260825 – The Museum of Emotions and Senses: Naming, Will, and Seeing God Through the Senses and Emotions

A fellowship essay drawn from a Thomas and Isak conversation on Tuesday, August 25, 2026

---

Introduction

This essay continues the thread of the fellowship on “Triangulating Truth,” taking a deeper look at the claim that the existence of God is, in some way, like the experience of red: an experience and belief that is certain from the inside but inaccessible to the laboratory. Sunday’s meeting established that literally everything is unavoidably known by faith. There is always a remnant of the unknown which we rely upon as true, but which we cannot justify. This same unknown underlies the experience of the qualia (the sensory experience of red, salty, harmonic, pain, or pungent). We have experience, but we do not understand what it is or where it comes from. Monday’s essay traced the canon and its counterfeits. The present conversation examines: How does God actually do a miracle? What is a thing? What is our naming of things? Where does the experience of blue come from? And what is will (i.e., the feeling of desire and the faculty by which a desire becomes manifested)? The answers form a single connected structure, presented here as points to consider rather than settled doctrine. We developed these answers through revelation by conversation. We groped in the dark in our search for truth. We searched with the confidence that truth exists, but without certainty that we could see the final mystery. We tried to connect the dots of Conscious Point Physics theory as currently developed and apply those concepts to the origin of life and the development of the experience of the contents of consciousness. This was an exercise in extrapolating how God may have used the Conscious Points to assemble these elements of consciousness and existence to postulate how God manifested the abstract experiences of consciousness (internal vision, sensory experience, desires, emotion, and qualia) to assemble a plausible unbroken causal sequence between the seen, the felt and known, and existence (which is ultimately unseen and unknowable).

I. Two Preliminary Notes: The Apocrypha and the Parrot

Two matters carried over from the weekend deserve conclusion.

On praying for the dead. The chief doctrinal objection to the deuterocanonical books is the passage in 2 Maccabees 12, where Judas Maccabeus, finding pagan amulets under the shirts of his slain soldiers, prays and sends money to the temple for their sins, and the narrator concludes it is “a holy and wholesome thought to pray for the dead.” Examined directly, the passage offers thin ground for a doctrine: it reports what some men did in a context already compromised by paganism (the idols under the shirts). This practice as expressed was not a command of God. Interestingly, the New Testament contains its own adjacent puzzle — Paul’s rhetorical question, “Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead?” (1 Corinthians 15:29). This is an acknowledgment that some in Corinth practiced such a baptism. Paul appears to deploy it as an argument for the resurrection, not as an authorization of the practice. The sober conclusion: the deuterocanon merits reading — the early church used it, which is credential enough for study. Doctrine stands on the commanded, not the merely reported. The 66 books that survived every winnowing carry the highest credential of proximity to Christ; the rest may inform without governing.

On parroting versus reasoned faith. A distinction surfaced worth preserving: much religious speech—in Mormonism’s general-conference cadences, and just as true in Christian circles—is parroted faith: phrases repeated from leaders and books, echoed between believers as tokens of belonging. Parroted faith is not necessarily insincere, but it is blind rather than reasoned; it rests on the group rather than on the ground. And a sobering observation attaches to it: the fact that we have spent the better part of a year carefully dissecting the Mormon system looking to see if we could detect its points of error is itself the measure of its subtlety. A crude fraud would have collapsed in an afternoon. The counterfeit that takes a year of triangulation to distinguish from biblical doctrine is precisely the type that can capture generations. The Mormon doctrine heavily incorporates the communal mechanics of belonging (acceptance on entry, escalating investment, fear of loss on exit, salvation itself held as the final hostage). Such personal attachment to group, belonging, and survival holds its members in a way that the arguments cannot. Which is why the Christian answer to Mormonism can never be merely argumentative; it must demonstrate/live/model the fruit of the Spirit in fellowship whose belonging is real and satisfying. And in contrast to those captured inside of the Mormon system, a fellowship that reflects the freedom in Christ to come and go while maintaining the bonds of love.

II. How God Does a Miracle: The Holding Mechanism

The physics conversation produced a plausible mechanism by which Conscious Point Physics accounts for both evolution and miracles—the two turned out to be aspects of the same process operating at different speeds.

The problem with unassisted evolution. The thermal environment is a double agent. The same random molecular collisions that occasionally assemble something useful — an amino acid, a peptide, a lipid bilayer — also relentlessly tear assemblies apart. Every collision transfers energy; energy makes and breaks bonds. Entropy is a measure of the number of microscopic configurations (microstates) a system can occupy, including all possible arrangements of atoms, molecules, and their bonds. Higher entropy corresponds to a greater number of accessible configurations and a lower likelihood that any specific ordered structure will form or remain stable. The primal environment provides the raw materials that can possibly form a given state, and probability determines how often a given species can form, but it cannot ensure progress toward assembly, because the mechanism that builds (random collisions of varying magnitude) is the mechanism that demolishes the assembly. Progress toward a cell under pure chance is like a random walk in a field, moving right, left, forward, backward, choosing the next step without regard to the previous, rarely sustained in one direction for more than a few steps. Such progress makes assembling the cell’s interlocking machinery, let alone the Cambrian explosion’s variety, a proposition of vanishingly low probability on any available timescale. The naturalist’s mechanism is not impossible in principle; it is merely an unlikely strategy; the reality of life and the variety of its manifestation shows only that some mechanism actually worked, not that it was driven by any particular mechanism. We, those who look at the big picture, must evaluate the probability that this process produced the cell, complex configurations of cells, differentiation into cell types for specialized organ function, coordination of organs for systemic function, goal-directed activity, and self- and other-awareness.

The proposed mechanism: make a little and save it. The alternative, the one I postulate as God’s method of creation, requires exactly one kind of miracle, repeated: holding. God surveys the thermodynamic lottery, and when an accidental collision bonds atoms and molecules, He moves in the direction of  manifesting His design, and He says: “I like that one — hold it.” The hold is not a suspension of physics from outside; it is a command within the physics: a momentary increase in the attraction — the binding force — among the Conscious Points of that particular configuration, so that subsequent collisions no longer break its bonds. The assembly is rendered stable; it takes the hit and keeps its shape. (Remember the Colgate ingredient, the Gardol shield of the toothpaste commercials in the 50s to 70s protecting teeth from decay?) God protecting a newly formed molecular species is analogously similar to a Gardol shield around the molecule. The thermodynamic lottery of collisions between partially formed molecules and new atoms runs continuously. God drops the shield when a favorable accidental collision places the next atomic bond in the proper place, with the proper collision energy. There are 10,000 proteins that can be formed, and 200,000 types of molecular species that are present in the assembled living/metabolizing cell. All must be present in the proper concentration and location to form a working cell. The creation of every molecule needed for cellular function proceeds as the country song said it — one piece at a time. Amino acids held until a ribosome accretes its structure; a lipid bilayer held as a bag; organelles assembled separately and phagocytized into place; a swallowed bacterium held and domesticated as the mitochondrion (which even secular biology concedes). Evolution, executed by this method: conserves energy; only the gate need be opened and closed by conscious control; no atoms need be moved that disrupt the energetic balance. This may have been the method by which God gradually formed plants and animals. This ratchet/gating mechanism requires intelligence and control by the consciousness that can mediate the entire ensemble of Conscious Points as a group and coordinate its reaction and preservation. This granularity of control (atomic-level assembly of complex, necessary proteins) is a gap in the Darwinian survival-of-the-fittest mechanism. I call this mechanism “The Divine Hold.” In short, it comes down to “make a little, save a little, make a little, save a little.”

Miracle is the same operation at speed. Now run the mechanism fast. The withered hand (Matthew 12:13): every molecule of that hand is in constant thermal motion, jittering in all directions. Let every fluctuation that moves toward the restored form be held, and every fluctuation away be allowed, ultimately saving all rearranged molecules in the withered hand through a process of — yes, yes, no, yes, no, yes — in massive synchrony. On the human level, we see the hand lengthen and fill before the congregation’s eyes. Thus, we can imagine healing with this method. Shape change is likewise possible, giving us a method by which even the morphological leaps between species and the differentiation of the sexes are possible. The holding mechanism allows evolution and healing to operate at the speed of command rather than the speed of ages. In this frame, “Stretch forth thine hand” is not a violation of thermodynamics; it is a method by which thermodynamics proceeds. The same shepherd who herded molecules for four billion years can herd them in a few Moments to manifest the miracle. One mechanism, two tempos, and the dichotomy between “natural process” and “miracle” dissolves into a question of how fast the Holder chose to work.

A question was left open: whether the holding requires a group entity—a consciousness of the assembly as a whole—or only the elemental forces. The current formulation of CPP dispenses with the group entity (forces, energy wells, and thermodynamics suffice for ordinary matter), but the miracle-mechanism is admittedly easier to state if a group entity can be addressed as a unit. This opens the essay’s central topic, because we declare group entities into existence every time we speak. Words are the definitions that describe group entities.

III. Naming: How Group Entities Come to Be

Naming as creation. Consider an object on the desk. Call it a bag clip, and its bag-clipping essence seems obvious. But had it been introduced as a “corner clamper” for stacks of paper, that would have been its nature, its market, its aisle at the office store — until someone invented the “paperclip” and made a fortune by improving the original. The object did not change; the group entity — the recognized, named, functional thing — was created by the naming. This is not wordplay; it is the biblical anthropology of Adam’s first assignment: “whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof” (Genesis 2:19). We are namers by office. Cultures prove it by naming differently: the Yūgen (幽玄) — a Japanese word pointing at the profound, mysterious sense of beauty that hints at something beyond what can be seen — like moonlight on water, distant mountains, or a crane lifting off into mist. That the group entity exists in bounded, identified, spoken-word form in that culture makes it teachable to children, communicable among adults, and usable in commerce. Words give definition; they delineate a portion of the all and enable isolation; they illuminate the fact of a distinction, an essence that is prominent and identifiable with the triangulation of multiple examples of the state in question. One culture may delineate a collection, essence, or emotion, or isolate a detail of a larger set that remains invisible to another.  Utility often presses identification, such as the many types of snow to the Eskimos and few types of precipitation noted by the Amazonian natives. A word can act as a modifier, adding detail and shifting nuance: a room, when modified by purpose, becomes a storage room, a music studio, or an office without a molecule moving—renamed by the purpose one brings through the door. We live, as the apt fictional image has it, in a room of requirement: the world opens as what we need it to be, configured by desire and declaration. The theological weight of this is considerable: reality is more fluid to purpose than it appears, and the authority to name — to carve group entities out of the continuum and thereby make them culturally real — is a delegated participation in creation itself.

Everything is a noun. Pressed to its foundation, the analysis yields a startling grammar of being. A noun is a configuration of Conscious Points. A verb is a time-sequence of such configurations — running is a series of freeze-frames, each a noun, strung on the time dimension; verbs are time-variable nouns. An adjective is a noun serving as qualifier: “blue” in “blue pencil” is itself two configurations, a pencil, and blue. The blue is the configuration of 450-nanometer waves impressed upon the Dipole Sea, perceived through rhodopsin, specific receptors responsive to 450 nm waves, and the nerve pulses corresponding to blue wavelength are routed to the cortex and attached to the pencil-noun as a modifier. When the noun is promoted to being the subject (“let us discuss blue”), its nounhood is again seen as an object. An adverb modifies the tempo or manner of a noun-sequence. Even emotions are nouns: fear, pleasure, and desire are each a specific neural pattern corresponding to a Conscious-Point configuration; a shape of synaptic activation that exists as a configuration of a flexible body part. Grammar is not a human convention imposed on a formless world; it is a map of ontology; words are the names for the various configurations of existent substance. Each sentence parses the creation into the named noun substance-configurations, their sequences, their qualifier of being and doing — and over all of it, the namer is exercising Adam’s office.

IV. The Museum of Emotions and Senses: Where Blue Comes From

Here the conversation reached the question left open in “Triangulating Truth” — the engineering of qualia. We made some conceptual advances in modeling the possible method by which we may model the intangible experiences of reality as tangible configurations of reality’s substance (the Conscious Points).

The economy of archetypes. God did not create sense receptors for every sensation. He created sense receptors for a few, and from those combinations of the primitives, the entire spectrum of sensory and emotional experience emerged.

• Color: He created red, green, and blue receptors, and from these three all of the colors of the Roy G. Biv acronym (Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Indigo, Violet). From these three, every shade and variation – aquamarine, scarlet, and teal result as an experience by combination.
• Taste: He created receptors for salty (electrolytes), sweet (energy), sour (spoilage), bitter (toxins), and umami (protein). From these 5, all tastes arise, such as the complex tastes of sushi, asparagus, and kimchi.
• Smell: is more complex, with ~400 molecular receptors that detect various molecular features, including chain length, functional groups, ring structures, chirality, volatility, and polarity.
• Sound: Contains a number of primitives, distinctions of character within the acoustic wave. The Primitive Dimensions of Sound”
  • 1. Frequency (Pitch): The rate of vibration of the sound wave. Low frequency → low pitch; High frequency → high pitch. This is a true primitive because the cochlea maps frequency spatially (tonotopy). Every other auditory quality depends on this axis.
  • 2. Amplitude (Loudness): The magnitude of the pressure wave. Larger amplitude → louder; Smaller amplitude → quieter. This is independent of frequency and is detected by firing rate in auditory neurons.
  • 3. Temporal Envelope (Attack, Decay, Sustain, Release): How the sound changes over time. sharp attack → percussive; slow attack → smooth; long decay → echoic; short decay → clipped; This is a primitive because the auditory system has dedicated neurons for onset, offset, and temporal modulation.
  • 4. Timbre (Spectral Shape / Harmonic Content): The pattern of frequencies present at once. This is what makes: a violin different from a flute; a human voice different from a trumpet; two sounds with the same pitch and loudness still sound different. Timbre is a primitive because the auditory cortex decomposes sound into spectral components.
  • 5. Spatial Location (Interaural Time & Level Differences): Your brain computes: interaural time difference (ITD) → left/right timing; interaural level difference (ILD) → left/right loudness; spectral filtering by the pinna → up/down, front/back. This is a primitive because it uses dedicated brainstem circuits.
  • 6. Phase / Coherence: Whether waves align or interfere. This matters for: binaural beats; sound localization; distinguishing multiple overlapping sources. Phase is a primitive because the auditory system detects phase locking at low frequencies.
  • Touch resolves into a handful of primitives — pressure, stretch, heat, pain — whose superposition yields everything from the burn of the sun to the joy of a caress.

Summary Table — The True Primitives of Touch

Emotions are likewise combinations of primitives, though not clearly identified. These are subcortical, ancient, and shared across mammals. They are not learned — they are wired. The emotions are grouped in the following families:

• 1. SEEKING: Curiosity, exploration, anticipation, motivation. The drive to investigate, learn, pursue.
• 2. RAGE: Anger, frustration, boundary defense.
• 3. FEAR: Threat detection, avoidance, freezing, vigilance.
• 4. LUST: Sexual desire and reproductive motivation.
• 5. CARE: Nurturing, affection, bonding, parental warmth.
• 6. PANIC / GRIEF: Separation distress, loneliness, loss, longing.
• 7. PLAY: Joyful social engagement, rough‑and‑tumble play, humor.

The senses and the emotions alike reduce to a small alphabet of elemental experiences; the infinite vocabulary of life is combinatorially spelled in the phonemes of spoken and letters of written language; the RBG of colors, shapes and angles, and brightness of vision; and the minimal number of elemental nerve receptor types that mediate smell, taste, and touch. This is the same architectural signature found everywhere in CPP: a tiny set of primitives (four Conscious Points for motion, the Grid Points holding space, and the DI-bits carrying messages) generating, by configuration alone, the entire zoo of particles, forces, and conscious experiences. The Creator is an economist of elements and a spendthrift of combinations.

The Museum. Picture, then — as a working image — a room in the heavens: the Museum of Senses and Emotion. Under each glass: an archetype. Blue. Fear. Salty. Loud. Bright. Pain. Pleasure. Smooth. Fear. Lust. Play. Each archetype is a specific configuration of Conscious Points that God has established—the prototype, the first instance, the standard exemplar. With each elemental sense, He has bound a definite experience: when this shape occurs in our nervous system, the conscious experience arises from the spirit experiencing that configuration of Conscious Points. Our nervous systems do not create these experiences; they instantiate the configurations, and the indwelling spirit, perceiving the configuration, receives the experience God bound to it. Humanity’s creative capability is downstream: we combine archetypes (blue + green) and name the combinations (aquamarine, squishy, exhilarating…); God made the letters; we perceive the words (the complex assembly of sensory perception and emotional experience). In that complexity, we play out the drama of His creation and satisfy His desire for love, overcoming, creativity, and interest. And when the honest question is pressed — but how did God create that experience of blue as the seen object? How did the isness of blue arise? The analysis reaches its floor: there is no deeper excavation. The archetypes are where explanation rests, and the mystery begins. “Canst thou by searching find out God?” (Job 11:7). We have traced blue to the threshold of the throne. Beyond that is a mystery.

Seeing God through the filter of creation: Having postulated that the Almighty is the source of all experience, and that the Conscious Points are the filter, and our own spirit as the perceptive point of consciousness allows us to be aware of the universe of form. This sequence of transmission: 1) God (the pure white light of all possibilities), 2) the filter/shaping of the Conscious Point configuration (the object of sensory perception), and 3) the perceiver (the spirit-soul of the man) who is conscious of the configuration of consciousness which he is perceiving. This model gives us a way of making the intangible plausibly comprehensible in terms of a mechanistic chain of cause.

The original question was, what are we actually seeing when we see blue? On CPP’s account, we perceive only configurations of Conscious Points. The Conscious Points are the elements of consciousness that God’s mind created as points of perspective, allowing Him to look back at Himself. Therefore: every perception is a perception of God, filtered through a configuration. Picture God as pure light at the center of all things, and every configuration of the Dipole Sea as a lens, a stained pane, a filter between that light and us, the perceiving spirits. Look at God through the 450-495 nanometer configuration of the Dipole Sea, and you see Him as blue. Through the salty, a chord, the pungent smell configuration, you taste Him as salty, harmonic, and pungent. Through the sequence-configuration of a body in stride, you see God running. We never perceive the pure light directly, but we never perceive anything else but Him: “For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things” (Romans 11:36); “in thy light shall we see light” (Psalm 36:9).

The uniformity of qualia across all perceivers — Sunday’s swarm argument: we all see the same blue because we are all looking at the same God through the same archetype. His experience of the configuration is the experience; ours is His received. There is a difference in hardware; the man, animal, tree, and rock are different in their capacity to resolve the patterns, the Conscious Point configurations. The source, the light of God’s consciousness, never varies, but we, as receivers, bring a different sensory mechanism and our unique framing based on experience. The Near Death Experience of brighter colors is the removal of the dimming apparatus of the sensory filter. The soul-spirit within perceives the Conscious Point configuration directly. Those who return from death’s threshold report that the colors were alive and everything was clearer and more real. That is exactly what the model predicts: direct perception of the configurations. “For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face” (1 Corinthians 13:12); “we shall see him as he is” (1 John 3:2). Even blindness clarifies under the analysis: the blind man does not experience darkness — darkness is a seen thing. The blind man lacks the perceptive apparatus entirely, and no communion of confirmation with the seeing world can supply it. Which is the human condition itself with respect to the glories not yet revealed. We look forward to that day when we see Him as he is — “eye hath not seen… the things which God hath prepared” (1 Corinthians 2:9).

V. Will: The Noun of the Not-Yet

The question that launched the conversational exploration — what is “will” and where does it come from? — now answers itself with the tools assembled.

Will defined. Apply the grammar: will is a noun — a configuration of neural activation held in the brain and spirit — whose content is a future configuration of the world. Desire is the pull of that envisioned state; will is the commitment to make the outer world match the inner picture, and the refusal of satisfaction until it does. The willing soul says: the universe is to be in that state; I carry that state within me now; I will not release the tension between the world as it is and the world as I have envisioned it until they correspond. When the two meet, when reality corresponds to desired reality, the rush of consummation follows. Will is thus the engine that converts imagination into history. It is also, therefore, the most dangerous faculty we have: Scripture’s warning that men are drawn away by their own desires (James 1:14) is the observation that the same engine runs on any fuel. The discipline of the Godly life is not the extinction of will but its alignment — reining the desires to God’s desires, willing what He wills, until “delight thyself also in the LORD; and he shall give thee the desires of thine heart” (Psalm 37:4) describes our commitment: His desire, implanted, felt as ours, willed by us, satisfied in Him.

Where a will comes from: a case study. I examined the origin of my presidential aspiration that has been in the background, shaping the last forty years of my life. I was in a Landmark Seminar in 1986 (a New Age personal growth organization started by Werner Erhardt). The exercise of the Seminar was to think of a project that would make the world better. Each week, we shared our individual vision with our small breakout group. Each week, the seminar leader challenged us to think bigger. I recognized the pattern quickly and decided to stop escalation. I was in an impressionable state and answered in defiance, if that’s what you want, “I’ll trump you and stop this endless think bigger challenge to my small aspirations.” So, I said: “My plan is to become President and develop a participatory democracy.” That moment, that vow, that vision imprinted. The imprint took shape in my vision of the Voting Network, an initiative I developed to counter propaganda with populism. If the whole village compares notes, “the emperor has no clothes” becomes common knowledge that no authority can declare invalid. When everyone knows that everyone knows, a people can’t be fooled or deceived with misinformation, disinformation, or propaganda. I saw it as a genuinely workable idea for making a populace immune to top-down deception. I considered it worthy of a life’s pursuit. And beneath the idea, the deeper spring was the desire to make the world better. A year later, I found God, the Bible, and the understanding of the fundamental understructure of reality. I believe this is one of God’s primitive desires, to manifest the Lord’s prayer, “Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.” (Matthew 6:10). I believe this goal is best explained as God’s desire to manifest and experience the world in its mature state through the voluntary acts of His children, the parts of Himself that choose to follow His way.

God has bound a good feeling to every world-bettering intention — one more exhibit in the Museum. The reformer’s fire is the experience of God’s own pleasure in repair. The willing heart is the recipient of the joy of the fulfillment of the divine desire. Here is the doctrine of a personal calling in CPP dress: “it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure” (Philippians 2:13). Notice what this account does to ambition. Notice that my presidential aspiration is the desire not for the experience of the office (the dinners, the press conferences, the meetings, the crises, the speeches, all of which are plausibly unpleasant) but for the medium the office affords: the platform to speak, inspire, and move the nation toward the state He desires, on Earth as it is in Heaven. And so the goal can be held rightly and lightly: as the candy at the end of the maze that motivates every corridor of the work (the physics, the homeschool, the essays, the daily counsel to the nation), with full knowledge that the candy itself is not the point and may never be tasted. My Kabbalah teacher’s proverb applies: take what you want and pay for it. Every attainment has a cost; framed as service to God, our life, each moment making the world better, gives God pleasure in His experience of our participation in the struggle to push against the enemy He installed. Regarding the attainment of the ultimate outcome, if, thirty years hence, no band ever plays for this candidacy, but someone for whom the band does play implements the vision, it will have accomplished the same thing for God’s pleasure. The goal is: a populace immunized against propaganda; a nation counseled into loving one another; a commitment to a good and Godly process, not just a desirable end. If my life can inspire the group habit and institutions to move in that direction, the desire will have been satisfied in its true object. That is will purified: attached to the configuration, detached from the credit.

The daily brief as the form of the work. From this follows the practical program now taking shape: a campaign in the shape of a counsel — daily addresses, fireside chats, solution-speeches — taking each day’s news as the case study and asking every time, what is the problem, and what can be done as the long-term cure?” The Netflix Boeing “Freefall” documentary, about their descent from a quality-dedicated company to a profit-seeking one, becomes a teaching moment. It is a hard lesson on the outcome of pursuing profit and efficiency over a commitment to quality. The misplaced pursuit of profit over quality resulted in the death of 346 people in two 737 Max crashes. Providing value by service is the only reason for business. Profits follow naturally. The Iran threat becomes a campaign to transform the hearts of a captive people. Reach people longing to be free. Preach, teach, and live the gospel through every effective channel. Change the people, and the leaders will follow. Externally managing those who worship other gods (the desires of money, lust, power) is not sustainable; every man must take up the challenge and manage himself. Training/warning/counseling against every contingency is impossible; life has too many variables. The only sustainable “teaching a man to fish” type of counsel is to point every man to the source of all counsel, to God Himself, the Holy Spirit as the inner counselor. And since we have a recorded version of His voice/words in the Bible, we can use it as a pattern to model our own actions. We can listen to our inner voice and recognize the solutions it offers that correspond to/align with the way of the Words of God/the Biblical spirit. Disciplining oneself in the way of the one True God is the fastest path to personal and societal transformation. The corruption that has infected government should be called what it is – prostitution. We must all resist the temptation to trade authority/trust/values for monetary gain (see analysis below). The proposed method is to develop a vocabulary that enables understanding of God’s motivation for creating and sustaining the universe; the likely outcome of the universe’s workings; the forces guiding nature; and the structure and drives that move the minds and hearts of man. I believe a deep understanding of the elemental structure of the physical and spiritual universe would facilitate acceptance of God’s omnipresence and His rule and role in our lives. Understanding His immanence gives gravity, meaning, and accountability to our words, thoughts, and actions. Such knowledge gives a reason to act right. I believe knowing and understanding the Conscious Point understructure of the universe gives the substance and framework to understand emotions and sensory experience. The building blocks and forces composing the universe are then available to model how and why humans act and choose as they do. Such a pattern of forces and limitations makes the counsel concrete. The paradigm, if understood, gives words to concepts and unseen underlying realities sufficient to counsel a nation on how to get along. The briefs operate as ideas, reasons, and strategies to overcome temptation; to forgive the sinner who repents; and to ensure justice and responsibility/accountability for the rebellious against God’s law. Defining, naming, and hating evil with the fervor of God should be a passion for all. The goal is transforming the hearts of all to walk in the way of Christ. We must all draw the line between Godly and unGodly, and we can do this by feeding on the Word. “Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee.” (Psalm 119:11) A guiding principle is asking what we can do as a people to make America Godly. We can frame our goals around our answer to the question, “What would Jesus Christ say to the nation today, about the issues of today?” And behind the daily words, the longer purpose: every conversation recorded, every essay published, every site populated is a body of work recorded and meant to outlive its author. It is a repository of training data for a future counselor who can carry the message when my voice is gone.

VI. Revelation 12:11 — The Anatomy of Overcoming

The conversation’s height was an extended exposition of a single verse: “And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death” (Revelation 12:11). The three clauses, examined in order, turn out to be a complete anatomy of the transformed life.

The blood of the Lamb: transformation is real. John Howard’s lament — that it is sad if people need something untrue to hold their lives together — and Michael Sherman’s demand for evidence both presuppose that nothing actually happens in conversion: the remedy is imaginary, a false promise. The first clause answers: something real occurred, and occurs. The atonement — this is the burden of the Twelve Postulates — was not God arranging an inspiring example of suffering nobly borne; history is full of noble sufferers, and none of them saved the universe. The Cross fundamentally altered what the universe is capable of: it made possible a new kind of human being — one whose heart, upon inviting Christ in, actually changes by the invited indwelling of the Father, Son, and Spirit. Such a reborn man desires differently; his conscience now feels the neighbor’s pain as his own. The blood of the Lamb is the ontological claim that hearts can be, and are, remade — “a new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you” (Ezekiel 36:26); “if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature” (2 Corinthians 5:17). To the excellent man who says “I don’t need it — I’m moral as I am,” the answer of this clause is: as good as you are, you can be something more than you realize — not improved but transformed, with desires you do not currently have and joys you cannot currently feel.

The word of their testimony: the witness that will not recant. The second clause is the swarm argument militant. The overcomers testify — this works, God is good, I was changed — and they do not stop when threatened. “If you don’t take that back, we will kill you.” — “Then you can. But it is simply true, and I will not take it back.” When no one will recant what is good, evil loses its editorial control over reality. This is the voting network in its ultimate form: the emperor’s nakedness proclaimed by every subject at once, propaganda drowned in convergent witness — and it is why the enemy’s first target is always the isolation or intimidation of witnesses.

Loving not their lives unto the death: the unbuyable soul. The third clause illustrated by an old joke with a theological spine. A man asks a woman to bed; she refuses. He offers a million dollars; she agrees. Immediately he drops the offer to ten; she demands, “What kind of woman do you think I am?” He replies, “We’ve established that. Now we’re just negotiating the price.” The principle: if you can be bought at any price, you are for sale, and everything after is negotiation. And it generalizes past money to every currency of coercion: when the choice is, “Do the deed or …” whether the consequence is death, shame, poverty, injury, loss, the decision whether to do a little or a lot of compromise is merely a type of dealmaking: each threat only discovers the price. “Loving not their lives unto the death” is the state of having no price in any currency: not wealth (the billion refused), not survival (the martyr’s calm), not reputation (immunity to shame). Such a person cannot be made a tool of Satan by any offer, because the lever — the love of this life and its goods above righteousness — has been removed. And here the personal and the political fuse: the graft system that runs the world is nothing but the joke at national scale. Campaign finance for legislative favors is prostitution. The only solution that reaches the root — deeper than any reform, any exposure, any law — is a citizenry of the unbuyable: a world where the billion is offered, and everyone says no, at which point the power of money simply evaporates, since money’s power was never anything but the purchase of consent. This is a world that works for everyone, with no one and nothing left out. This is the behavior that reflects or at least leads to Earth as it is in heaven, and for loving your neighbor as yourself.

The corollary of service. The positive face of the third clause: the self not clung to is the self spent on others. And in the God-lives-us framework, every act of service is arithmetic in God’s own experience: the man on the corner who received the dollar, the family comforted in their loss, the load lightened. In each, God suffered, and that suffering was replaced by the relief God now enjoys. “Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me” (Matthew 25:40) is not metaphor but mechanism.

The ministry caution attached: help that collapses the helper’s own life into chaos serves no one. Lifting the fallen, the homeless were the case discussed, is a structured environment: community with Godly rules, discipline with rewards, Scripture as the curriculum, and the goal of each person receiving the changed heart, experiencing the change, and adding their word of testimony to the swarm. Shared experience, it was observed, is what lingers and multiplies — it takes a village to raise a man, and the village is the delivery system of teaching wisdom, living as an example, nourishing the weak and training in strength, and giving the grace of strong medicine.

VII. “Whatever You’re Doing — Stop It”: The Smallest Complete Sermon

The conversation closed its moral circuit with the smallest tool in the kit, and a live testimony of its power. The story (Michael Sherman’s, retold): Mrs. French, his High School English teacher with failing eyesight, could detect misbehavior she could not identify, and disciplined the class with the immortal formula: “I don’t know what you are doing, but whatever it is — stop it.” The formula is a complete moral technology. It requires no diagnosis, no analysis of the sin’s genealogy, no negotiation with the impulse: something is wrong; stop it; redirect. And the lesson includes a principle, received and practiced, that has been decisive against running thoughts and old addictions — not by wrestling the desire but by closing the option: “That’s not an option anymore. I don’t do that. Change focus; let the brain empty of it; move.” The whole discipline reduces to remembering the one thing one already knows how to do — and remembering, repeated, becomes habit: “I’m not drinking. Oh, that’s right — I don’t drink.” This is Mrs. French agreeing with Paul: “reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin” (Romans 6:11). The counsel is not to fight sin at each occasion, but to reckon it dead, a settled fact needing only recollection. And its refinement closed the loop: the stop applies even to good activity when evaluation is due — stop, assess, confirm the heading, go. This is will exercising governance over itself: the desire examined, the maze checked against the candy, the inner configuration re-aligned before the outer pursuit resumes.

Conclusion: The Points to Consider

Let us tie together the threads of conversation. God creates by an economy of archetypes and an act of holding: few elements, endless combinations, and a ratchet of divine preservation that makes both the four-billion-year assembly and the instantaneous healing one operation at two speeds. We, bearing Adam’s office, participate by naming — declaring group entities into being, carving the world of requirement into storerooms and studios and callings. Every experience in that world — blue, cinnamon, fear, the swell of music — is an archetype from God’s museum, and every perception whatsoever is a sight of God through a lens. Our experience of life is nothing else other than our sight of God. Will is the noun of the not-yet — a future configuration carried within, refusing satisfaction until the world conforms — and it is holy exactly insofar as the configuration carried is God’s. The transformed life that Revelation 12:11 anatomizes — really changed by the blood, testifying without recantation, unbuyable in every currency — is the only force that overcomes the adversary, whether in a soul, an industry, or a nation. And the whole of sanctification, on days when the architecture of morality — the structure of the physical and spiritual universe —is too much to hold in mind, abbreviate the therapy to the schoolteacher’s sentence: whatever you’re doing—stop it. You can resist, just distract your attention onto anything else. Desire cannot sustain without attention to its object.

“For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things: to whom be glory for ever. Amen.” — Romans 11:36

— Thomas

---

Renaissance Ministries | Hyperphysics Institute

Of one heart to make Christ King – 1 Chronicles 12:38