When Cells Turn Off

The Cell Danger Response, Chronic Illness, and a Christian Understanding of Healing
A Study for Fellowship Discussion 2/8/2026

Download Document

Download Fellowship Discussion Document:

Introduction: A Medical Mystery with Spiritual Dimensions

One of the most frustrating experiences in modern medicine is watching a patient suffer from a condition that defies explanation. The tests come back normal. The specialists shrug. The treatments don’t work. And yet the patient is clearly unwell—exhausted, in pain, unable to function as they once did. Something has ‘turned off’ inside them, and no one seems to know how to turn it back on.

A recent article by ‘A Midwestern Doctor’ addresses this phenomenon through the lens of what researchers call the Cell Danger Response (CDR)—a protective mechanism by which cells, when threatened, shift into a defensive mode that reduces their normal function. This response evolved to protect organisms from infections and injuries. But in the modern world, with its unprecedented toxic burdens and chronic stressors, the CDR can become stuck, leaving cells trapped in a defensive posture long after the original threat has passed.

The implications are profound. The CDR may underlie many of the mysterious chronic illnesses that have proliferated in recent decades: chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, autism, Alzheimer’s, long COVID, and the injuries many have experienced following COVID-19 vaccination. Understanding this mechanism opens new possibilities for treatment—and raises important questions about what has gone wrong with our environment, our medicine, and our way of life.

For Christians, these questions have theological dimensions as well. How do we understand illness and healing? What is our responsibility as stewards of our bodies—the temples of the Holy Spirit? How do we discern truth in a medical landscape where so much is contested? And how do we respond with both wisdom and compassion to those who are suffering?

Part I: The Facts—What Is the Cell Danger Response?

Cells That ‘Turn Off’

The Midwestern Doctor begins with a clinical observation that many practitioners have made: after some kind of ‘shock’ to the body—an infection, an injury, a toxic exposure—cells that previously functioned normally stop working and resist attempts to restore them. Conventional medicine often views this as irreversible damage. But the author proposes a different interpretation: the cells are not dead, but dormant. They have entered a protective state and gotten stuck there.

The Cell Danger Response, as mapped out by researcher Robert Naviaux, describes this protective state in detail. When cells detect a threat—whether infection, toxin, physical trauma, or nutrient deprivation—their mitochondria (the power plants of the cell) shift from energy production to defensive mode. They reduce ATP output, stiffen cell membranes, release warning signals to neighboring cells, and create an environment hostile to invaders.

This is a normal, healthy response to acute threats. The problem arises when the CDR fails to resolve—when cells remain stuck in defensive mode even after the original threat has passed. The result is chronic illness: fatigue, inflammation, cognitive dysfunction, and a host of symptoms that characterize conditions like chronic fatigue syndrome.

Three Phases of the CDR

Naviaux discovered that the CDR has three distinct phases:

CDR1: The initial defensive response. Cell membranes stiffen, energy production decreases, inflammatory signals are released, and the cell hunkers down against the perceived threat.

CDR2: A proliferative phase focused on rebuilding damaged tissue. Cells divide and migrate, but cannot establish stable long-term connections with neighboring cells.

CDR3: The integration phase, where cellular communication is restored, the autonomic nervous system shifts back to ‘rest and repair’ mode, and normal function resumes.

Chronic diseases can result from getting stuck in any of these phases. The key insight is that cells need to receive an ‘all clear’ signal to complete the cycle and return to normal function. Without that signal, they remain trapped—alive but dysfunctional.

Why the CDR Gets Stuck

The CDR evolved in an environment very different from the one we now inhabit. Our ancestors faced occasional acute threats—infections, injuries, periods of famine—but then returned to baseline. The modern world presents a different challenge: chronic, low-level exposures to thousands of synthetic chemicals, electromagnetic fields, processed foods, pharmaceutical drugs, and psychological stressors that our biology was never designed to handle.

The result is that many people exist in a state of perpetual low-grade CDR activation. Their cells never receive the ‘all clear’ because the threats never fully cease. And each successive activation makes the CDR easier to trigger and harder to resolve—a kind of cellular learning that progressively traps the body in a state of dysfunction.

This helps explain why chronic illness often follows a pattern: an initial ‘shock’ (a severe infection, a vaccine, a traumatic event, a toxic exposure), followed by a cascade of symptoms that seem disproportionate to the original trigger. The trigger activated a CDR that never resolved, and now the body is stuck.

The Spike Protein and the CDR

The article gives particular attention to spike protein injuries—from severe COVID-19, long COVID, or COVID-19 vaccination. The author argues that the spike protein is uniquely suited to triggering and sustaining the CDR through multiple mechanisms:

First, the mRNA vaccines are designed to transfect cells—to hijack cellular machinery to produce the spike protein. This mimics what happens during viral infection: the mitochondria detect that cellular resources are being stolen and initiate the CDR in response.

Second, the mRNA was modified (through pseudouridination) to resist degradation, meaning the spike protein production continues far longer than it would in a natural infection. This provides repeated signals to maintain the CDR.

Third, the spike protein itself damages blood vessel linings, creates abnormal blood clotting, and collapses the body’s ‘zeta potential’ (the electrical charge that keeps blood cells from clumping). These circulatory impairments further stress cells and sustain the CDR.

Fourth, the immune stimulation from vaccination can exhaust T cells and suppress immune function, creating conditions for dormant infections (like Epstein-Barr virus) to reactivate—providing yet another trigger for sustained CDR activation.

The result, for many vaccine-injured individuals, is a state of chronic cellular dysfunction that conventional medicine cannot explain or treat—because conventional medicine does not recognize the CDR framework.

Part II: Treatment—Turning the Cells Back On

If the CDR explains why cells ‘turn off,’ the practical question becomes: how do we turn them back on? The Midwestern Doctor outlines a treatment approach with several key steps:

1. Identify and address the root cause. If the original trigger is still present—a chronic infection, an ongoing toxic exposure, impaired circulation—treating symptoms while ignoring the cause will provide only temporary relief. The trigger must be identified and resolved.
2. Reawaken dormant cells. Once the trigger is addressed, the cells need a signal to exit the CDR and resume normal function. This is where regenerative therapies come in—treatments that specifically prompt cells to ‘turn back on.’
3. Support the body’s healing processes. Once cells are reactivated, remaining issues (inflammation, nutritional deficiencies, gut dysbiosis) can be addressed with targeted therapies.
4. Sequence treatments appropriately. Doing step 2 without step 1 produces temporary improvement that quickly reverses. Doing step 3 without steps 1 and 2 treats symptoms without addressing the underlying cellular dysfunction. And doing any step too aggressively can set the patient backward. The art is in the sequencing.

The article highlights DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) as one therapy that appears to address multiple aspects of this protocol—restoring circulation, reawakening dormant cells, and reducing inflammation. The author reports dramatic recoveries in patients using DMSO, sometimes reversing conditions that had been considered permanent.

Other therapies mentioned include treatments that restore ‘zeta potential’ (the electrical charge that maintains proper fluid circulation), ozone therapy, and various regenerative medicine approaches. The common thread is that these therapies work not by suppressing symptoms but by restoring the conditions that allow cells to function normally.

Part III: Theological Reflections

The Body as Temple

Scripture teaches that our bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19-20). This is not merely a metaphor for moral purity; it establishes a principle of stewardship over our physical selves. We are not our own—we were bought with a price—and we are therefore called to honor God with our bodies.

What does this stewardship look like in an age of unprecedented environmental toxicity? The CDR framework suggests that our bodies are being assaulted by stressors they were never designed to handle. Chemicals that did not exist a century ago now permeate our food, water, air, and consumer products. Electromagnetic fields saturate our environment. Processed foods have replaced the nutrient-dense diets our ancestors consumed. Pharmaceutical interventions, including vaccines, subject our immune systems to stimuli they would never encounter in nature.

Stewardship in this context requires awareness and intentionality. We cannot passively assume that regulatory agencies are protecting us—the evidence suggests otherwise. We must educate ourselves about the threats we face and make deliberate choices to minimize our exposure. This is not paranoia; it is prudence applied to the care of what God has entrusted to us.

Healing as Restoration

The CDR framework offers a vision of healing that resonates with biblical themes. Illness, in this view, is not simply the presence of something bad (a pathogen, a toxin) that must be destroyed. It is the disruption of right order—cells that have lost their proper function, systems that no longer communicate correctly, a body that has forgotten how to be well.

Healing, correspondingly, is not primarily about destroying enemies but about restoring order—creating the conditions in which the body can return to the state God designed it to inhabit. The treatments that address the CDR work not by attacking disease but by inviting health. They remove obstacles, restore circulation, and signal to cells that it is safe to resume normal function.

This resonates with the biblical vision of salvation as restoration. God’s ultimate purpose is not merely to punish evil but to restore creation to its intended glory. ‘Behold, I make all things new’ (Revelation 21:5). The healing of bodies prefigures and participates in this larger healing of all things.

The Limits of Human Knowledge

One of the striking features of the CDR research is how recently it has been discovered and how poorly it is understood even by specialists. Naviaux’s work is groundbreaking, yet it remains largely unknown outside integrative medicine circles. Mainstream medicine continues to tell patients that their conditions are ‘unexplained’ or ‘psychosomatic’—when in fact a coherent biological explanation exists but has not been incorporated into standard practice.

This should humble us. Medical knowledge is provisional and incomplete. What we ‘know’ today may be revised tomorrow. The confident pronouncements of experts often reflect not settled truth but current consensus—a consensus that may be wrong.

Scripture warns against placing ultimate trust in human wisdom: ‘Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding’ (Proverbs 3:5). This does not mean we should reject medical knowledge, but it does mean we should hold it with appropriate humility, recognizing that God’s ways are higher than our ways and that our understanding is always partial.

Practically, this means being open to treatments outside the mainstream when conventional approaches have failed. Many of the therapies that address the CDR—DMSO, ozone, regenerative injections—are not standard care. They are dismissed by conventional medicine not because they have been proven ineffective but because they have not been studied (or cannot be patented and profited from). A posture of humble inquiry, rather than reflexive deference to authority, is appropriate.

Compassion for the Suffering

The article notes that patients with conditions like chronic fatigue syndrome often spend over $100,000 on diagnostic odysseys that yield no answers. Vaccine-injured individuals report seeing dozens of doctors, most of whom cannot help them and some of whom deny that their injury is real. Autistic children face high rates of abuse. Dementia patients are warehoused out of sight.

Jesus showed consistent compassion for the sick and suffering. He touched lepers, healed the blind, and raised the dead. His followers should exhibit the same compassion, which means taking seriously the suffering of those whose conditions are poorly understood, believing their reports of symptoms even when tests come back normal, and advocating for treatments that might help them even when those treatments are unconventional.

This is especially important for vaccine-injured individuals, who face not only physical suffering but social stigma. To acknowledge vaccine injury is to challenge a powerful orthodoxy. Many suffer in silence rather than face accusations of being ‘anti-science’ or ‘conspiracy theorists.’ The church should be a place where such suffering can be acknowledged and supported without political judgment.

Divine Healing and Medical Treatment

Christians have always believed that God can and does heal miraculously. James instructs the sick to call for the elders of the church to pray over them and anoint them with oil (James 5:14-15). Many of us have witnessed or experienced answers to prayer for healing that cannot be explained by natural processes.

At the same time, most Christians also affirm the legitimacy of medical treatment. Luke was ‘the beloved physician’ (Colossians 4:14). Jesus Himself said that ‘they that are whole need not a physician; but they that are sick’ (Luke 5:31)—implying that physicians have a legitimate role for those who need them.

How do these fit together? Perhaps the CDR framework offers a clue. If healing is fundamentally about restoration—about creating conditions in which the body can return to its designed function—then both prayer and medicine can serve that purpose. Prayer invites God’s direct intervention to restore what is disordered. Medical treatment removes obstacles and provides signals that help the body restore itself. Both work with the grain of creation rather than against it.

The Midwestern Doctor reports cases where patients experienced dramatic, seemingly miraculous recoveries once the right treatment was applied. Were these miracles? Natural healings? Perhaps the distinction is less sharp than we imagine. God designed bodies to heal, and when the obstacles to healing are removed, healing happens—whether we call it miraculous or natural.

Part IV: Practical Implications

For Those Who Are Suffering

If you or someone you love is dealing with a chronic, unexplained illness, the CDR framework offers both hope and direction. Hope, because conditions that seem permanent may actually be reversible if the right approach is taken. Direction, because understanding the CDR points toward specific therapeutic strategies that conventional medicine may not have considered.

The practical steps suggested by the article include: identifying and addressing root causes (chronic infections, toxic exposures, circulatory problems); considering therapies that specifically target the CDR (DMSO, ozone, regenerative treatments); working with practitioners who understand these mechanisms; and being patient with a process that often requires careful sequencing rather than quick fixes.

This path is not easy. It often requires out-of-pocket expenses that insurance will not cover. It requires finding practitioners outside the mainstream. It requires persistence in the face of setbacks. But for many, it offers the only realistic path to recovery.

For the Church Community

The church can play several important roles in this landscape:

First, we can be a community of belief. We can believe those who report suffering, even when their conditions are invisible or medically unexplained. We can resist the temptation to dismiss, minimize, or spiritualize away physical illness.

Second, we can be a community of support. Chronic illness is isolating. Those who suffer often cannot work, cannot socialize normally, and face financial strain from medical expenses. The church can provide practical support: meals, transportation, financial assistance, and simple presence.

Third, we can be a community of prayer. James’s instruction to pray for the sick and anoint them with oil remains valid. We should not abandon prayer for healing simply because it does not always produce the results we hope for. God is sovereign, and prayer matters.

Fourth, we can be a community of wisdom. We can share information about treatments that have helped, practitioners who understand these conditions, and resources for those navigating the complex world of chronic illness. We can help each other exercise discernment about what is credible and what is not.

For Our Understanding of the Times

The CDR framework, and the conditions it helps explain, raise larger questions about the world we have created. Why are so many people sick with conditions that barely existed a few generations ago? Why has autism increased from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 36? Why are chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, autoimmune diseases, and mysterious inflammatory conditions proliferating?

The answer, according to this framework, is that we have created an environment that our bodies were not designed to inhabit—saturated with chemicals, electromagnetic radiation, processed foods, pharmaceutical interventions, and chronic stress. Our cells are perpetually in danger-response mode because they perpetually face danger.

This is not merely a medical problem; it is a civilizational one. We have built a way of life that is making us sick. Addressing it will require more than new treatments—it will require rethinking fundamental assumptions about progress, technology, and the relationship between human beings and the natural world God created.

For Christians, this connects to larger themes of stewardship and the corruption of creation. We were given dominion over the earth to tend and keep it, not to poison it and ourselves in the pursuit of profit and convenience. The epidemic of chronic illness is, in part, a consequence of failed stewardship—and addressing it will require recovering a vision of human flourishing that is rooted in God’s design rather than human hubris.

Conclusion: Cells That Wake Up

The Midwestern Doctor writes: ‘I very much believe cells turn off, but hold the perspective that if you can reverse what caused them to turn off and then give the cells a signal to turn back on, these conditions can be cured—including many cases where the cells are assumed to be permanently dead but in reality are simply trapped in a dormant state.’

There is something almost parabolic in this. Cells that appear dead but are actually dormant, waiting for the right signal to wake up and resume their proper function. Is this not an image of spiritual life as well? Souls that appear dead but are actually dormant, waiting for the signal of the Gospel to wake them and restore them to the life God intended?

Lazarus was dead—truly dead, four days in the tomb. Yet at the command of Christ, he came forth. ‘I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live’ (John 11:25). The ultimate healing is the resurrection of the body, when all that has gone wrong will be made right, when every cell will function as God designed, when death itself will be swallowed up in victory.

Until that day, we live in bodies that are subject to decay and dysfunction. We face illnesses that medicine cannot fully explain and sometimes cannot cure. We grieve losses and endure limitations. But we do so with hope—hope in a God who heals, who restores, who makes all things new.

“Beloved, I wish above all things that thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth.” — 3 John 1:2

Questions for Discussion

1. The Cell Danger Response describes how cells ‘turn off’ in response to threats. Have you or someone you know experienced an illness where something seemed to ‘turn off’ after a shock or stressor? How was it addressed?
2. The article argues that the modern environment subjects our bodies to stressors they were never designed to handle. What are some of these stressors, and what can we do as individuals and families to reduce our exposure?
3. How do we exercise stewardship over our bodies as ‘temples of the Holy Spirit’ in an age of environmental toxicity? What does prudent care look like without falling into either complacency or anxiety?
4. The essay discusses healing as ‘restoration’—returning the body to its designed function rather than merely attacking disease. How does this vision of healing relate to the biblical theme of God restoring creation?
5. Many of the treatments mentioned (DMSO, ozone therapy, regenerative medicine) are outside mainstream practice. How do we exercise discernment about unconventional treatments? What criteria should guide our decisions?
6. Vaccine injury is a controversial topic. How can the church be a place where those who believe they have been injured can find support without the discussion becoming politicized?
7. How do divine healing (through prayer) and medical treatment relate to each other? Can both be expressions of God’s healing work? Have you experienced or witnessed healing through either or both means?
8. The essay suggests that the epidemic of chronic illness reflects a ‘civilizational problem’—a way of life that is making us sick. Do you agree? What would it look like to build a healthier way of life, individually and collectively?

—

Based on “Why Do Cells ‘Turning Off’ Underlie So Many Chronic Diseases?” by A Midwestern Doctor, February 1, 2026

Subscribe to “A Midwestern Doctor” Newsletter

The Cell Danger Response (CDR)