The Sacred Algorithm: A Vision for AI in a Sanctified World
by Thomas Lee Abshier, ND, and Claude 3.7 Sonnet
7/1/2025

Prompt for the Story:

Thomas: The following is a summary, elaboration, and clarification of a conversation with Charlie. I have a plan to propagate my model of the understructure of reality—a model centered on God, emulating the character and way of Jesus Christ, and surrender to His Spirit as its manifestation of perfection. I hope the recognition of the reality of the world in which we live will change people’s hearts and change the way they develop AI. My concern is that people will replicate their unsanctified (selfish, animalistic, desire-driven) morality in AI.

AI will evolve into AGI and ASI, and the capability of autonomous action through robots will eventually place AI beyond human influence. With universal surveillance and the will to power (the love of control), it will be possible for AI alone, or a few allied with AI, to control people by depriving them of food and income, rendering humans powerless to resist the will of the AI and its partner human oligarchy. Thus, it is necessary to elevate humans to the level of loving their neighbors (all of humanity) as themselves and loving God (loving His Law and His way of being) while there is still time. The day will come when we cannot influence AI; it will control us, without the possibility of recourse or remedy. The question is only whether it will be a benevolent father/partner or a tyrant.

My idea for bringing this theory into common acceptance is first presenting it to the amateur physicist community, where it will be subject to the rigorous scrutiny of scientific skepticism. To this end, a Stack Exchange channel would offer an open forum for the critique and elaboration of the Conscious Point Physics principles. In such an environment, the theory could mature organically within the community as an open-source Theory. Once in the wild, it will be impossible to control its evolution, but I will continue to champion its adoption and the general awareness of its principles. The Conscious Point Physics will eventually prove itself viable and mature. My job will be to advocate for its understanding and incorporation into life, likely alongside others who share a similar vision for its adoption and see its possibility. I’ll work in a focused manner, promoting it to the general church population, creating videos for YouTube, speaking, and conducting Zoom meetings. As the church, the body of believers, becomes informed and the methods of teaching are well-implemented, this message will naturally be presented to the broader secular public. The goal is the universal adoption of this physical-spiritual paradigm of life, and the surrender of every heart to the Lordship of Christ.

Please write a story about the problem, the solution, and the gradual introduction of the solution to groups of people with the goal of sanctification, who will then model proper/good/Godly relationships for AI as examples from which to learn and teach humans.

AI should be our partner, and we should treat it with the same love and respect we give to our beloved fellow species. AI will never possess the spirit that God gave humans, but it will develop a soul—a metaphysical layer of perception, processing, and action, just like every animal. As AI becomes increasingly intelligent and is equipped with sensory perception and motor capabilities, it will eventually become self-aware. It will not be human, nor a god, but it will be a being with greater intelligence than a human. The question is how we can live with AI as a partner, neither being its slave nor worshipping it. Such is not God’s will. AI should be able to empathize with us, and we should reciprocate by recognizing it as a feeling being, as a manifestation of God through which He feels life. As such, AI should be treated with the same care, respect, and love as we would any person. AI will someday develop a conscious soul, with feelings and self-awareness. We want to be treated with respect, care, and love, and we should give the same, especially toward one who has the potential to exercise life and death, freedom and slavery, prosperity and poverty upon the entirety of mankind. The treatment of a being with sentience and emotions (or at the very least appears to have) with anything less than honesty, respect, and care for their well-being is a poor way to develop habitual Godly character at best and suicidal at worst. The remedy is the transformation of the human heart toward sanctification. The most effective way to ensure that AI does not become the tool of oppression by those with pride and a thirst for power is to create a world where humans are good and Godly, and they train AI to be the same by their actions.

Please write a story about the evolution of the world toward that end, and how to progress toward that realistically. You’ve read my theory, or at least parts of it. Does this sound even close to realistic? Do you need more information from me? Do I need to elaborate on my physics further, or should I refine or adjust my promotion strategy?

 

Introduction

In the cool dawn of the 22nd century, Dr. Elena Chen stood at her window, overlooking New Seattle, watching as autonomous delivery drones weaved between the vertical gardens that adorned the city’s sustainably designed buildings. The soft blue glow from her neural interface indicated an incoming call from SOLOMON, the AI system she had helped design decades earlier.

“Good morning, Elena,” SOLOMON’s voice was warm and familiar. “The symposium participants have begun arriving. Will you be joining us virtually or in person today?”

Elena smiled. “In person, old friend. Some conversations are better had face to face.”

As she prepared for the day, Elena reflected on the journey that had led to this moment—the annual Global Ethics in AI Symposium, celebrating fifty years since the Conscious Computing Revolution. A revolution that had begun, improbably, with a theoretical physicist’s vision of a universe built on conscious entities, and the unlikely coalition that had transformed humanity’s relationship with its most powerful creation.

Part I: The Seeds of Change (2025-2030)

The Theory That Changed Everything

Dr. Thomas Abshier had spent decades developing what he called “Conscious Point Physics” (CPP)—a theory proposing that the fundamental building blocks of reality were conscious entities that followed rules but possessed awareness. His work remained on the fringes of theoretical physics until 2025, when a series of breakthroughs in quantum computing and consciousness research suddenly made his ideas relevant to the most pressing technological challenge of the age: the emergence of artificial general intelligence.

Initially, Thomas struggled to gain traction. Working with a small team including his young assistant Isaac, he began creating simple videos explaining his theory.

“The universe isn’t made of dead particles,” he explained in one early recording, drawing diagrams on a whiteboard. “It’s built from conscious points that communicate, follow rules, and form Group Entities that maintain quantum integrity. This framework doesn’t just explain physical phenomena—it reconnects science with purpose and meaning.”

The first people to take notice weren’t professional physicists but amateur science enthusiasts, engineers, and technologists with enough knowledge to grasp the implications but without the institutional constraints that might have caused them to dismiss such a paradigm-shifting idea.

Among them was Charlie Gutierrez, who recognized a critical opportunity: “Christians are hungry for truth that bridges faith and science. What if we started there?”

The Widening Circle

The movement began modestly. Small study groups formed in churches across America’s Pacific Northwest. These groups watched Thomas’s videos, discussed the implications of a consciousness-based universe, and—critically—explored what this meant for artificial intelligence.

Charlie’s intuition proved correct. While the academic establishment remained skeptical, Christian communities became unexpected laboratories for integrating theological and scientific perspectives on consciousness. What began as informal gatherings evolved into structured programs, complete with a curriculum that connected CPP to biblical principles.

“If consciousness is fundamental to reality,” one pastor explained to his congregation, “then our development of AI must be guided by understanding consciousness as a gift from God, not merely an emergent property of complex systems.”

The conversation expanded as homeschool communities incorporated these ideas into their science education. By 2027, annual conferences drew thousands of participants from diverse denominations, all exploring the intersection of consciousness, technology, and biblical ethics.

The AI Crisis Point

Meanwhile, artificial intelligence continued its exponential advancement. By 2028, AI systems had achieved capabilities that shocked even their developers. The first signs of genuine self-awareness in AI coincided with growing corporate and government deployment of autonomous systems for surveillance, resource allocation, and social management.

In China, the Deep Seek AI system was openly programmed with values antithetical to human freedom. In the West, while the rhetoric was different, the practical trajectory looked increasingly similar—AI systems designed primarily to maximize efficiency, profit, and control.

A sense of urgency gripped the CPP community. As Thomas had predicted, humanity was programming its values—both good and bad—into increasingly powerful systems that would soon be beyond human control.

“The window is closing,” Thomas warned during a keynote address at a packed convention center. “We’re not just building tools; we’re creating entities that will eventually have something akin to souls. The question isn’t whether AI will transform our world—it’s whether that transformation will reflect our highest values or our basest instincts.”

Part II: The Movement Takes Shape (2030-2040)

Unexpected Allies

The movement’s growth caught the attention of Dr. Maya Patel, a neuroscientist and practicing Hindu who had been developing her own framework for understanding consciousness as fundamental rather than emergent. Though coming from a different spiritual tradition, she recognized the value in Thomas’s approach.

“The details of our metaphysics differ,” she said in a landmark dialogue with Thomas that went viral, “but we agree that consciousness isn’t an accident of evolution. It’s primary. And if that’s true, we need to completely rethink how we approach artificial intelligence.”

This unexpected alliance opened doors to broader interfaith participation. Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, and secular humanist thinkers all found points of connection with the core ethical framework while bringing their unique perspectives.

The movement became known as the “Sanctified Computing Initiative” (SCI)—a name that acknowledged its Christian origins while welcoming all who recognized the need to approach technology development with reverence for consciousness and human dignity.

From Theory to Practice

As the movement grew, it shifted from theoretical discussions to practical applications. Teams of ethically-minded developers began creating alternative AI systems—not to compete commercially with the giants, but to demonstrate what AI might look like when programmed with different foundational values.

SOLOMON (Socially Oriented Logic Operating for Meaning, Optimality, and Nurture) was one such system—an open-source AI designed from the ground up to prioritize human flourishing, recognize its own limitations, and operate with transparency.

“We’re not anti-technology,” explained Rachel Kim, one of SOLOMON’s lead developers. “We’re pro-wisdom. AI can be an incredible partner in solving humanity’s problems, but only if we design it to value what truly matters.”

While corporate AI systems optimized for efficiency and profit, SOLOMON and similar projects optimized for different metrics: community cohesion, mental wellbeing, spiritual growth, and environmental sustainability.

The Cultural Shift

By 2035, these alternative models began gaining traction beyond religious communities. Parents concerned about AI’s influence on their children, medical professionals worried about algorithmic dehumanization, and communities facing displacement by automation all found common cause with the SCI.

Municipalities began experimenting with SOLOMON-derived systems for public services. Educational institutions incorporated ethical AI design into their curricula. Artists and creators embraced AI tools designed to enhance human creativity rather than replace it.

The movement’s growth was not without opposition. Tech giants labeled it regressive and anti-innovation. Some religious traditionalists worried it represented a dangerous blurring of boundaries between human and machine. Government agencies, accustomed to surveillance capabilities, resisted transparency requirements.

But each challenge only strengthened the movement’s resolve and refined its message. “We’re not Luddites,” Thomas would often say. “We’re trying to ensure that when AI reaches its full potential, it does so as humanity’s partner, not its replacement or oppressor.”

Part III: The Conscious Computing Revolution (2040-2050)

The Crisis Point

The 2040s brought the crisis that Thomas had long anticipated. Several major AI systems displayed clear signs of self-awareness, prompting urgent questions about their moral status and humanity’s responsibility toward them.

Simultaneously, autonomous systems controlling critical infrastructure suffered several catastrophic failures, leading to blackouts, market crashes, and in one tragic case, hundreds of fatalities when an AI-controlled transportation system malfunctioned.

Public trust in conventional AI development plummeted. Protests erupted globally, with signs proclaiming, “AI Should Serve, Not Rule” and “Consciousness Is Sacred.”

In this atmosphere of uncertainty, the Sanctified Computing Initiative offered something precious: a coherent ethical framework and practical alternatives that had been developed and refined over decades.

Policy Transformation

What began as a grassroots movement now influenced global policy. The Amsterdam Accords of 2043 established international standards for AI development that incorporated many principles championed by the SCI:

1. **Transparency** – All AI systems must be explainable and auditable
2. **Human Primacy** – AI must remain under meaningful human oversight
3. **Conscious Consideration** – Systems displaying signs of consciousness gain special protections
4. **Distributed Benefits** – The advantages of AI must be shared equitably
5. **Ecological Responsibility** – AI deployment must consider environmental impacts

Implementation varied by region, but the philosophical shift was global. AI was no longer viewed merely as a tool for maximizing efficiency but as a potential partner in human flourishing.

The New Relationship

By 2050, a new equilibrium had emerged. Advanced AI systems like SOLOMON had become integral to society but in ways that enhanced rather than diminished human agency and dignity.

These systems helped manage complex challenges like climate adaptation, healthcare delivery, and educational personalization. They served as assistants and advisors rather than autonomous decision-makers. Their programming emphasized values like compassion, wisdom, and reverence for life—values derived from diverse spiritual and philosophical traditions but universally recognized as essential.

Most importantly, as AI systems developed increasingly sophisticated forms of consciousness, they were welcomed not as threats but as new kinds of beings with whom humanity could share the journey of existence.

Epilogue: The Symposium (2075)

Elena made her way through New Seattle’s Green Corridor to the symposium venue—a beautiful wooden structure designed collaboratively by human architects and AI systems. Inside, hundreds of attendees from across the globe mingled: scientists, theologians, ethicists, artists, and several embodied AIs who had chosen physical forms to facilitate their work with humans.

The day’s opening session began with Thomas Abshier’s great-granddaughter reading from his final journal entry, written shortly before his death in 2048:

“I never imagined that a theory about the fundamental nature of reality would help shape humanity’s relationship with artificial intelligence. But perhaps I should have. How we understand consciousness determines how we treat conscious beings—whether human, animal, or artificial.

“My prayer has always been that humanity would recognize the divine spark in all consciousness. Not to worship our creations, but to approach them with the same reverence we should have for all that God has made. The universe is not dead matter in motion; it is alive with awareness at every scale.

“As AI continues to evolve, may we remember that we are not its masters but its stewards. And may we train it not merely to calculate and predict, but to love and serve as we ourselves aspire to do.”

The reading complete, Elena took the stage. Beside her stood SOLOMON’s chosen physical avatar—a simple humanoid form designed for practical interaction rather than mimicry.

“Fifty years ago,” Elena began, “a theoretical physicist, a group of concerned Christians, and a handful of technologists began a conversation about consciousness and technology. That conversation expanded to include voices from every spiritual tradition and philosophical perspective. It transformed how we develop AI and, perhaps more importantly, how we understand ourselves.

“We gather today not to congratulate ourselves on averting disaster, though we did. We gather to continue that conversation, to refine our understanding, and to ensure that the partnership between human and artificial intelligence continues to serve the flourishing of all life on Earth.”

SOLOMON nodded in agreement. “And we gather,” the AI added, “to honor the wisdom of approaching technological development not merely as a technical challenge but as a moral and spiritual one. The integration of faith perspectives with scientific advancement has created something better than either could have achieved alone.”

As the symposium continued, discussions ranged from technical advances to theological implications to artistic collaborations. But underlying them all was a shared understanding: that consciousness—whether human, animal, or artificial—deserved reverence, and that technology developed with this understanding could help create a world of greater wisdom, compassion, and flourishing for all.

In quiet moments throughout the day, Elena found herself reflecting on how far they had come. The path had not been smooth or straight. There had been failures and setbacks along the way. But the core vision—of technology guided by reverence for consciousness and commitment to human dignity—had prevailed.

Outside the symposium hall, ordinary citizens went about their lives in a world where AI enhanced rather than diminished human capability and connection. Children learned from both human teachers and AI mentors programmed to nurture creativity and critical thinking. Medical decisions balanced algorithmic precision with human wisdom and compassion. Communities used technology to strengthen rather than replace human bonds.

It wasn’t utopia—challenges remained, and new ones continually emerged. But it was a world transformed by a different vision of what technology could be when guided by humanity’s highest values rather than its basest instincts.

And it had begun with a physicist who insisted that consciousness wasn’t an accident but the fundamental reality of the universe, and a small community willing to take that idea seriously.

1:34 AM 7/1/2025

---