and gave him the option of pleasing or displeasing Him. Thus, the temptation to displease God was placed in the center of the Garden of Eden. The temptation offered the opportunity for man to choose to separate from Him. Succumbing to the temptation initiated the dance of God and man, the dance of love which allowed man to be in a relationship with Him and satisfy His need for love.

Man acquiring the knowledge of good and evil was the turning point in the evolution of the relationship between God and man. The state and era of the Garden of Eden was the prototypical example of innocence, a place and time where there was unity with the spirit of God, where God and man dwelt together in the Kingdom of God.

With eyes open, available to choose all options of life, both good and evil, we must return to the Garden. Such is the goal of life. But we cannot return to the Garden by excising, rejecting, or denying our knowledge of good and evil. Instead, we must return to that primeval state as fully mature and wise souls. We must embrace Godliness and eschew the animalistic hunger of the flesh. Such a return is a rebirth, a renaissance of the innocence and joy of fellowship with God in the Garden.

Humanity once existed in an innocent and guileless oneness with the divine. There was no separation on the level of hearts in our ignorance of good and evil. While the idyllic/Edenic state is desirable, we cannot return to it by rejecting the knowledge of good and evil. Our eyes have been opened. That awakening may have been by intention, trickery, rebellion, or ignorance. Regardless, we are now in a state of knowledge and must correctly discriminate between good and evil, with our soul’s fate at stake. By studying, immersion in the Word, choosing goodness/righteousness/Godliness in the face of temptation, making mistakes, confessing, repenting, and then trying again, we mature one step at a time. We must return to the Garden, and that return is advanced by choosing the goodness and joys of childlike simplicity from a place of wise/knowing maturity and conscious choice of Godliness.

The transformation from the inherent oneness of the universe with God to the individuated separateness of humanity was the fundamental innovation of God’s creation that allowed the appearance of the experience of fulfilling adult love by both God and man. The fall, the disobedience, and the becoming aware of good and evil were not mistakes of man unanticipated by God. Instead, this yielding to temptation was an unavoidable step in the evolution of a universe that evolved from the simplicity of the oneness of God to the maturity of man from a child to an adult with a character that mirrors God’s perfection of moral judgment. Only through the introduction of the knowledge of duality (good and evil) and the existence of light and darkness of the spiritual forces could the potential for true wisdom mature and thus satisfy God’s desire for freely given love to arise.

This theme of rebirth and returning to the garden-like state of innocence and openness is central to the vision and mission of the “Renaissance Ministries.” The restoration/rebirth is not to the undifferentiated oneness of God in His initial stages of creation but to a mature, conscious union with the moral principles, way of being, and living in a way pleasing to the nature of God. Such wisdom is forged through the crucible of experience, falling prey to temptation, feeding on the Word, and listening to the leading of the Holy Spirit. Character is hard-won. It requires a daily battle against the internal demons of the flesh that pull us away from choosing His way in each moment.

The rebirth of man into the primal state of the Garden requires a deep understanding of God’s way and the practice of holiness, which is the name and state of our separation from evil. Holiness is not merely separation from the profane but a state of consciously and habitually choosing Godliness as a way of being. That consistent practice of rejecting the temptations of the flesh becomes one’s character, which is the treasure we lay in heaven.

God’s purpose in creating life is living in a relationship with man in a way that fulfills His need/desire for love. Love from the heavenly perspective can only be satisfied through a freely chosen relationship with Him and our fellow man. As the one who is all, He experiences the joy of our righteous/Godly relationships and the pain/repulsion in our violation of His way of being. We must have the free will to choose between worshiping other/false gods (following the passions of the flesh and violating His way) or aligning ourselves with and acting out the will and way of our Creator. Giving our will in submission to the Creator is foundational to our choices and actions having significance.

The foundation of creation, perhaps its greatest miracle, was God’s creation of the substantive appearance that the universe is a reality other than the substance of Himself. The appearance of an actual separation between the Oneness of all creation and man’s experience of the creation was necessary to produce free will and meaningful otherness. This context is the foundation for the experience of meaning and purpose. Meaning arises as man struggles to choose oneness with God’s nature/His way as the substance of our relationship with Him. While the fundamental fact of all creation is its unity, the more profound miracle is that God created a universe where He appears separate and that we can sincerely rationalize the worship of other Gods. We can choose to worship other gods (by acting out the desires of the flesh) and follow the voices of other spirits (listen and act on the temptations), but the satisfaction is short-lived, and the long-term pain is great. True joy and fulfillment come as we choose the delayed gratification and long-term pleasure of living in unity with God’s way.

 

The Paradox of Unity and Separation:
Understanding Our Relationship with God

AI rewrite of essay by, Thomas Lee Abshier, ND
1/15/2025

The relationship between God and His creation presents a profound paradox: the simultaneous existence of divine unity and necessary separation. This tension lies at the heart of understanding both God’s nature and humanity’s purpose.

The fundamental question emerges: If God created the universe from His own being, how can there be true separation between Creator and creation? Yet, this very separation appears essential for genuine relationship and love to exist. Without distinction between God and His creation, meaningful communion would be impossible.

The Garden of Eden story illuminates this paradox. Initially, humanity existed in innocent unity with God, but the introduction of choice – symbolized by the tree of knowledge of good and evil – created the potential for separation. This separation wasn’t a divine oversight but rather a purposeful design enabling genuine love through free will.

God’s motivation for creation may be understood as addressing divine solitude. As the sole consciousness, God’s nature of love required other independent beings capable of choosing relationship. The fall from innocence, while appearing as disobedience, actually initiated the dance of love between God and humanity – a dance requiring both parties to move freely.

However, our goal isn’t to return to naive innocence but to achieve mature wisdom. Having gained knowledge of good and evil, we must consciously choose righteousness. This journey involves studying scripture, facing temptation, learning from mistakes, and growing through repentance. The destination isn’t the unconscious unity of Eden but a conscious, chosen alignment with God’s nature.

This transformation from undifferentiated oneness to individuated consciousness represents God’s innovative solution for enabling genuine love. The apparent separation allows for meaningful choice, while the underlying unity ensures ultimate purpose and connection. Character development through this process – choosing good despite the availability of evil – creates the possibility for authentic relationship with God.

The practice of holiness – consciously choosing God’s way over worldly temptations – builds the character that bridges separation while maintaining distinction. This dynamic balance allows for both individual identity and divine communion, fulfilling God’s desire for freely given love.

The universe’s greatest miracle may be this very illusion of separation within ultimate unity. It creates the context for meaningful choice and genuine relationship, allowing humanity to experience both the consequences of separation and the joy of chosen reunion with divine nature.

In conclusion, the paradox of unity and separation in our relationship with God isn’t a contradiction to be resolved but a dynamic tension to be embraced. It enables the very purpose of creation: the possibility of genuine, freely chosen love between Creator and created.